• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进儿童和青少年心理健康的社会处方实施的障碍和促进因素:来自一线的观点。

Barriers and facilitators to social prescribing in child and youth mental health: perspectives from the frontline.

机构信息

Evidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, England.

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, England.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1465-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x
PMID:37405485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098893/
Abstract

There is growing interest in the role of Social Prescribing (SP) to help promote mental well-being and support individuals with mental health difficulties. Yet, implementation of SP to children and young people (CYP) has proved slow and underdeveloped compared with adult populations. Understanding the barriers and facilitators will help key stakeholders to better embed SP for CYP into practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive, theoretical-led framework, underpinned by 33 behaviour change theories and 128 constructs, perceived barriers and facilitators to SP were investigated. The sample comprised of 11 Link Workers and 9 individuals involved in facilitating SP with CYP, who took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis, and themes were coded under each theoretical domain. Overall, 33 barriers and facilitators for SP were identified across 12 domains of the TDF. Under capability, barriers and facilitators were found for knowledge, skills, memory/attention/decision making processes, and behavioural regulation. For opportunity, barriers and facilitators were found for social/professional influences, as well as environmental context and resources. Finally, for motivation, domains covered included: beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, motivations/goals, reinforcement, and emotions. Findings suggest that a wide range of barriers and facilitators affect the implementation of CYP SP to improve mental health and well-being. Interventions which target different domains related to capability, opportunity and motivation should be developed to better facilitate CYP SP.

摘要

人们对社会处方(SP)在促进心理健康和支持有心理健康困难的个人方面的作用越来越感兴趣。然而,与成年人群体相比,SP 在儿童和青少年(CYP)中的实施速度缓慢且欠发达。了解障碍和促进因素将帮助主要利益相关者更好地将 CYP 的 SP 纳入实践。本研究使用理论领域框架(TDF),这是一个全面的、理论导向的框架,由 33 个行为改变理论和 128 个构念支撑,调查了 SP 的障碍和促进因素。样本包括 11 名联络工作者和 9 名参与促进 CYP 社会处方的人,他们参加了半结构化访谈。使用演绎主题分析对转录本进行分析,并根据每个理论领域对主题进行编码。总体而言,在 TDF 的 12 个领域中确定了 33 个 SP 的障碍和促进因素。在能力方面,发现了知识、技能、记忆/注意力/决策过程和行为调节方面的障碍和促进因素。在机会方面,发现了社会/专业影响以及环境背景和资源方面的障碍和促进因素。最后,在动机方面,涵盖了以下领域:对后果的信念、对能力的信念、乐观、动机/目标、强化和情绪。研究结果表明,广泛的障碍和促进因素影响着实施 CYP SP 以改善心理健康和幸福感。应该开发针对能力、机会和动机相关不同领域的干预措施,以更好地促进 CYP SP。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to social prescribing in child and youth mental health: perspectives from the frontline.促进儿童和青少年心理健康的社会处方实施的障碍和促进因素:来自一线的观点。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1465-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework.儿童和青少年心理健康中共享决策的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的临床医生观点。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 May;28(5):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1230-0. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Safewards in acute medical/surgical care wards: Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model and Theoretical Domains Framework analysis.急危重症医学/外科病房的安全保障:能力、机会、动机和行为模型以及理论领域框架分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104719. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based physical activity policy in Canada: application of the theoretical domains framework.加拿大实施校本体育活动政策的障碍与促进因素:理论领域框架的应用
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4846-y.
5
Key influences on university students' physical activity: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour.关键影响因素大学生的身体活动:使用理论领域框架和人类行为的 COM-B 模型进行系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4.
6
Exploring barriers and facilitators for mental health professionals delivering behavioural activation to young people with depression: qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.探索心理健康专业人员为抑郁症青少年提供行为激活疗法的障碍与促进因素:运用理论领域框架的定性研究
BJPsych Open. 2022 Feb 4;8(2):e38. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.7.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementing the CURE stop smoking project: a qualitative study.实施 CURE 戒烟项目的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 20;21(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06504-2.
8
Improving medication dispensing and counselling for patients with vision impairment: a qualitative study of pharmacist-reported barriers and facilitators.改善视力障碍患者的药物调配与咨询服务:一项关于药剂师报告的障碍与促进因素的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11009-9.
9
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis.运用理论领域框架探讨临床试验中医护人员行为改变的障碍与促进因素:个体化低温血液透析试验的案例研究
Trials. 2017 May 22;18(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1965-9.
10
Applying the theoretical domains framework to identify determinants to mental healthcare use among older African Americans with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.运用理论领域框架识别 2 型糖尿病老年非裔美国人心理健康保健使用的决定因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e073689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073689.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the active ingredients and contextual factors of social prescribing when used to support the mental health of children and young people: a qualitative study.确定社会处方用于支持儿童和青少年心理健康时的活性成分和背景因素:一项定性研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02734-5.
2
Relative socio-economic position and meaning and purpose in life in adolescents: An intangible cost of social inequalities.青少年的相对社会经济地位以及生活的意义和目的:社会不平等的一种无形代价。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 12;30:101776. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101776. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Co-designing implementation strategies for social prescribing in Lancashire and South Cumbria: a qualitative study with a participatory approach.共同设计兰开夏郡和南坎布里亚郡社会处方的实施策略:一项采用参与式方法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 2;15(4):e094522. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094522.
4
Hospital in-reach family-centred social prescribing pilot for children with neurodisability: mixed methods evaluation with social return on investment analysis.针对神经残疾儿童的医院内家庭中心社会处方试点项目:采用混合方法评估并进行社会投资回报分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12329-0.
5
Development of a new social prescribing intervention for families of children with cerebral palsy.为脑瘫儿童家庭开发一种新的社会处方干预措施。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Feb;67(2):223-234. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16039. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
6
Implementing a social prescribing program in primary care units in Portugal: A qualitative study exploring enablers, barriers and lessons learned from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the program implementation.在葡萄牙的基层医疗单位实施社会处方计划:一项从参与该计划实施的利益相关者角度探索促进因素、障碍和经验教训的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306404. eCollection 2024.
7
Improving the Scope of Child Mental Health Interventions in Our Modern World.改善现代世界儿童心理健康干预措施的范围。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;20(12):6149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126149.

