Pedersen Jan Eilert, Eide Hilde, Sandsleth Marit Gjone, Taylor Ingrid, Førsund Linn Hege
Section for Health and Care, Haugmotun Care Center, Notodden Municipality, Norway.
Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern, Drammen, Norway.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb 2. doi: 10.1111/jan.16780.
To systematically identify, evaluate and synthesise the research literature about (a) the roles and responsibilities of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in the context of advance care planning (ACP) for older persons, (b) the characteristics of APNs' ACP practices and (c) the facilitators and barriers influencing APNs' involvement in ACP.
Mixed-methods systematic review.
Followed the mixed methods systematic review guidelines outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Three researchers independently screened studies for eligibility using the Covidence Screening Application. The screening involved two stages: titles and abstracts, followed by full-text evaluation. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. A convergent integrated synthesis combined quantitative and qualitative data by 'qualitising' quantitative findings into text, enabling integration and thematic analysis to synthesise the results.
Medline, CINAHL and Embase were searched from 2012 to 2024 for original research in English, focusing on APNs involved in ACP for individuals aged 65 or older, using qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs.
The review included 19 studies: seven qualitative, nine quantitative and three mixed method designs. Thematic analysis revealed that APNs play a key role in ACP, aligning care with patient preferences through discussions and documentation. Studies from the United States (12), United Kingdom (4), Canada (2) and Australia (1) show varying APN roles and responsibilities.
APNs are crucial to ACP, but barriers limit their impact. Overcoming these is key to improving outcomes.
APNs clinical expertise and close patient relationships are crucial for aligning care with patient preferences and needs in ACP. However, to fully maximise their contribution, it is essential to overcome barriers such as time constraints, lack of role recognition and insufficient training. Addressing these challenges will enhance the effectiveness of APNs in providing person-centred care.
This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.
No patient or public contribution.
系统识别、评估和综合关于以下方面的研究文献:(a) 高级实践护士 (APN) 在老年人预立医疗计划 (ACP) 背景下的角色和职责;(b) APN 的 ACP 实践特点;(c) 影响 APN 参与 ACP 的促进因素和障碍。
混合方法系统评价。
遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所概述的混合方法系统评价指南。三名研究人员使用Covidence筛选应用程序独立筛选研究的合格性。筛选包括两个阶段:标题和摘要,然后是全文评估。使用混合方法评估工具进行质量评估。收敛性综合合成通过将定量结果“定性化”为文本,将定量和定性数据结合起来,从而实现整合和主题分析以综合结果。
检索2012年至2024年的Medline、CINAHL和Embase,以查找英文原创研究,重点关注参与65岁及以上个体ACP的APN,采用定性、定量或混合方法设计。
该评价纳入19项研究:7项定性研究、9项定量研究和3项混合方法设计。主题分析表明,APN在ACP中发挥关键作用,通过讨论和记录使护理与患者偏好保持一致。来自美国(12项)、英国(4项)、加拿大(2项)和澳大利亚(1项)的研究显示了不同的APN角色和职责。
APN对ACP至关重要,但障碍限制了他们的影响。克服这些障碍是改善结果的关键。
APN的临床专业知识和与患者的密切关系对于在ACP中使护理与患者偏好和需求保持一致至关重要。然而,要充分发挥他们的作用,必须克服时间限制、缺乏角色认可和培训不足等障碍。应对这些挑战将提高APN提供以患者为中心护理的有效性。
本评价遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 声明。
无患者或公众参与。