Ma Chen, Fan Zhirong, Wang Xuan, Li Bian, Zhao Jingjing, Kang Xiaogang, Jiang Wen, Yang Fang
Department of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
General Medicine Department, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04050-6.
Early adequate feeding reduces mortality in patients with acute severe stroke. Supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) may address enteral nutrition (EN) deficiency and mitigate the risk of nosocomial infection. The benefit of the EN plus early SPN strategy over the full EN strategy is unknown in acute severe stroke patients.
We retrospectively enrolled 20 patients with acute severe stroke in the SPN group who received EN plus early SPN (more than 50% of the energy target within 72 h after admission). Forty control patients in the EN group who received full EN were matched by age, sex and lesion site. The time to new-onset pneumonia or nosocomial infections was analyzed by Student's t test and the Breslow generalized Wilcoxon test.
The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the SPN group and the EN group, except for higher serum leukocyte counts, neutrophil counts, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios in the SPN group (P < 0.05). Compared with that in the EN group, the time to new-onset pneumonia was significantly delayed in the SPN group (7.6 days vs. 5.2 days; mean difference, 2.5 days; 95% CI, 0.65 to 4.31; P = 0.009), as was the time to new-onset nosocomial infections (7.1 days vs. 4.8 days; mean difference, 2.3 days; 95% CI, 0.46 to 4.07; P = 0.015). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed similar cumulative probabilities of new-onset pneumonia and new-onset nosocomial infections in the two groups (P > 0.05). The rates of digestive intolerance events were similar between the two groups (40% in the SPN group vs. 52.5% in the EN group, P = 0.361).
In patients with acute severe stroke, the application of EN plus early SPN could delay the onset of pneumonia and nosocomial infections especially in the early phase.
早期充足喂养可降低急性重症卒中患者的死亡率。补充肠外营养(SPN)可解决肠内营养(EN)不足问题,并降低医院感染风险。在急性重症卒中患者中,EN联合早期SPN策略与全EN策略相比的益处尚不清楚。
我们回顾性纳入了SPN组20例急性重症卒中患者,这些患者接受了EN联合早期SPN(入院后72小时内达到能量目标值的50%以上)。通过年龄、性别和病变部位匹配了40例接受全EN的EN组对照患者。采用Student's t检验和Breslow广义Wilcoxon检验分析新发肺炎或医院感染的时间。
SPN组和EN组的基线特征无显著差异,但SPN组的血清白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值较高(P<0.05)。与EN组相比,SPN组新发肺炎的时间显著延迟(7.6天对5.2天;平均差异2.5天;95%CI,0.65至4.31;P = 0.009),新发医院感染的时间也显著延迟(7.1天对4.8天;平均差异2.3天;95%CI,0.46至4.07;P = 0.0�15)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示两组新发肺炎和新发医院感染的累积概率相似(P>0.05)。两组消化不耐受事件的发生率相似(SPN组为40%,EN组为52.5%,P = 0.361)。
在急性重症卒中患者中,应用EN联合早期SPN可延迟肺炎和医院感染的发生,尤其是在早期阶段。