Le Maho Yvon, Tasiemski Aurélie, Bertile Fabrice, Bulet Philippe
University of Strasbourg, CNRS, Hubert Curien Pluridisciplinary Institute, UMR7178, 67087 Strasbourg, France.
University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 9017 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
Sci One Health. 2024 Nov 27;4:100096. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2024.100096. eCollection 2025.
Most biomedical research on animals is based on the handful of the so-called standard model organisms, i.e. laboratory mice, rats or , but the keys to some important biomedical questions may simply not be found in these. However, compared with the high number of molecules originating from plants in clinical use, and with the countless unique adaption mechanisms that animals have developed over the course of evolution to cope with environmental constrains, there is still few investigations on wild animals with biomedical objectives, and field studies are far fewer. A major limitation is insufficient funding, the main causes of which we analyze. We argue, however, that fieldwork is a key driver in generating new scientific knowledge as part of a One Health approach, by observing/documenting and understanding the diverse and largely unexplored biological processes evolved by animals adapted to unusual environmental conditions, which would be extreme conditions for humans. These conditions do not only refer to extreme temperatures, since lack of food or water, high pressures or lack of oxygen, are clearly extreme constraints. To conduct this research, there are serious limitations we propose to address. Specific techniques and methods are requested, not only to work in extreme environments, but also to minimize the ecological footprint of field work. The erosion of biodiversity is a major threat. The reduction of animal disturbance, a key issue, requires specific technologies and expertise. An ethical approach is requested, for the sake of transparency and to comply with the Nagoya Protocol on genetic resources. An interdisciplinary expertise and a meticulous planning are requested to overcome the field constraints and interface the associated laboratory work. We recommend focusing on the major threats to global human health today, which wild animals appear to resist particularly well, such as antibioresistance and diseases associated with lifestyle and senescence.
大多数动物生物医学研究都基于少数几种所谓的标准模式生物,即实验室小鼠、大鼠等,但一些重要生物医学问题的关键可能根本无法在这些生物中找到。然而,与临床使用中源自植物的大量分子相比,以及与动物在进化过程中为应对环境限制而发展出的无数独特适应机制相比,以生物医学为目标对野生动物的研究仍然很少,实地研究更是少之又少。一个主要限制是资金不足,我们分析了其主要原因。然而,我们认为,实地调查是作为“同一健康”方法一部分产生新科学知识的关键驱动力,通过观察/记录和理解适应异常环境条件(对人类来说是极端条件)的动物所进化出的多样且 largely unexplored 的生物过程。这些条件不仅指极端温度,因为缺乏食物或水、高压或缺氧显然也是极端限制。为开展这项研究,我们提出要解决一些严重限制。需要特定的技术和方法,不仅要在极端环境中工作,还要尽量减少实地工作的生态足迹。生物多样性的侵蚀是一个重大威胁。减少动物干扰这一关键问题需要特定技术和专业知识。为了透明度和遵守关于遗传资源的《名古屋议定书》,需要一种符合道德的方法。需要跨学科专业知识和精心规划来克服实地限制并衔接相关的实验室工作。我们建议关注当今对全球人类健康的主要威胁,而野生动物似乎对此具有特别强的抵抗力,比如抗生素耐药性以及与生活方式和衰老相关的疾病。