Suppr超能文献

开发并验证一个用户友好型质量基准:提高面向患者和临床医生的在线健康信息的完整性。

Developing and Validating a User-Friendly Quality Benchmark: Enhancing the Integrity of Online Health Information for Patients and Clinicians.

作者信息

Daraz Lubna, Dogu Cicek

机构信息

School of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2025 Jan 31;12:23743735241309468. doi: 10.1177/23743735241309468. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The quality of online health information remains one of the leading causes in combating misinformation for patients and the public. However, assessing online health content is challenging for those without medical expertise. This article briefly outlines the development and validation of an evidence-based online health information evaluation tool. A systematic approach with five phases was adopted: (1) synthesizing the current state of the reliability of online health information, (2) conducting content analysis of existing quality assessment tools, (3) drafting a comprehensive list of quality criteria, (4) developing and validating a quality benchmark, and (5) disseminating the results. Collaborative input from healthcare providers, patients, caregivers, and the public developed and validated a quality benchmark. The quality benchmark consists of 5 quality criteria and 8 accompanying descriptions that define each quality criterion. A printable version of the benchmark is provided in the article to facilitate easy implementation by both patients and healthcare providers. The benchmark is recommended for use and intended to empower patients with a skill set to navigate through online misinformation, facilitating access to credible health information and promoting improved health outcomes.

摘要

在线健康信息的质量仍然是患者和公众对抗错误信息的主要原因之一。然而,对于没有医学专业知识的人来说,评估在线健康内容具有挑战性。本文简要概述了一种基于证据的在线健康信息评估工具的开发和验证过程。采用了一个分五个阶段的系统方法:(1)综合在线健康信息可靠性的当前状况,(2)对现有质量评估工具进行内容分析,(3)起草一份全面的质量标准清单,(4)制定和验证质量基准,以及(5)传播结果。医疗保健提供者、患者、护理人员和公众的协作投入制定并验证了质量基准。该质量基准由5个质量标准和8个伴随描述组成,这些描述定义了每个质量标准。文章中提供了该基准的可打印版本,以便患者和医疗保健提供者都能轻松实施。建议使用该基准,旨在使患者具备一套技能,以应对在线错误信息,便于获取可靠的健康信息并促进改善健康结果。

相似文献

1
Developing and Validating a User-Friendly Quality Benchmark: Enhancing the Integrity of Online Health Information for Patients and Clinicians.
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jan 31;12:23743735241309468. doi: 10.1177/23743735241309468. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing a Quality Benchmark for Determining the Credibility of Web Health Information- a Protocol of a Gold Standard Approach.
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 23;3:801204. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.801204. eCollection 2021.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Internet and information technology use in treatment of diabetes.
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2010 Feb(166):41-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02277.x.
9
Innovating Online Otolaryngology: The Development of the ENT Content Engagement and Quality Index for Audiovisual Material.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 28;16(2):e55195. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55195. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Assessing Credibility: Quality Criteria for Patients, Caregivers, and the Public in Online Health Information-A Qualitative Study.
J Patient Exp. 2024 May 31;11:23743735241259440. doi: 10.1177/23743735241259440. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Credibility: Quality Criteria for Patients, Caregivers, and the Public in Online Health Information-A Qualitative Study.
J Patient Exp. 2024 May 31;11:23743735241259440. doi: 10.1177/23743735241259440. eCollection 2024.
2
Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):544-561. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287654. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Developing a Quality Benchmark for Determining the Credibility of Web Health Information- a Protocol of a Gold Standard Approach.
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 23;3:801204. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.801204. eCollection 2021.
4
Stopping healthcare misinformation: The effect of financial incentives and legislation.
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):627-633. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
5
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
7
Assessment of Health Information About COVID-19 Prevention on the Internet: Infodemiological Study.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 1;6(2):e18717. doi: 10.2196/18717.
8
Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation.
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 18;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3.
9
A Call for a Public Health Agenda for Social Media Research.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 19;21(12):e16661. doi: 10.2196/16661.
10
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验