D'Amato M R, Salmon D P, Colombo M
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Jan;11(1):35-51. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.11.1.35.
In Experiment 1, 8 monkeys, experimentally naive with regard to visual stimuli, were trained on identity matching with a two-sample set based on two-dimensional stimuli. On a subsequent test employing two new samples, 4 of the 8 applied the matching rule to the new sample stimuli (as defined by our transfer criterion), and 3 showed substantial savings in learning to match the new samples. Two of these 3 transferred the matching rule when given a second test with two new samples, and the third showed immediate and complete transfer when tested with a third pair of new stimuli. These results indicate a much stronger representation of the matching concept in monkeys than in pigeons, even when the conditions of assessment are reasonably comparable. In Experiment 2, however, 4 monkeys from Experiment 1 failed to transfer the matching rule to steady versus flashing green samples, indicating that the matching concept did not immediately extend beyond the general class of visual stimuli with which it was developed. These and related results in the literature suggest that representation of the matching concept in animals varies along a specificity-abstractness dimension, reflecting the degree to which the concept is tied to the conditions and context of its development.
在实验1中,8只从未接触过视觉刺激实验的猴子接受了基于二维刺激的双样本集身份匹配训练。在随后使用两个新样本的测试中,8只猴子中有4只将匹配规则应用于新的样本刺激(根据我们的迁移标准定义),3只在学习匹配新样本时表现出显著的节省。这3只猴子中有2只在接受第二次使用两个新样本的测试时迁移了匹配规则,第三只在使用第三对新刺激进行测试时立即完全迁移了匹配规则。这些结果表明,即使评估条件相当,猴子对匹配概念的表征也比鸽子更强。然而,在实验2中,实验1中的4只猴子未能将匹配规则迁移到稳定与闪烁的绿色样本上,这表明匹配概念并没有立即扩展到其形成时的一般视觉刺激类别之外。文献中的这些及相关结果表明,动物对匹配概念的表征在特异性 - 抽象性维度上存在差异,反映了该概念与形成条件和背景的关联程度。