本文引用的文献

1
Wellbeing while waiting evaluating social prescribing in CAMHS: study protocol for a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness study.等待时的幸福感评估:CAMHS 社会处方的混合 II 型实施-有效性研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 10;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04758-0.
2
Social prescribing for children and young people.针对儿童和青少年的社会处方。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Dec;6(12):835-837. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00248-6. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
3
Readability of Commonly Used Quality of Life Outcome Measures for Youth Self-Report.常用青少年自报告生活质量结局测量工具的可读性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159555.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health: a natural experiment.新冠疫情对青少年心理健康的影响:一项自然实验。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 27;9(4):211114. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211114. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Developing a social prescribing local system in a European Mediterranean country: a feasibility study to promote active and healthy aging.在一个欧洲地中海国家开发社会处方本地系统:促进积极健康老龄化的可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):1164. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07186-6.
6
How to manage endings in unsuccessful therapy: A qualitative comparison of youth and clinician perspectives.如何处理治疗失败的结局:青少年与临床医生观点的质性比较
Psychother Res. 2022 Feb;32(2):249-262. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.1921304. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
I-DECIDE: A Social Prescribing and Digital Intervention Protocol to Promote Sexual and Reproductive Health and Quality of Life among Young Cape Verdeans.I-DECIDE:一项促进佛得角年轻人生殖健康和生活质量的社会处方和数字干预方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;18(3):850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030850.
8
International consensus on a standard set of outcome measures for child and youth anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.儿童和青少年焦虑、抑郁、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的国际共识:一套标准的结局测量指标。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;8(1):76-86. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30356-4.
9
Social Prescribing-An Effort to Apply a Common Knowledge: Impelling Forces and Challenges.社会处方——应用常识的努力:驱动力与挑战
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;8:515469. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469. eCollection 2020.
10
Social prescribing for individuals with mental health problems: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers experienced by general practitioners.社会处方用于有心理健康问题的个体:全科医生经历的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 21;21(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01264-0.