Verwiel Ann, Rish William
ToxStrategies LLC, San Rafael, CA, United States.
ToxStrategies LLC, Asheville, NC, United States.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 Mar 1;21(2):301-313. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjae051.
Prompted by a series of executive orders, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is promoting cumulative impact assessment (CIA) to integrate numerous factors that have the potential to impact community health, which include nonchemical stressors such as socioeconomic conditions, pre-existing health conditions, and many others that historically have not been addressed by USEPA's chemical risk assessment paradigm. Understanding the cumulative impact of all stressors on responses to environmental exposures requires multidisciplinary input from social scientists, economists, and others not traditionally involved in chemical risk assessments. To gather input from these disciplines, a group of 13 independent experts with perspectives on CIA as a social scientist, economist, public health expert, or decision analyst participated in a virtual workshop to obtain their perspectives regarding key aspects of CIA. The independent experts, who have decades of experience studying cumulative impacts in vulnerable population groups and environmental justice (EJ), responded anonymously to charge questions specific to their expertise and then were asked to review and comment on other's responses within and outside their discipline. The questions and responses were organized by the authors into general topics (e.g., screening tools and indexes, role of nonchemical stressors in cumulative impacts, uncertainties), and discussions across and within the four disciplines were summarized by the authors. The expert's opinions were used to frame a set of future research objectives to advance the development of CIA and improve its use in the EJ context. Specifically, the experts' recommendations addressed the need for regulatory impact analysis, the appropriate use of screening tool information and indexes, the role and measurement of nonchemical stressors, relevance of a risk modifier approach to CIA, inclusion of uncertainty and causality, metrics to assess effectiveness of interventions, and methods for community communication.
在美国一系列行政命令的推动下,美国环境保护局(USEPA)正在推广累积影响评估(CIA),以整合众多可能影响社区健康的因素,这些因素包括社会经济状况、既往健康状况等非化学应激源,以及许多历史上未被USEPA的化学风险评估范式所涵盖的其他因素。要了解所有应激源对环境暴露反应的累积影响,需要社会科学家、经济学家和其他传统上未参与化学风险评估的人员提供多学科的意见。为了收集这些学科的意见,13位独立专家组成的小组,他们分别以社会科学家、经济学家、公共卫生专家或决策分析师的身份参与了关于CIA的虚拟研讨会,以获取他们对CIA关键方面的看法。这些独立专家在研究弱势群体累积影响和环境正义(EJ)方面拥有数十年经验,他们匿名回答了针对其专业领域的特定问题,然后被要求审查并评论本学科内外其他人的回答。作者将问题和回答整理成一般主题(如筛选工具和指标、非化学应激源在累积影响中的作用、不确定性),并总结了四个学科之间和内部的讨论。专家们的意见被用于制定一系列未来研究目标,以推动CIA的发展,并改善其在EJ背景下的应用。具体而言,专家们的建议涉及监管影响分析的必要性、筛选工具信息和指标的适当使用、非化学应激源的作用和测量、风险修正方法与CIA的相关性、不确定性和因果关系的纳入、评估干预措施有效性的指标以及社区沟通方法。