• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种连续视程人工晶状体的视觉效果与患者满意度

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses.

作者信息

Micheletti J Morgan, Hall Brad, Smiley Hayden G, Langston William J

机构信息

Berkeley Eye Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Sengi, Penniac, NB, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 29;19:309-316. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S504090. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S504090
PMID:39896313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11787775/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if visual outcomes with PanOptix are non-inferior to visual outcomes with Synergy.

METHODS

This was an ambispective, single center, comparative, bilateral, observational study. Patients received bilateral implantation with either PanOptix or Synergy intraocular lenses (IOLs) and were enrolled at least 5 months after surgeries. Patients with postoperative spherical equivalent ± 0.50D and astigmatism ≤ 0.75D in both eyes were enrolled. Postoperatively, patients were tested for binocular uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuities at distance, intermediate (60cm), and near (40cm and 33cm), binocular defocus curve, and were administered questionnaires about quality of vision (QUVID) and spectacle independence (IOLSAT).

RESULTS

A total of 230 subjects completed the study, 153 in the PanOptix group and 77 in the Synergy group. Non-inferiority of visual acuities were confirmed for all testing distances, with and without distance correction in place. No significant differences were observed for the binocular defocus curves (p > 0.05). Severity of starburst, halo, and glare were rated as "None" in 65% (98/150), 38% (58/152), and 48% (72/151) of subjects with the PanOptix Group, compared to 49% (37/76), 38% (29/77), and 55% (42/77) for the Synergy Group, respectively. The percentage of patients "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" with their vision was 89% (136/153) in the PanOptix group and 94% (72/77) in the Synergy group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest excellent visual acuities at distance, intermediate, and near, high spectacle independence, and high patient satisfaction with both the PanOptix and Synergy IOLs. The incidence of starbursts and blurred vision, as well as visual acuities at extreme near (33 cm), may be higher with the Synergy IOL.

摘要

目的

确定PanOptix人工晶状体的视觉效果是否不劣于Synergy人工晶状体的视觉效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性和前瞻性相结合的单中心、对比性、双侧观察性研究。患者接受PanOptix或Synergy人工晶状体的双侧植入,并在手术后至少5个月入组。纳入双眼术后等效球镜度±0.50D且散光≤0.75D的患者。术后,对患者进行远距离、中距离(60cm)和近距离(40cm和33cm)的双眼未矫正和矫正视力测试、双眼散焦曲线测试,并发放关于视觉质量(QUVID)和眼镜依赖程度(IOLSAT)的问卷。

结果

共有230名受试者完成了研究,其中PanOptix组153名,Synergy组77名。在所有测试距离下,无论是否进行距离矫正,均证实了视力的非劣效性。双眼散焦曲线未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。PanOptix组65%(98/150)、38%(58/152)和48%(72/151)的受试者将星芒、光晕和眩光的严重程度评为“无”,而Synergy组分别为49%(37/76)、38%(29/77)和55%(42/77)。PanOptix组中对视力“满意”或“非常满意”的患者比例为89%(136/153),Synergy组为94%(72/77)。

结论

本研究结果表明,PanOptix和Synergy人工晶状体在远距离、中距离和近距离均具有出色的视力,眼镜依赖程度高,患者满意度高。Synergy人工晶状体的星芒和视物模糊发生率以及极近距离(33cm)的视力可能更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1c/11787775/1fa6cbf94099/OPTH-19-309-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1c/11787775/920210d676c7/OPTH-19-309-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1c/11787775/1fa6cbf94099/OPTH-19-309-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1c/11787775/920210d676c7/OPTH-19-309-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1c/11787775/1fa6cbf94099/OPTH-19-309-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses.两种连续视程人工晶状体的视觉效果与患者满意度
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 29;19:309-316. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S504090. eCollection 2025.
2
Visual Outcomes and Quality of Vision After Bilateral Implantation of a Hydrophobic Acrylic Trifocal Intraocular Lens.双侧植入疏水丙烯酸三焦点人工晶状体后的视觉效果与视觉质量
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 21;19:227-234. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S506516. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison of visual function and patient-reported outcomes between two full range of field intraocular lenses: a randomized controlled study.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001678.
4
Comparison of clinical performance and subjective outcomes between two diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one monofocal IOL in bilateral cataract surgery.两种衍射性三焦点人工晶状体(IOL)与一种单焦点 IOL 在双侧白内障手术中的临床效果和主观结果比较。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2022 Jan 24;27(2):41. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2702041.
5
Clinical outcomes in eyes with diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lenses enhanced for near vision: comparison with trifocal intraocular lenses.具有增强近视力的衍射型连续景深人工晶状体的眼的临床结果:与三焦点人工晶状体的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03207-6.
6
Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后三焦点与扩展景深(EDOF)人工晶状体的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 10;7(7):CD014891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2.
7
Comparison of Mix-and-Match Implanted Bifocal IOLs and Bilateral Implanted Trifocal IOLs After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后混合植入双焦点人工晶状体与双侧植入三焦点人工晶状体的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):559-564. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190806-01.
8
Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses.与三焦点人工晶状体相比,扩展焦深人工晶状体的真实世界视觉效果和患者满意度评估。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;41(1):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
Comparative Study Between Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.非衍射型扩展焦深人工晶状体与单焦点人工晶状体的比较研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 14;17:1161-1168. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S402069. eCollection 2023.
10
Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens.新型三焦点人工晶状体的短期视觉效果
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 May 17;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0462-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes in eyes with diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lenses enhanced for near vision: comparison with trifocal intraocular lenses.具有增强近视力的衍射型连续景深人工晶状体的眼的临床结果:与三焦点人工晶状体的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03207-6.
2
Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence After Bilateral Implantation of the Synergy™ Intraocular Lens.双侧植入Synergy™人工晶状体后的视觉效果、视觉质量、患者满意度及摆脱眼镜依赖情况
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 9;17:2277-2285. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S421185. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical performance of a hybrid presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in patients undergoing cataract surgery in a multicenter trial.
多中心临床试验中白内障患者行白内障手术后的混合性老视矫正型人工晶状体的临床效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Aug 1;49(8):840-847. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001205.
4
Comparative Visual Outcome Analysis of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens and a New Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus.衍射多焦点人工晶状体与新型扩展焦深衍射多焦点晶状体的视觉效果对比分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 12;11(24):7374. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247374.
5
Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a new multifocal intraocular lens vs a trifocal intraocular lens.新多焦点人工晶状体与三焦点人工晶状体 3 个月视力结果比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Nov 1;48(11):1270-1276. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000971. Epub 2022 May 12.
6
Comparison of refractive and visual outcomes of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.三种矫正老视的眼内晶状体的屈光和视觉效果比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):280-287. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000743.
7
The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance.PanOptix三焦点人工晶状体与ReSTOR 2.5主动聚焦和ReSTOR 3.0附加多焦点晶状体的比较:患者满意度、视觉干扰和未矫正视觉性能的研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 4;15:983-990. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S285628. eCollection 2021.
8
Multifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Comparison of Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Trials.多焦点和扩展景深人工晶状体:美国食品和药物管理局上市前批准试验数据比较。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Feb 1;37(2):98-104. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201111-02.
9
Comparative analysis of objective and subjective outcomes of two different intraocular lenses: trifocal and extended range of vision.两种不同人工晶状体的客观和主观结果比较分析:三焦点和扩展视力范围人工晶状体
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 14;5(1):e000497. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000497. eCollection 2020.
10
Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens.对比单焦点人工晶状体,衍射型三焦点人工晶状体的视觉和患者报告结果。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Feb;128(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Sep 28.