• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding Individual Differences in Happiness Sources and Implications for Health Technology Design: Exploratory Analysis of an Open Dataset.理解幸福来源的个体差异及其对健康技术设计的影响:对一个开放数据集的探索性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 29;9:e65658. doi: 10.2196/65658.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Psychotherapy Access Barriers and Interest in Digital Mental Health Interventions Among Adults With Treatment Needs: Survey Study.有治疗需求的成年人的心理治疗障碍及对数字心理健康干预措施的兴趣:调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Apr 1;12:e65356. doi: 10.2196/65356.
5
Facilitators of and Barriers to Integrating Digital Mental Health Into County Mental Health Services: Qualitative Interview Analyses.将数字心理健康整合到县级心理健康服务中的促进因素和障碍:定性访谈分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 16;7:e45718. doi: 10.2196/45718.
6
Marital Status and Happiness During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的婚姻状况与幸福感
J Marriage Fam. 2024 Apr;86(2):473-493. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12956. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Preferences Regarding Information Strategies for Digital Mental Health Interventions Among Medical Students: Discrete Choice Experiment.医学生对数字心理健康干预信息策略的偏好:离散选择实验。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 4;8:e55921. doi: 10.2196/55921.
8
The interpersonal risks of valuing happiness: Links to interpersonal emotion regulation and close others' mental health.重视幸福的人际风险:与人际情绪调节及亲密他人心理健康的关联。
Emotion. 2025 Mar;25(2):488-506. doi: 10.1037/emo0001443. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
9
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.提供数字心理健康干预措施使用的人力支持:系统元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 6;25:e42864. doi: 10.2196/42864.
10
Exploring Engagement With and Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions in Young People of Different Ethnicities: Systematic Review.探索不同种族青少年对数字心理健康干预措施的参与度及其有效性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 7;27:e68544. doi: 10.2196/68544.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-producing digital mental health interventions: A systematic review.共同制作数字心理健康干预措施:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 25;10:20552076241239172. doi: 10.1177/20552076241239172. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework.数字技术在精神卫生系统中的实施障碍和促进因素:一项定性系统评价,为政策框架提供信息。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1.
3
The engagement problem: A review of engagement with digital mental health interventions and recommendations for a path forward.参与度问题:关于数字心理健康干预措施参与度的综述及未来发展路径建议
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;10(3):119-135. doi: 10.1007/s40501-023-00297-3. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Gender differences in mental health following the transition into parenthood: Longitudinal evidence from the UK.生育转变后心理健康的性别差异:来自英国的纵向证据。
Adv Life Course Res. 2023 Jun;56:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100550. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health.改善数据共享和FAIR数据实践以促进全球精神卫生的机遇。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Mar 3;10:e14. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.7. eCollection 2023.
6
Intrinsic capacity: an under-researched concept in geriatrics.内在能力:老年医学中一个研究不足的概念。
Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 2;52(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad183.
7
Understanding Engagement Strategies in Digital Interventions for Mental Health Promotion: Scoping Review.理解促进心理健康的数字干预中的参与策略:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 20;8(12):e30000. doi: 10.2196/30000.
8
Parenthood and Well-Being: A Decade in Review.为人父母与幸福:十年回顾
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):198-223. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12646. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
9
Subjective Health and Happiness in the United States: Gender Differences in the Effects of Socioeconomic Status Indicators.美国的主观健康与幸福:社会经济地位指标影响中的性别差异
J Ment Health Clin Psychol. 2020;4(2):8-17. doi: 10.29245/2578-2959/2020/2.1196. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Personality and Subjective Well-Being: Towards Personalized Persuasive Interventions for Health and Well-Being.个性与主观幸福感:迈向健康与幸福的个性化劝导干预措施
Online J Public Health Inform. 2020 May 16;12(1):e1. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10335. eCollection 2020.

理解幸福来源的个体差异及其对健康技术设计的影响:对一个开放数据集的探索性分析

Understanding Individual Differences in Happiness Sources and Implications for Health Technology Design: Exploratory Analysis of an Open Dataset.

作者信息

Ennis Edel, Bond Raymond, Mulvenna Maurice, Sweeney Colm

机构信息

School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.

