Blanchard R L, Hahne R M, Kahn B, McCurdy D, Mellor R A, Moore W S, Sedlet J, Whittaker E
Health Phys. 1985 May;48(5):587-600. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198505000-00003.
Radiological sampling and analysis performed under the National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations were evaluated for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Drinking Water to consider whether any changes should be recommended. The authors reviewed the analytical screening scheme; sample collection, storage and analysis procedures; selection of analytical methods; reliability of results; and possible future needs. The main problem in the program has been dependence on a screening scheme of gross alpha-particle activity measurement and 226Ra analysis for predicting elevated 228Ra levels to determine compliance with the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for Ra. In some aquifers, 228Ra levels have been found to be unrelated to 226Ra levels. Several alternatives are discussed to eliminate this problem. A secondary problem is that the measurement for assuring compliance with the MCL for gross alpha-particle activity minus Ra, Rn and U uses chemical U analysis and assumes equilibrium of 238U and 234U. Because some ground waters are known to be at disequilibrium, radiometric U analysis is needed for those gross alpha-particle activities and chemical U values that could result in an erroneous conclusion relative to the MCL. In addition, studies were recommended for determining analytical uncertainties and assuring reliable sampling and sample maintenance; improvements in the system for accepting methods were suggested; and methods were identified for several radionuclides not currently in the analytical program that may be needed to assure absence of elevated radiation doses and could be useful for identifying trace contaminants.
根据《国家临时饮用水法规》进行的放射学采样和分析,由美国环境保护局(EPA)饮用水办公室进行评估,以考虑是否应建议做出任何更改。作者回顾了分析筛选方案、样品采集、储存和分析程序、分析方法的选择、结果的可靠性以及未来可能的需求。该计划中的主要问题一直是依赖总α粒子活度测量和226Ra分析的筛选方案来预测228Ra水平升高,以确定是否符合镭的最大污染物水平(MCL)。在一些含水层中,已发现228Ra水平与226Ra水平无关。讨论了几种消除该问题的替代方案。第二个问题是,为确保符合总α粒子活度减去镭、氡和铀的MCL的测量使用化学铀分析,并假设238U和234U处于平衡状态。由于已知一些地下水处于非平衡状态,对于那些可能导致相对于MCL得出错误结论的总α粒子活度和化学铀值,需要进行放射性铀分析。此外,建议开展研究以确定分析不确定性并确保可靠的采样和样品维护;建议改进方法接受系统;并确定了几种目前不在分析计划中的放射性核素的方法,这些方法可能需要确保不存在辐射剂量升高的情况,并且可能有助于识别痕量污染物。