• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国高中生重大决策自我效能量表(MDMSES)的编制与初步验证

Construction and initial validations of the major decision-making self-efficacy scale (MDMSES) for Chinese high school students.

作者信息

Li Jingwen, Zhang Yanan, Gao Limei, Qiu Zhihai, Zhou Yu, Guo Ying, Hao Tong, Li Yongyi, Bian Yu, Li Dandan, Zhu Chunyan

机构信息

School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

No.1 High School, Hefei, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 28;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02405-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02405-9
PMID:39876007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773702/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major decision-making self-efficacy (MDMSE) is an important indicator of students' ability to make effective decisions in specialty selection. It has implications for students' personal growth and career counselling interventions. While the previous MDMSES has been widely used in the context of China's New College Entrance Examination reform, the increased choice of majors and advancement of career planning necessitate a new scale to assess high school students' MDMSE levels.

METHODS

Scale items were generated based on a literature review, student interviews, and expert reviews. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to assess the appropriateness of the scale's structure, and network analysis was used to calculate concurrent validity. Retest reliability was calculated to evaluate stability.

RESULTS

The MDMSES contains 24 items with five factors (Information Acquisition, Decision Persistence, Self-Determination, Self-Evaluation, and Social Support). The results show that the scale has a good five-factor structure (χ/df = 1.91, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.05, and SRMR = 0.06), and the internal consistency reliability of the total scale is 0.91.

CONCLUSION

The scale development results satisfied the psychometric and statistical criteria, allowing the scale to be used as a means of detection to support intervention efforts for individuals with low MDMSE levels.

摘要

背景

重大决策自我效能感(MDMSE)是学生在专业选择中做出有效决策能力的重要指标。它对学生的个人成长和职业咨询干预具有重要意义。尽管先前的MDMSES已在中国新高考改革背景下广泛使用,但专业选择的增加和职业规划的推进需要一个新的量表来评估高中生的MDMSE水平。

方法

量表项目基于文献综述、学生访谈和专家评审生成。采用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析来评估量表结构的适宜性,并使用网络分析来计算同时效度。计算重测信度以评估稳定性。

结果

MDMSES包含24个项目,分为五个因素(信息获取、决策坚持性、自我决定、自我评估和社会支持)。结果表明,该量表具有良好的五因素结构(χ/df = 1.91,CFI = 0.92,TLI = 0.91,RMSEA = 0.05,SRMR = 0.06),总量表的内部一致性信度为0.91。

结论

量表编制结果满足心理测量和统计学标准,该量表可作为一种检测手段,为MDMSE水平较低的个体的干预工作提供支持。

相似文献

1
Construction and initial validations of the major decision-making self-efficacy scale (MDMSES) for Chinese high school students.中国高中生重大决策自我效能量表(MDMSES)的编制与初步验证
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 28;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02405-9.
2
Development of Chinese college students' perception teacher differential behavior scale and its reliability and validity test.发展中国大学生感知教师差异化行为量表及其信度和效度检验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 12;12(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01973-6.
3
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Career Decision-Making Challenges of International Medical Students in China.开发并验证用于测量中国国际医学生职业决策挑战的工具。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Nov 22;13(1):572-584. doi: 10.5334/pme.1384. eCollection 2024.
4
Examining the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy in clinical teaching scale with undergraduate nursing students: A cross-sectional study.用本科护生检验临床教学自我效能感量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104093. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104093. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Validation of the Chinese version of the perceived medical school stress (PMSS) scale and analysis of the associated factors.中文版感知医学院校压力量表(PMSS)的效度验证及相关因素分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 13;13(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02604-4.
6
Revision and validation of the prosocialness scale for adults (PSA) among chinese college students.修订和验证中文版大学生亲社会倾向量表(PSA)。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Apr 19;11(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01124-3.
7
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Assess Physical Activity Participation Behavior Among Chinese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.评估中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动参与行为的工具的开发与心理测量学评价
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Apr 30;20:1321-1334. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S511061. eCollection 2025.
8
Validation and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the academic self-efficacy scale for university students.大学生学业自我效能感量表中文版的验证和测量不变性。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 24;12:e17798. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17798. eCollection 2024.
9
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a School-to-Work Transition Anxiety Scale for Healthcare Students.开发和验证中文版医学生从学校到工作过渡焦虑量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;18(14):7658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147658.
10
An examination of the career decision-making self-efficacy of final-year nursing students.应届护理专业学生职业决策自我效能的研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jul;138:106196. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106196. Epub 2024 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing Reciprocal Associations between Parenting and Youth's Motivational Resources of Career Decision-Making Agency during the Postsecondary Transition.检验父母教养方式与青少年在后高中阶段职业决策能动性相关的动机资源之间的相互关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Dec;51(12):2396-2410. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01672-8. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.使用标准化均方根残差(SRMR)评估结构方程模型中的精确拟合度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):110-130. doi: 10.1177/0013164420926231. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
Chinese university teachers' job and life satisfaction: examining the roles of basic psychological needs satisfaction and self-efficacy.
中国高校教师的工作与生活满意度:探究基本心理需求满足感和自我效能感的作用
J Gen Psychol. 2022 Jul-Sep;149(3):327-348. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2020.1853503. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
Investigating Psychometrics of Career Decision Ambiguity Tolerance Scale.职业决策模糊耐受性量表的心理测量学研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 10;10:2067. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02067. eCollection 2019.
5
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.估计心理网络及其准确性:教程论文。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
6
Can network analysis transform psychopathology?网络分析能否改变精神病理学?
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Nov;86:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
Role of career decision-making self-efficacy and risk of career options on career decision-making of Chinese graduates.职业决策自我效能感及职业选择风险对中国毕业生职业决策的作用
Psychol Rep. 2014 Apr;114(2):625-34. doi: 10.2466/01.17.PR0.114k20w9.
8
The relationship of career decision self-efficacy, trait anxiety, and affectivity among undergraduate students.本科生职业决策自我效能感、特质焦虑与情感性之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Dec;111(3):805-13. doi: 10.2466/01.09.10.PR0.111.6.805-813.
9
The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability.组内相关系数作为可靠性的一种度量。
Psychol Rep. 1966 Aug;19(1):3-11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3.
10
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.