Hussain Kifah, Lee Kevin, Minga Iva, Wathen Lucas, Balasubramanian Senthil S, Vyas Natasha, Singh Lavisha, Shetty Mrinali, Rosenberg Jonathan R, Levisay Justin P, Karagodin Ilya, Liebelt Jared, Edelman Robert R, Ricciardi Mark J, Pursnani Amit
Advanced Cardiac Imaging, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar;41(3):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03333-w. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
This study aims to evaluate the implementation of concomitant CAD assessment on pre-TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) planning CTA (CT angiography) aided by CT-FFR (CT-fractional flow reserve) [The CT2TAVI protocol] and investigates the incremental value of CT-FFR to coronary CT angiography (CCTA) alone in the evaluation of patients undergoing CT2TAVI. This is a prospective observational real-world cohort study at an academic health system on consecutive patients who underwent CTA for TAVI planning from 1/2021 to 6/2022. This represented a transition period in our health system, from not formally reporting CAD on pre-TAVI planning CTA (Group A) to routinely reporting CAD on pre-TAVI CTA (Group B; CT2TAVI protocol). All CTAs were retrospective ECG-gated using a dual source 192 slice CT scanner without nitrate or intravenous beta blocker premedication. We assessed downstream ICA and revascularization pre-TAVI and clinical outcomes 30 days and 1 year post-TAVI in both groups. 307 patients were included with 199 patients in Group A and 108 patients in Group B. In Group B, ICA was performed pre-TAVI in only 40.7% of patients. The use of CT-FFR, which was primarily aimed at identifying hemodynamically significant proximal vessel disease, helped avoid downstream invasive testing for 60.5% (23/38) of patients who were deemed to have obstructive proximal vessel disease using CCTA alone or had one or more uninterpretable proximal segments using CCTA. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and need for revascularization at 1-year post-TAVI were comparable between groups with a higher trend toward heart failure hospitalizations in Group A. Routine ICA can safely be deferred pre-TAVI, with the CT2TAVI strategy using modern CT scanners aided by CT-FFR analysis.
本研究旨在评估在CT-FFR(CT血流储备分数)辅助下的[CT2TAVI方案]对经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)术前规划CT血管造影(CTA)进行同步CAD评估的实施情况,并研究CT-FFR相对于单独冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)在评估接受CT2TAVI的患者中的增量价值。这是一项在学术健康系统中针对2021年1月至2022年6月期间因TAVI规划而接受CTA的连续患者进行的前瞻性观察性真实世界队列研究。这代表了我们健康系统中的一个过渡时期,从不正式报告TAVI术前规划CTA上的CAD(A组)到常规报告TAVI术前CTA上的CAD(B组;CT2TAVI方案)。所有CTA均使用双源192层CT扫描仪进行回顾性心电门控,无需使用硝酸酯类药物或静脉注射β受体阻滞剂进行预处理。我们评估了两组患者TAVI术前的下游有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)和血运重建情况以及TAVI术后30天和1年的临床结局。共纳入307例患者,其中A组199例,B组108例。在B组中,仅40.7%的患者在TAVI术前进行了ICA。CT-FFR主要用于识别血流动力学上有意义的近端血管疾病,对于单独使用CCTA被认为有近端血管阻塞性疾病或使用CCTA有一个或多个无法解释的近端节段的患者,CT-FFR帮助避免了60.5%(23/38)的患者进行下游侵入性检查。TAVI术后1年的全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、心肌梗死和血运重建需求在两组之间相当,A组心力衰竭住院趋势更高。使用现代CT扫描仪并借助CT-FFR分析的CT2TAVI策略可安全地在TAVI术前推迟常规ICA。