• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭参与以网络为基础的家庭干预改善健康状况的经历:定性系统文献综述

Families' Experiences With Family-Focused Web-Based Interventions for Improving Health: Qualitative Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Zhu Diana, Dordevic Aimee L, Davidson Zoe E, Gibson Simone

机构信息

Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 30;27:e58774. doi: 10.2196/58774.

DOI:10.2196/58774
PMID:39883928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11826954/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth interventions can favorably impact health outcomes and encourage health-promoting behaviors in children. More insight is needed from the perspective of children and their families regarding eHealth interventions, including features influencing program effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to explore families' experiences with family-focused web-based interventions for improving health.

METHODS

Five databases were searched on October 26, 2022-updated on October 24, 2023-for studies reporting qualitative data on participating children or their caregivers' experiences with web-based programs. Study identification was performed in duplicate and studies were independently appraised for quality. Thematic synthesis was undertaken on qualitative data extracted from the results section of each included article.

RESULTS

Of 5524 articles identified, 28 articles were included. The studies examined the experiences of school-aged children (aged 5-18 years) and their caregivers (mostly mothers) with 26 web-based interventions that were developed to manage 17 different health conditions or influence health-supporting behaviors. Six themes were identified on families' experiences: connecting with others, agency of learning, program reputability or credibility, program flexibility, meeting participants' needs regarding program content or delivery, and impact on lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

Families positively perceived family-focused web-based interventions, finding value in quality connections and experiencing social support; intervention features aligned with behavioral and self-management principles. Key considerations were highlighted for program developers and health care professionals on ways to adapt eHealth elements to meet families' health-related needs. Continued research examining families' experiences with eHealth interventions is needed, including the experiences of families from diverse populations and distinguishing the perspectives of children, their caregivers, and other family members, to inform the expansion of family-focused eHealth interventions in health care systems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022363874; https://tinyurl.com/3xxa8enz.

摘要

背景

电子健康干预措施可以对健康结果产生积极影响,并鼓励儿童养成促进健康的行为。需要从儿童及其家庭的角度对电子健康干预措施有更多的了解,包括影响项目效果的特征。

目的

本综述旨在探讨家庭参与以家庭为中心的基于网络的健康改善干预措施的体验。

方法

于2022年10月26日检索了五个数据库,并于2023年10月24日进行更新,以查找报告参与项目的儿童或其照顾者对基于网络项目体验的定性数据的研究。研究识别工作由两人独立进行,研究质量由两人独立评估。对从每篇纳入文章的结果部分提取的定性数据进行主题综合分析。

结果

在识别出的5524篇文章中,纳入了28篇文章。这些研究调查了学龄儿童(5至18岁)及其照顾者(大多为母亲)对26种基于网络的干预措施的体验,这些干预措施旨在管理17种不同的健康状况或影响健康支持行为。在家庭体验方面确定了六个主题:与他人建立联系、学习自主性、项目声誉或可信度、项目灵活性、满足参与者对项目内容或实施方式的需求以及对生活方式的影响。

结论

家庭对以家庭为中心的基于网络的干预措施持积极看法,认为高质量的联系有价值并体验到社会支持;干预措施的特征符合行为和自我管理原则。为项目开发者和医疗保健专业人员强调了关键考虑因素,即如何调整电子健康元素以满足家庭的健康相关需求。需要继续开展研究,考察家庭对电子健康干预措施的体验,包括不同人群家庭的体验,并区分儿童、其照顾者和其他家庭成员的观点,以为医疗保健系统中以家庭为中心的电子健康干预措施的扩展提供信息。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42022363874;https://tinyurl.com/3xxa8enz 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af10/11826954/6ed3c4bb4836/jmir_v27i1e58774_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af10/11826954/6ed3c4bb4836/jmir_v27i1e58774_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af10/11826954/6ed3c4bb4836/jmir_v27i1e58774_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Families' Experiences With Family-Focused Web-Based Interventions for Improving Health: Qualitative Systematic Literature Review.家庭参与以网络为基础的家庭干预改善健康状况的经历:定性系统文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 30;27:e58774. doi: 10.2196/58774.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
4
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
5
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Child, family and professional views on valued communication outcomes for non-verbal children with neurodisability: A qualitative meta-synthesis.儿童、家庭和专业人员对神经发育障碍的非言语儿童有价值的沟通结果的看法:定性元分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2946-2984. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13121. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring patient perspectives on how they can and should be engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in health care.探讨患者对如何以及应该参与医疗人工智能(AI)应用开发的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):1163. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10098-2.
2
Evaluating Human Papillomavirus eHealth in Hmong Adolescents to Promote Vaccinations: Pilot Feasibility Study.评估苗族青少年人乳头瘤病毒电子健康促进疫苗接种情况:试点可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 20;7:e38388. doi: 10.2196/38388.
3
Technology supports me: Perceptions of the benefits of digital technology in adolescents.
科技支撑着我:青少年对数字技术益处的认知
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 30;13:970395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970395. eCollection 2022.
4
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
5
"Therapy without a therapist?" The experiences of adolescents and their parents of online behavioural activation for depression with and without therapist support.“没有治疗师的治疗?”有和没有治疗师支持的青少年及其父母对在线行为激活治疗抑郁症的体验。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;33(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02142-7. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
6
A Rapid Review of the Impact of Family-Based Digital Interventions for Obesity Prevention and Treatment on Obesity-Related Outcomes in Primary School-Aged Children.家庭为基础的数字干预对肥胖预防和治疗的影响的快速综述:对小学年龄段儿童肥胖相关结局的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 15;14(22):4837. doi: 10.3390/nu14224837.
7
Characterizing User Engagement With a Digital Intervention for Pain Self-management Among Youth With Sickle Cell Disease and Their Caregivers: Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.描述数字干预在镰状细胞病患儿及其照顾者疼痛自我管理中的用户参与情况:一项随机对照试验的亚组分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e40096. doi: 10.2196/40096.
8
Understanding parent perspectives on engagement with online youth-focused mental health programs.了解家长对参与以青少年为重点的在线心理健康项目的看法。
Psychol Health. 2024 May;39(5):613-630. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2090561. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
9
A pilot feasibility and acceptability study of an Internet-delivered psychosocial intervention to reduce postoperative pain in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion.一项关于通过互联网提供心理社会干预以减轻接受脊柱融合手术的青少年术后疼痛的试点可行性和可接受性研究。
Can J Pain. 2022 Apr 13;6(1):12-23. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2021.2009334. eCollection 2022.
10
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.