Suppr超能文献

英格兰炎性关节炎患者的镇痛药物处方:临床实践研究数据库中的观察性研究。

Analgesic prescribing in patients with inflammatory arthritis in England: observational studies in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

机构信息

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, High Lane, Burslem, Staffordshire, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 May 3;63(6):1672-1681. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead463.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite little evidence that analgesics are effective in inflammatory arthritis (IA), studies report substantial opioid prescribing. The extent this applies to other analgesics is uncertain. We undertook a comprehensive evaluation of analgesic prescribing in patients with IA in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum to evaluate this.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2020, cross-sectional analyses evaluated analgesic prescription annual prevalence in RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and geography. Joinpoint regression evaluated temporal prescribing trends. Cohort studies determined prognostic factors at diagnosis for chronic analgesic prescriptions using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Analgesic prescribing declined over time but remained common: 2004 and 2020 IA prescription prevalence was 84.2/100 person-years (PY) (95% CI 83.9, 84.5) and 64.5/100 PY (64.2, 64.8), respectively. In 2004, NSAIDs were most prescribed (56.1/100 PY; 55.8, 56.5), falling over time. Opioids were most prescribed in 2020 (39.0/100 PY; 38.7, 39.2). Gabapentinoid prescribing increased: 2004 prevalence 1.1/100 PY (1.0, 1.2); 2020 prevalence 9.9/100 PY (9.7, 10.0). Most opioid prescriptions were chronic (2020 prevalence 23.4/100 PY [23.2, 23.6]). Non-NSAID analgesic prescribing was commoner in RA, older people, females and deprived areas/northern England. Conversely, NSAID prescribing was commoner in axSpA/males, varying little by deprivation/geography. Peri-diagnosis was high-risk for starting chronic opioid/NSAID prescriptions. Prognostic factors for chronic opioid/gabapentinoid and NSAID prescriptions differed, with NSAIDs having no consistently significant association with deprivation (unlike opioids/gabapentinoids).

CONCLUSION

IA analgesic prescribing of all classes is widespread. This is neither evidence-based nor in line with guidelines. Peri-diagnosis is an opportune moment to reduce chronic analgesic prescribing.

摘要

目的

尽管几乎没有证据表明镇痛药对炎症性关节炎(IA)有效,但研究报告显示大量开处阿片类药物。至于其他镇痛药的情况则不确定。我们在 Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum 中对 IA 患者的镇痛药使用情况进行了全面评估,以评估这一情况。

方法

2004 年至 2020 年,采用横断面分析评估了 RA、PsA 和中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者中每年镇痛药的处方流行率,按年龄、性别、种族、贫困程度和地理位置进行分层。Joinpoint 回归分析评估了时间趋势。队列研究采用 Cox 比例风险模型确定了诊断时慢性镇痛药处方的预后因素。

结果

镇痛药的使用随着时间的推移而减少,但仍然很常见:2004 年和 2020 年 IA 处方流行率分别为 84.2/100 人年(95%CI 83.9,84.5)和 64.5/100 人年(64.2,64.8)。2004 年,最常开的是 NSAIDs(56.1/100 人年;55.8,56.5),随后逐渐减少。2020 年,最常开的是阿片类药物(39.0/100 人年;38.7,39.2)。加巴喷丁类药物的使用有所增加:2004 年的流行率为 1.1/100 人年(1.0,1.2);2020 年的流行率为 9.9/100 人年(9.7,10.0)。大多数阿片类药物处方是慢性的(2020 年的流行率为 23.4/100 人年[23.2,23.6])。非 NSAIDs 镇痛药在 RA、老年人、女性和贫困地区/英格兰北部更为常见。相反,在 axSpA/男性中,NSAIDs 的使用更为常见,且与贫困/地理位置的相关性很小。诊断前是开始慢性阿片类药物/NSAIDs 处方的高风险时期。慢性阿片类药物/加巴喷丁类药物和 NSAIDs 处方的预后因素不同,NSAIDs 与贫困程度没有一致的显著关联(与阿片类药物/加巴喷丁类药物不同)。

结论

IA 患者使用各类镇痛药都很常见。这既没有证据支持,也不符合指南。诊断前是减少慢性镇痛药处方的一个恰当时机。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验