Suppr超能文献

近红外光谱法可区分大规模饲养的不育采采蝇和野生采采蝇。

Near-infrared spectroscopy discriminates mass-reared sterile and wild tsetse flies.

作者信息

Pagabeleguem Soumaïla, Da Dari F, Somé Bernard M, Avelessi Marx S P, Djègbè Nicaise D C, Yoda Rebecca L, Bagayogo Abdramane, Maïga Hamidou, Churcher Thomas S, Dabiré Roch K

机构信息

Institut des Sciences de l'Environnement et du Développement Rural, Université de Dédougou (UDDG), Dédougou, Burkina Faso.

Direction Génnérale de l'Entomologie et de la Lutte contre les Maladies Animales à vecteurs (DGELMA), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jan 29;19(1):e0012857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012857. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monitoring the efficacy of the sterile insect technique (SIT) programs, it is desirable to discriminate between wild and sterile tsetse males captured in monitoring traps. Currently, this is primarily achieved by marking sterile males with fluorescent dye powder before release, and identifying them using a fluorescence camera and/or microscope. However, the accuracy of this method is limited due to defective marking and wild flies contaminated with a few dye particles in the monitoring traps. Molecular techniques have been developed to discriminate doubtful flies, but they are expensive for endemic countries.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we investigate the ability of a new generation monitoring tool, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), to discriminate between laboratory-reared Glossina palpalis gambiensis males and their field counterparts. NIRS was able to discriminate wild males from laboratory-reared males with 86% accuracy. Notably, the prediction accuracy improved to 88% when the laboratory-reared flies had been irradiated.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that NIRS can successfully identify tsetse flies even when UV camera identification is inconclusive. However, further studies are needed to expand the training dataset and include additional environmental variables before validating NIRS as a complementary method for future tsetse eradication programs.

摘要

背景

在监测不育昆虫技术(SIT)项目的效果时,需要区分在监测诱捕器中捕获的野生采采蝇雄性和不育采采蝇雄性。目前,这主要通过在释放前用荧光染料粉末标记不育雄性,并使用荧光相机和/或显微镜进行识别来实现。然而,由于标记缺陷以及监测诱捕器中被少量染料颗粒污染的野生苍蝇,这种方法的准确性受到限制。已经开发出分子技术来区分可疑苍蝇,但对于流行国家来说成本高昂。

方法/主要发现:在此,我们研究了一种新一代监测工具——近红外光谱(NIRS)区分实验室饲养的冈比亚按蚊雄性及其野外同类的能力。NIRS能够以86%的准确率区分野生雄性和实验室饲养的雄性。值得注意的是,当实验室饲养的苍蝇经过辐照后,预测准确率提高到了88%。

结论/意义:这些发现表明,即使紫外线相机识别结果不确定,NIRS也能成功识别采采蝇。然而,在将NIRS验证为未来采采蝇根除计划的补充方法之前,还需要进一步研究来扩大训练数据集并纳入更多环境变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11809883/3ebe23364d9e/pntd.0012857.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验