Green David B, Bender Shane A, Acker Iii Gustaf M Van, Hill Hannah E, Kilgore Kevin L, Bhadra Niloy, Vrabec Tina L
MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio, The MetroHealth System & Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109, United States of America.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America.
J Neural Eng. 2025 Feb 12;22(1). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb07b.
. Direct current (DC) electrical block of peripheral nerve conduction shows promise for clinical applications to treat spasticity, pain, and cardiac arrhythmias. Most previous work has used invasive nerve cuffs. Here we investigate the potential of non-invasive transcutaneous DC motor block (tDCB).. In anesthetized rats, force output from the tibialis and peroneus muscles was measured in response to stimulation proximally on the sciatic nerve. DC blocking waveforms were delivered via a surface electrode placed distally on the skin over the common peroneal nerve. The efficacy of the block was observed as the reduction/abolition of muscle force. Experiments using this model were performed with two different electrode types. A range of DC amplitudes and durations were used to elucidate the temporal properties of block.. Higher levels of DC resulted in a larger block percentage. The amount of time needed to induce block depended on the level of DC, with smaller amplitudes resulting in longer induction times. When block was applied for a longer period of time (120s), the block was sustained following DC delivery. This 'recovery period' was longer for higher amplitudes of block. In addition to the block thresholds and temporal effects, two additional evaluations were made: In some animals the efficacy of tDCB to block tetanic muscle contractions was successfully verified. Finally, the effect of tDCB on the stability of nerve conduction was verified using a second distal electrode for comparison.. In this study, tDCB has been shown to reversibly block action potentials in peripheral motor nerves. A subthreshold amplitude applied for a longer duration could produce complete or partial block following a brief induction time. Also, a higher amplitude was associated with a longer recovery time. These temporal properties are important considerations for potential clinical applications.
外周神经传导的直流电(DC)阻断在治疗痉挛、疼痛和心律失常的临床应用中显示出前景。以往的大多数研究使用的是侵入性神经袖套。在此,我们研究非侵入性经皮直流运动阻断(tDCB)的潜力。
在麻醉的大鼠中,测量胫前肌和腓骨肌对坐骨神经近端刺激的力输出。直流阻断波形通过置于腓总神经上方皮肤远端的表面电极传递。通过肌肉力量的降低/消失来观察阻断的效果。使用该模型进行的实验采用了两种不同类型的电极。使用一系列直流幅度和持续时间来阐明阻断的时间特性。
较高水平的直流电导致更大的阻断百分比。诱导阻断所需的时间取决于直流电的水平,幅度越小,诱导时间越长。当阻断施加较长时间(120秒)时,在直流电施加后阻断得以维持。对于较高幅度的阻断,这个“恢复期”更长。除了阻断阈值和时间效应外,还进行了另外两项评估:在一些动物中,成功验证了tDCB阻断强直肌收缩的效果。最后,使用第二个远端电极进行比较,验证了tDCB对神经传导稳定性的影响。
在本研究中,已证明tDCB可在外周运动神经中可逆地阻断动作电位。在短暂的诱导时间后,施加较长持续时间的阈下幅度可产生完全或部分阻断。此外,较高的幅度与较长的恢复时间相关。这些时间特性是潜在临床应用的重要考虑因素。