Naganuma Makoto, Shiga Hisashi, Shimoda Masayuki, Matsuura Minoru, Takenaka Kento, Fujii Toshimitsu, Yamamoto Shojiro, Matsubayashi Mao, Kobayashi Taku, Aoyama Nobuo, Saito Daisuke, Yokoyama Kaoru, Moriya Kei, Tsuchiya Kiichiro, Shibui Shunsuke, Kawamoto Ami, Shimizu Hiromichi, Okamoto Ryuichi, Sakamoto Kazuki, Yaguchi Katsuki, Kunisaki Reiko, Akiyama Shintaro, Hayashi Ryohei, Hasui Keisuke, Kanmura Shuji, Bamba Shigeki, Mishima Yoshiyuki, Kakimoto Kazuki, Sugimoto Shinya, Nakazawa Atsushi, Abe Takayuki, Ogata Haruhiko, Hisamatsu Tadakazu
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr;60(4):430-441. doi: 10.1007/s00535-025-02216-0. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
Despite the availability of several biologics for ulcerative colitis (UC), there remains a critical need to identify first-line treatment biologics. The superiority of infliximab (IFX) over vedolizumab (VED) and ustekinumab (UST) was evaluated as initial UC treatments in patients with biologic-naïve UC.
This multicenter, randomized control trial was conducted across 20 Japanese medical institutions. An independent center randomly allocated patients with UC (Mayo score ≥ 6) who had not previously used biologics to three treatment groups (IFX, VED, UST). The primary endpoint was the clinical remission (CR) rate at week 12, with other endpoints including the treatment continuation rate at week 26 and adverse events (AEs).
From May 2021 to June 2023, 107 cases were registered, including 104 for safety and 97 for efficacy evaluation. CR rate at week 12 was 36.4% (95%CI:20.4-54.9), 32.4% (95%CI:17.4-50.5) and 43.3% (95%CI:25.5-62.6) in IFX, VED, and UST group, respectively. Continuation rates at week 26 were 50.0%(IFX), 58.3% (VED), and 82.4% (UST). AEs related to study medication were 14.7% (IFX), 16.7% (VED), and 5.9% (UST). Predictors for CR at week 12 were thiopurine use in IFX (p = 0.04), lower baseline Mayo score (p = 0.007), and lower Patient report outcome 2 (p = 0.003) at week 2 in VED.
Due to small sample size, it is challenging to make conclusions for main endpoints from this study while our study suggested that use of thiopurines in IFX group and lower activity at enrollment in VED group may enhance treatment efficacy. (jRCT1031200329; available at https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ).
尽管有多种生物制剂可用于治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC),但仍迫切需要确定一线治疗生物制剂。在初治UC患者中,评估了英夫利昔单抗(IFX)相对于维多珠单抗(VED)和乌司奴单抗(UST)作为初始UC治疗的优越性。
这项多中心随机对照试验在20家日本医疗机构进行。一个独立中心将既往未使用过生物制剂的UC患者(梅奥评分≥6)随机分配到三个治疗组(IFX、VED、UST)。主要终点是第12周时的临床缓解(CR)率,其他终点包括第26周时的治疗持续率和不良事件(AE)。
2021年5月至2023年6月,共登记107例,其中104例用于安全性评估,97例用于疗效评估。IFX组、VED组和UST组第12周时的CR率分别为36.4%(95%CI:20.4 - 54.9)、32.4%(95%CI:17.4 - 50.5)和43.3%(95%CI:25.5 - 62.6)。第26周时的持续率分别为50.0%(IFX)、58.3%(VED)和82.4%(UST)。与研究药物相关的AE发生率分别为14.7%(IFX)、16.7%(VED)和5.9%(UST)。第12周时CR的预测因素为IFX组使用硫唑嘌呤(p = 0.04)、VED组第2周时较低的基线梅奥评分(p = 0.007)和较低的患者报告结局2(p = 0.003)。
由于样本量小,难以从本研究中就主要终点得出结论,不过我们的研究表明,IFX组使用硫唑嘌呤以及VED组入组时较低的疾病活动度可能会提高治疗效果。(jRCT1031200329;可在https://jrct.niph.go.jp/获取)