• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

某机构开展全天候分娩硬膜外镇痛后分娩结局的渐进性变化:一项回顾性队列研究。

Progressive changes in delivery outcomes following the launch of round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia at an institution: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Tatsuki Onishi, Wakata Ryuichi, Hoshino Sayo, Kasai Kyomi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Adachi Hospital, Higashinotoin-Nijo-Kudaru, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto 604-0837, Japan; Faculty of Data Science, Shiga University, 1-1-1 Bamba, Hikone, Shiga 522-0069, Japan.

Department of Anesthesia, Adachi Hospital, Higashinotoin-Nijo-Kudaru, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto 604-0837, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Apr;307:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.041. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.041
PMID:39893790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency caesarean section is associated with maternal and foetal complications, potentially exacerbated by general anaesthesia use.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether labour epidural analgesia use affects caesarean section incidence.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective single-centre cohort study involved women in labour (n = 11,792) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. The primary outcome was caesarean section incidence, determined from electronic medical records; secondary outcome was caesarean section incidence change over time.

RESULTS

Of 5849 deliveries from 1 August 2018, when round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia became available, until 31 December 2021, 1,433 (24.5 %) involved labour epidural analgesia. Of these, 203 (14.2 %) involved unintended caesarean section, less than that in the non-labour epidural analgesia group (22.2 %) (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.55, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis, assuming 50 % of non-labour epidural analgesia cases should have had used labour epidural analgesia, yielded a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95 %CI: 0.57-0.75, p < 0.001). Propensity-score matching adjusted for possible confounders. Temporal changes in caesarean section incidence were analysed between 1 August 2018 and 31 October 2021. This passage of time explained the reduction in values for the difference-in-differences analysis by 20.5 % (95 %CI: 5.5-35.6, p = 0.007). Interrupted time series analysis revealed caesarean section incidence increased with time after round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia became available in the non-labour epidural analgesia group (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia use is associated with decreased caesarean section incidence, partly due to optimisation of eligibility criteria. Labour epidural analgesia use should be expanded to aid vaginal delivery and improve maternal well-being.

摘要

背景

急诊剖宫产与母婴并发症相关,全身麻醉的使用可能会加剧这些并发症。

目的

确定分娩时使用硬膜外镇痛是否会影响剖宫产发生率。

研究设计

这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了2015年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间分娩的女性(n = 11792)。主要结局是剖宫产发生率,通过电子病历确定;次要结局是剖宫产发生率随时间的变化。

结果

在2018年8月1日(此时开始提供全天候分娩硬膜外镇痛)至2021年12月31日的5849例分娩中,1433例(24.5%)使用了分娩硬膜外镇痛。其中,203例(14.2%)为意外剖宫产,低于非分娩硬膜外镇痛组(22.2%)(风险比:0.47;95%置信区间[CI]:0.41 - 0.55,p < 0.001)。敏感性分析假设50%的非分娩硬膜外镇痛病例本应使用分娩硬膜外镇痛,得出风险比为0.65(95%CI:0.57 - 0.75,p < 0.001)。倾向得分匹配对可能的混杂因素进行了调整。分析了2018年8月1日至2021年10月31日期间剖宫产发生率的时间变化。这段时间解释了差异分析值下降的20.5%(95%CI:5.5 - 35.6,p = 0.007)。中断时间序列分析显示,在非分娩硬膜外镇痛组中,全天候分娩硬膜外镇痛可用后,剖宫产发生率随时间增加(p = 0.01)。

结论

全天候使用分娩硬膜外镇痛与剖宫产发生率降低相关,部分原因是资格标准的优化。应扩大分娩硬膜外镇痛的使用,以帮助阴道分娩并改善产妇健康。

相似文献

1
Progressive changes in delivery outcomes following the launch of round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia at an institution: A retrospective cohort study.某机构开展全天候分娩硬膜外镇痛后分娩结局的渐进性变化:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Apr;307:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.041. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Epidural analgesia in labour and risk of caesarean delivery.分娩时的硬膜外镇痛与剖宫产风险
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;28(5):400-11. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12139. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
3
Association between epidural analgesia and indications for intrapartum caesarean delivery in group 1 of the 10-group classification system at a tertiary maternity hospital, Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国上海一家三级妇产医院 10 分组分类系统 1 组产妇行硬膜外分娩镇痛与剖宫产指征的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03925-z.
4
[Effects of double-catheter epidural analgesia by lidocaine injection respectively on the delivery outcomes and maternal-infant complications for persistent posterior or lateral occipital position of protracted active phase].利多卡因分别双侧导管硬膜外注射用于活跃期持续性枕后位或枕横位分娩结局及母婴并发症的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 25;55(7):457-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20191228-00705.
5
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
6
Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.分娩时联合脊髓硬膜外麻醉与硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.分娩时硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.
8
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.硬膜外麻醉产妇第二产程的体位
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4.
9
Prolonged duration of epidural labour analgesia decreases the success rate of epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.硬膜外分娩镇痛时间延长会降低剖宫产术硬膜外麻醉的成功率。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1112-1117. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2067353.
10
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour.分娩时硬膜外镇痛的早期与晚期启动
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 9;2014(10):CD007238. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007238.pub2.