Cengiz Saniye Merve, Goymen Merve
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Mersin University, Ciftlikkoy Campus, Yenisehir, Mersin, Türkiye.
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 1;15(1):3958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86345-9.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, pain, and satisfaction levels of patients treated with different thicknesses of clear aligners among class I maxillary mild crowding cases. Twenty-eight subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 were treated with 0.5 mm-thick aligners and group 2 were treated with 0.75 mm-thick aligners. Maxillary models were printed using a 3-dimensional printer and aligners were produced using a vacuum thermoforming machine. The amount of orthodontic tooth movement was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment digital models and lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning and end of the treatment. Pain and satisfaction levels were measured before aligner insertion, at the 4th hour, 2nd day, 1st week, 1st month and at the end of the treatment. Increases in maxillary intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths, and dental arch perimeter were significantly higher in group 2 (p < 0.05). The pain levels peaked at T1 and decreased gradually in both groups; group 2 demonstrated greater pain levels. Group 1 reported significantly greater satisfaction levels (p < 0.05). Aligner thickness is a key determinant of the extent of orthodontic tooth movement. Treatment with a 0.5 mm-thick aligner provides enhanced comfort for patients, but a 0.75 mm-thick aligner yields more efficient treatment results.Trial registration: The trial was registered on https://ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively with the registration number of NCT06504498, on 16/07/2024.
本研究旨在评估在I类上颌轻度拥挤病例中,使用不同厚度透明矫治器治疗的患者的疗效、疼痛程度和满意度。28名受试者被随机分为两组。第1组使用0.5毫米厚的矫治器进行治疗,第2组使用0.75毫米厚的矫治器进行治疗。使用三维打印机打印上颌模型,并使用真空热成型机制作矫治器。通过比较治疗前和治疗后的数字模型以及在治疗开始和结束时拍摄的头颅侧位片,评估正畸牙齿移动的量。在矫治器佩戴前、第4小时、第2天、第1周、第1个月以及治疗结束时测量疼痛程度和满意度。第2组上颌尖牙间、前磨牙间和磨牙间宽度以及牙弓周长的增加显著更高(p<0.05)。两组的疼痛程度在T1时达到峰值,随后逐渐下降;第2组的疼痛程度更高。第1组报告的满意度显著更高(p<0.05)。矫治器厚度是正畸牙齿移动程度的关键决定因素。使用0.5毫米厚的矫治器进行治疗可为患者提供更高的舒适度,但使用0.75毫米厚的矫治器可产生更有效的治疗效果。试验注册:该试验于2024年7月16日在https://ClinicalTrials.gov上进行了追溯注册,注册号为NCT06504498。