School of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 29;9:e65658. doi: 10.2196/65658.

DOI:10.2196/65658
PMID:39879609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11822315/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychologists have developed frameworks to understand many constructs, which have subsequently informed the design of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) aimed at improving mental health outcomes. The science of happiness is one such domain that holds significant applied importance due to its links to well-being and evidence that happiness can be cultivated through interventions. However, as with many constructs, the unique ways in which individuals experience happiness present major challenges for designing personalized DMHIs.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to (1) present an analysis of how sex may interact with age, marital status, and parental status to predict individual differences in sources of happiness, and (2) to present a preliminary discussion of how open datasets may contribute to the process of designing health-related technology innovations.

METHODS

The HappyDB is an open database of 100,535 statements of what people consider to have made them happy, with some people asking to consider the past 24 hours (49,831 statements) and some considering the last 3 months (50,704 statements). Demographic information is also provided. Binary logistic regression analyses are used to determine whether various groups differed in their likelihood of selecting or not selecting a category as a source of their happiness.

RESULTS

Sex and age interacted to influence what was selected as sources of happiness, with patterns being less consistent among female individuals in comparison with male individuals. For marital status, differences in sources of happiness were predominantly between married individuals and those who are divorced or separated, but these were the same for both sexes. Married, single, and widowed individuals were all largely similar in their likelihood of selecting each of the categories as a source of their happiness. However, there were some anomalies, and sex appeared to be important in these anomalies. Sex and parental status also interacted to influence what was selected as sources of happiness.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex interacts with age, marital status, and parental status in the likelihood of reporting affection, bonding, leisure, achievement, or enjoying the moment as sources of happiness. The contribution of an open dataset to understanding individual differences in sources of happiness is discussed in terms of its potential role in addressing the challenges of designing DMHIs that are ethical, responsible, evidence based, acceptable, engaging, inclusive, and effective for users. The discussion considers how the content design of DMHIs in general may benefit from exploring new methods informed by diverse data sources. It is proposed that examining the extent to which insights from nondigital settings can inform requirements gathering for DMHIs is warranted.

摘要

背景

心理学家已开发出多种框架来理解许多概念,这些框架随后为旨在改善心理健康结果的数字心理健康干预措施(DMHI)的设计提供了参考。幸福科学就是这样一个领域,由于其与幸福感的关联以及有证据表明幸福可以通过干预来培养,因而具有重要的应用价值。然而,与许多概念一样,个体体验幸福的独特方式给设计个性化的数字心理健康干预措施带来了重大挑战。

目的

本文旨在(1)分析性别如何与年龄、婚姻状况和父母身份相互作用,以预测幸福来源的个体差异;(2)初步探讨开放数据集如何有助于设计与健康相关的技术创新。

方法

HappyDB是一个开放数据库,包含100535条关于人们认为使自己幸福的事情的陈述,其中一些人被要求考虑过去24小时(49831条陈述),另一些人则考虑过去三个月(50704条陈述)。同时还提供了人口统计学信息。采用二元逻辑回归分析来确定不同群体在选择或不选择某一类别作为幸福来源的可能性上是否存在差异。

结果

性别和年龄相互作用,影响了被选为幸福来源的因素,与男性相比,女性的模式不太一致。对于婚姻状况,幸福来源的差异主要存在于已婚个体与离异或分居个体之间,但两性情况相同。已婚、单身和丧偶个体在选择每个类别作为幸福来源的可能性上大致相似。然而,也存在一些异常情况,性别在这些异常情况中似乎很重要。性别和父母身份也相互作用,影响了被选为幸福来源的因素。

结论

在将情感、亲密关系、休闲、成就或享受当下视为幸福来源的可能性方面,性别与年龄、婚姻状况和父母身份存在相互作用。从应对设计符合伦理、负责、基于证据、可接受、引人入胜、包容且对用户有效的数字心理健康干预措施所面临的挑战的潜在作用角度,讨论了开放数据集对理解幸福来源个体差异的贡献。该讨论考虑了一般情况下数字心理健康干预措施的内容设计如何从探索受多种数据源启发的新方法中受益。建议有必要研究非数字环境中的见解在多大程度上可为数字心理健康干预措施的需求收集提供参考。