Suppr超能文献

白内障手术中增强型与单焦点人工晶状体的视觉及患者报告结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fernández Joaquín, Ribeiro Filomena, Burguera Noemí, Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora Marina, Rodríguez-Vallejo Manuel

机构信息

Qvision, Department of Ophthalmology, VITHAS Almería Hospital, Almería, Spain.

Departamento de Oftalmologia, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2025 Apr;39(5):883-898. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03625-4. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

Abstract

Understanding the functional outcomes achieved with new enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) is crucial for adequately managing patient expectations. This study evaluated visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced range of field IOL versus other monofocal IOLs in cataract patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis, pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024561611), included studies from Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and trial registries (2019-2024) focused on binocular cataract surgeries with various IOL models. Primary outcomes assessed were monocular distance-corrected visual acuities (CDVA, DCIVA, DCNVA), defocus curves, and contrast sensitivity; secondary measures included binocular visual acuities and patient-reported outcomes such as spectacle independence and photic phenomena. Out of 31 studies (8 randomized clinical trials, 23 case series), high-certainty evidence indicated no significant difference in CDVA between enhanced and conventional IOLs. However, enhanced IOLs demonstrated better intermediate (DCIVA: -0.11 logMAR, CI 95%: -0.13 to -0.10) and near (DCNVA: -0.12 logMAR, CI 95%: -0.17 to -0.07) visual acuities, supported by defocus curves, though with lower-certainty evidence. No significant differences were observed in contrast sensitivity or photic phenomena, and evidence for positive dysphotopsia was moderate to low. Enhanced IOLs significantly favored intermediate-distance spectacle independence, with an odds ratio of 7.85 (CI 95%: 4.08-15.09), though no differences were observed for distance spectacle independence. Near-distance spectacle independence also favored enhanced IOLs, though with low-certainty evidence. In summary, enhanced IOLs provide improved intermediate and near visual acuities compared to conventional monofocal IOLs, though further studies are needed to confirm outcomes in contrast sensitivity and patient-reported outcomes across various enhanced monofocal IOLs.

摘要

了解新型增强型单焦点人工晶状体(IOL)所实现的功能结果对于充分管理患者期望至关重要。本研究评估了增强型视野范围IOL与其他单焦点IOL在白内障患者中的视觉和患者报告结果。一项在PROSPERO(CRD42024561611)上预先注册的系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入了来自Medline(PubMed)、Embase(Ovid)和试验注册库(2019 - 2024年)的研究,这些研究聚焦于采用各种IOL模型的双眼白内障手术。评估的主要结果是单眼距离矫正视力(CDVA、DCIVA、DCNVA)、散焦曲线和对比敏感度;次要指标包括双眼视力以及患者报告的结果,如摆脱眼镜依赖和光现象。在31项研究(8项随机临床试验、23项病例系列)中,高确定性证据表明增强型IOL与传统IOL在CDVA方面无显著差异。然而,增强型IOL在中距离(DCIVA:-0.11 logMAR,95%CI:-0.13至-0.10)和近距离(DCNVA:-0.12 logMAR,95%CI:-0.17至-0.07)视力方面表现更好,散焦曲线也支持这一点,不过证据确定性较低。在对比敏感度或光现象方面未观察到显著差异,并且正性眩光的证据为中度至低度。增强型IOL在中距离摆脱眼镜依赖方面显著更具优势,优势比为7.85(95%CI:4.08 - 15.09),不过在远距离摆脱眼镜依赖方面未观察到差异。近距离摆脱眼镜依赖也有利于增强型IOL,不过证据确定性较低。总之,与传统单焦点IOL相比,增强型IOL可改善中距离和近距离视力,不过需要进一步研究以确认各种增强型单焦点IOL在对比敏感度和患者报告结果方面的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/998c/11933469/db5be3e6f8dd/41433_2025_3625_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验