Cheng Yuqi, Wu Dawei, Wu Ying, Guo Youcai, Cui Xinze, Zhang Pengquan, Gao Jie, Fu Yanming, Wang Xin
School of Exercise and Health, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang, China.
School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0315454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315454. eCollection 2025.
Balance is crucial for various athletic tasks, and accurately assessing balance ability among elite athletes using simple and accessible measurement methods is a significant challenge in sports science. A common approach to balance assessment involves recording center of pressure (CoP) displacements using force platforms, with various indicators proposed to distinguish subtle balance differences. However, these indicators have not reached a consensus, and it remains unclear whether these analyses alone can fully explain the complex interactions of postural control. In this study, we investigated four parameters related to balance control-anterior-posterior (AP) displacement, medial-lateral (ML) displacement, length, and tilt angle-in 13 elite athletes and 12 freestyle skiing aerial expert athletes. Data were recorded during 30-second trials on both soft and hard support surfaces, with eyes open and closed. We calculated the CMCI and used four machine learning algorithms-Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine(SVM), Naive Bayes, and Ranking Forest-to combine these features and assess each participant's balance ability. A classic train-test split method was applied, and the performance of different classifiers was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC) analysis. The ROC results showed that traditional time-domain features were insufficient for accurately distinguishing athletes' balance abilities, whereas CMCI performed the best overall. Among all classifiers, the combination of CMCI and Ranking Forest yielded the best performance, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.35. This nonlinear, multidimensional approach appears to be highly suitable for assessing the complexity of postural control.
平衡对于各种体育任务至关重要,而使用简单且易于获取的测量方法准确评估精英运动员的平衡能力是体育科学中的一项重大挑战。平衡评估的一种常见方法是使用测力平台记录压力中心(CoP)位移,并提出了各种指标来区分细微的平衡差异。然而,这些指标尚未达成共识,而且仅靠这些分析是否能够充分解释姿势控制的复杂相互作用仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了13名精英运动员和12名自由式滑雪空中技巧专家运动员与平衡控制相关的四个参数——前后(AP)位移、内外侧(ML)位移、长度和倾斜角度。在睁眼和闭眼的情况下,在软质和硬质支撑表面上进行30秒的测试时记录数据。我们计算了CMCI,并使用四种机器学习算法——逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)、朴素贝叶斯和排序森林——来组合这些特征并评估每个参与者的平衡能力。应用了经典的训练-测试分割方法,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估不同分类器的性能。ROC结果表明,传统的时域特征不足以准确区分运动员的平衡能力,而CMCI总体表现最佳。在所有分类器中,CMCI和排序森林的组合性能最佳,灵敏度为0.95,特异性为0.35。这种非线性、多维度的方法似乎非常适合评估姿势控制的复杂性。