• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康领域离散选择实验报告清单:DIRECT 清单。

A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist.

机构信息

Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Health Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Oct;42(10):1161-1175. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01431-6. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01431-6
PMID:39227559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11405421/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reporting standards of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) in health have not kept pace with the growth of this method, with multiple reviews calling for better reporting to improve transparency, assessment of validity and translation. A key missing piece has been the absence of a reporting checklist that details minimum standards of what should be reported, as exists for many other methods used in health economics.

METHODS

This paper reports the development of a reporting checklist for DCEs in health, which involved a scoping review to identify potential items and a Delphi consensus study among 45 DCE experts internationally to select items and guide the wording and structure of the checklist. The Delphi study included a best-worst scaling study for prioritisation.

CONCLUSIONS

The final checklist is presented along with guidance on how to apply it. This checklist can be used by authors to ensure that sufficient detail of a DCE's methods are reported, providing reviewers and readers with the information they need to assess the quality of the study for themselves. Embedding this reporting checklist into standard practice for health DCEs offers an opportunity to improve consistency of reporting standards, thereby enabling transparency of review and facilitating comparison of studies and their translation into policy and practice.

摘要

背景

离散选择实验(DCE)在健康领域的报告标准并未跟上该方法的发展步伐,多项综述呼吁更好的报告,以提高透明度、评估有效性和可翻译性。一个关键的缺失部分是缺乏一份报告清单,详细说明应该报告的最低标准,就像健康经济学中使用的许多其他方法一样。

方法

本文报告了健康领域 DCE 报告清单的制定,该清单涉及范围综述以确定潜在项目,以及国际 45 名 DCE 专家的德尔菲共识研究,以选择项目并指导清单的措辞和结构。德尔菲研究包括用于优先级排序的最佳最差标度研究。

结论

最后提出了一份清单,并附有如何应用它的指南。作者可以使用这份清单来确保报告足够详细的 DCE 方法,为评审员和读者提供他们自己评估研究质量所需的信息。将这份报告清单纳入健康 DCE 的标准实践中,为提高报告标准的一致性提供了机会,从而提高了审查的透明度,并促进了研究的比较及其在政策和实践中的转化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b4/11405421/34d8dacd1de9/40273_2024_1431_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b4/11405421/4ec76700df36/40273_2024_1431_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b4/11405421/34d8dacd1de9/40273_2024_1431_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b4/11405421/4ec76700df36/40273_2024_1431_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2b4/11405421/34d8dacd1de9/40273_2024_1431_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist.健康领域离散选择实验报告清单:DIRECT 清单。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Oct;42(10):1161-1175. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01431-6. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.医疗干预措施系统评价概述报告规范:PRIOR 声明的制定。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:e070849. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
3
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:2024 年 OMIs 的 PRISMA-COSMIN。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 9;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00727-7.
4
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.系统评价报告结局测量工具(OMIs)的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 对 OMIs 的 2024 年修订版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 9;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02256-9.
5
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 2024 年 OMIs 版。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111422. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111422. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension.试验方案中报告结果的指南:SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版
JAMA. 2022 Dec 20;328(23):2345-2356. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243.
7
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 2024 版。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):2029-2046. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03634-y. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Protocol for developing a Consolidated Checklist for Reporting Mixed Methods Research (CORMIX) using modified Delphi.使用改良德尔菲法制定混合方法研究报告综合清单(CORMIX)的方案
PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0321587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321587. eCollection 2025.
9
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement.《行为干预单病例报告指南(SCRIBE)2016声明》
Can J Occup Ther. 2016 Jun;83(3):184-95. doi: 10.1177/0008417416648124.
10
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement.《行为干预单病例报告指南(SCRIBE)2016声明》
Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;96(7):e1-e10. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.7.e1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Literature Review of Preference Studies in Migraine Treatments.偏头痛治疗中偏好研究的系统文献综述
Patient. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00768-0.
2
Public hesitancy for AI-based detection of neurodegenerative diseases in France.法国公众对基于人工智能的神经退行性疾病检测的犹豫态度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 23;15(1):26849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11917-8.
3
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments on Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccinations.关于新冠疫苗接种偏好的离散选择实验的系统评价

本文引用的文献

1
ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi.ACCORD(准确共识报告文件):通过改良 Delphi 法制定的生物医学共识方法报告指南。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
A discrete choice experiment to examine the factors influencing consumers' willingness to purchase health apps.一项用于考察影响消费者购买健康应用程序意愿因素的离散选择实验。
Mhealth. 2023 Jul 3;9:21. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-39. eCollection 2023.
3
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards - Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI): Explanation and Elaboration.
Patient. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00753-7.
4
Developing Tools for the Efficient Design of Health Preference Studies: Taxonomy of Attributes and Prototype of an Attribute Library.开发健康偏好研究高效设计工具:属性分类法与属性库原型
Patient. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00751-9.
5
Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.对幼儿健康生活方式倡议成果的偏好与支付意愿:一项离散选择实验。
Pediatr Obes. 2025 Sep;20(9):e70033. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.70033. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
6
Public preferences for the value and implementation of genomic newborn screening: Insights from two discrete choice experiments in Australia.公众对基因组新生儿筛查的价值和实施的偏好:来自澳大利亚两项离散选择实验的见解。
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 3;112(7):1515-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.001. Epub 2025 May 28.
7
Undergraduate nursing students' preferences for virtual reality simulations in nursing skills training: A discrete choice experiment.本科护理专业学生对护理技能培训中虚拟现实模拟的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Digit Health. 2025 May 23;11:20552076251339009. doi: 10.1177/20552076251339009. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
9
Preferences for the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.澳大利亚乳腺癌筛查中使用人工智能的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00742-w.
10
Unveiling Preferences in Closed Communities: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Elicit Ultra-Orthodox Women Preferences for Video Consultations in Primary Care.揭示封闭社区中的偏好:开发离散选择实验(DCE)问卷以引出极端正统派女性对初级保健视频咨询的偏好。
Patient. 2025 May;18(3):263-277. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00734-w. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
卫生经济评估报告统一标准 - 信息价值(CHEERS-VOI):解释与说明。
Value Health. 2023 Oct;26(10):1461-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
A Roadmap for Increasing the Usefulness and Impact of Patient-Preference Studies in Decision Making in Health: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.提高患者偏好研究在健康决策中有用性和影响力的路线图:ISPOR 工作组的良好实践报告。
Value Health. 2023 Feb;26(2):153-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.004.
5
Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.当前健康相关离散选择实验中偏好异质性会计的实践:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Oct;40(10):943-956. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01178-y. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Best-Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review.最佳最差标度法在健康领域中对目标物的优先级排序:系统综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Sep;40(9):883-899. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01167-1. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force.《健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)》2022 年解释与详述:ISPOR CHEERS II 良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):10-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008.
8
Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.基层医疗专业人员离散选择实验中所用方法的系统评价与效度评估
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Dec 9;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00295-8.
9
Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.应答者理解在离散选择实验中的应用:范围综述。
Patient. 2021 Jan;14(1):17-53. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00467-y. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.健康科学中的德尔菲技术:一幅图谱。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.