Machado Lara Coutinho, Martins Bruno Costa, de Lima Marcelo Simas, Geiger Sebastian, Lenz Luciano, de Paulo Gustavo Andrade, Safatle-Ribeiro Adriana, Ribeiro Ulysses, Maluf-Filho Fauze
Cancer Institute of the University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar;70(3):1223-1232. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08853-y. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
Endoscopic biliary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) is the preferred palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Recent advances in the treatment have prolonged survival, thus, increasing the chance of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after SEMS placement. The aim of this study was to compare different endoscopic approaches in patients with a SEMS and RBO, regarding clinical success and time to RBO.
This retrospective study included all patients with a SEMS placed because of malignant biliary strictures who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between January 2011 and December 2018. We evaluated the results of different endoscopic interventions to RBO, including insertion of a new SEMS, stent cleaning, and insertion of a plastic stent (PS).
From January 2011 to December 2018, 70 (22.4%) patients developed RBO requiring endoscopic reintervention (n = 105 sessions). From the 105 ERCPs, technical success, clinical success, and adverse events rates were 91,4%, 71,8%, and 7,8%, respectively. Younger age (OR = 1.11 95%CI: 1.03-1.19) and the finding of a patent SEMS (OR = 0.17 95%CI: 0.04-0.08) were predictors of clinical failure (P = 0.006 and P = 0.024, respectively). The mean patency time (in days) after endoscopic reintervention was greater for SEMSs than for PSs (417.2 [95% CI: 250.0-584.4] vs 175.2 [95% CI: 124.0-226.5], P = 0.002).
Correct identification and treatment of the causal factor of RBO typically lead to technical and clinical success. Placement of a second SEMS provides longer patency compared to a plastic stent if ingrowth (overgrowth) occurs.
放置自膨式金属支架(SEMS)的内镜下胆道引流是恶性胆道梗阻的首选姑息治疗方法。该治疗方法的最新进展延长了患者生存期,因此增加了SEMS置入后复发性胆道梗阻(RBO)的发生几率。本研究旨在比较不同内镜治疗方法用于SEMS置入后并发RBO患者的临床成功率及RBO复发时间。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年1月至2018年12月期间因恶性胆道狭窄而放置SEMS并接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的所有患者。我们评估了针对RBO的不同内镜干预结果,包括置入新的SEMS、支架清理以及置入塑料支架(PS)。
2011年1月至2018年12月期间,70例(22.4%)患者出现RBO,需要进行内镜再干预(共105次操作)。在这105次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中,技术成功率、临床成功率及不良事件发生率分别为91.4%、71.8%和7.8%。年龄较小(比值比[OR]=1.11,95%置信区间[CI]:1.03-1.19)以及发现SEMS通畅(OR=0.17,95%CI:0.04-0.08)是临床治疗失败的预测因素(P值分别为0.006和0.024)。内镜再干预后的平均通畅时间(以天计),SEMS组比PS组长(417.2[95%CI:250.0-584.4]对175.2[95%CI:124.0-226.5],P=0.002)。
正确识别和治疗RBO的病因通常会带来技术和临床成功。如果发生向内生长(过度生长),与塑料支架相比,置入第二个SEMS可提供更长的通畅时间。