Garcia Leandro E, Lin Zitong, Culos Sophie, Catherine Muenker M, Johnson Emily E, Wang Zheng, Lopez-Giraldez Francesc, Giraud-Gatineau Alexandre, Jackson Angela, Picardeau Mathieu, Goodlett David R, Townsend Jeffrey P, Pětrošová Helena, Wunder Elsio A
Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Department of Pathobiology and Veterinary Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 24:2025.01.22.634353. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.22.634353.
Pathogenic species can survive and thrive in a wide range of environments. Distinct environments expose the bacteria to different temperatures, osmolarities, and amounts and sources of nutrition. However, leptospires are mostly cultured, in a laboratory setting under conditions that do not reflect natural environments. This constraint on laboratory cultures limits the applicability of studies to the understanding of even simple pathogenic processes. Here we report, investigate, and identify a medium and conditions that mimic the host environment during leptospirosis infection, expanding the available tools to evaluate leptospiral pathogenesis. We quantified genome-wide gene expression of pathogenic cultured in different media compositions (EMJH, DMEM, EMEM, and HAN). Using EMJH as standard, we compared gene expression in these compositions to genome-wide gene expression gathered in a host environment: whole blood (WB) of hamsters after infection with pathogenic leptospires. Leptospires cultured in DMEM and EMEM media shared 40% and 47% of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of leptospires present within WB (FDR<0.01), while leptospires cultured in HAN media only shared 20% of DEGs with those from WB. Furthermore, gene and pathway expression of leptospires cultured on DMEM and EMEM media exhibited a better correlation with leptospires grown in WB, including promoting expression of a similar leptospiral lipid A profile to the one identified directly in host tissues. Taken together, these results indicate that commercial cell-culture media EMEM or DMEM are better surrogates for pathogenic studies than EMJH or HAN media in . These alternative culture conditions, using media that are a standard supply worldwide, provide a reproducible and cost-effective approach that can accelerate research investigation and reduce the number of animal infections necessary for basic research of leptospirosis.
致病物种能够在广泛的环境中生存和繁衍。不同的环境使细菌面临不同的温度、渗透压以及营养物质的数量和来源。然而,钩端螺旋体大多是在实验室环境中培养的,这些条件并不能反映自然环境。实验室培养的这种限制甚至限制了对简单致病过程理解的研究适用性。在此,我们报告、研究并确定了一种模拟钩端螺旋体病感染期间宿主环境的培养基和条件,扩展了评估钩端螺旋体发病机制的可用工具。我们对在不同培养基成分(EMJH、DMEM、EMEM和HAN)中培养的致病钩端螺旋体进行了全基因组基因表达定量。以EMJH为标准,我们将这些成分中的基因表达与在宿主环境中收集的全基因组基因表达进行了比较:感染致病性钩端螺旋体后仓鼠的全血(WB)。在DMEM和EMEM培养基中培养的钩端螺旋体分别与WB中存在的钩端螺旋体所有差异表达基因(DEG)的40%和47%相同(FDR<0.01),而在HAN培养基中培养的钩端螺旋体仅与WB中的DEG有20%相同。此外,在DMEM和EMEM培养基上培养的钩端螺旋体的基因和通路表达与在WB中生长的钩端螺旋体表现出更好的相关性,包括促进与直接在宿主组织中鉴定出的相似钩端螺旋体脂多糖谱的表达。综上所述,这些结果表明,对于致病性研究而言,商业细胞培养基EMEM或DMEM比EMJH或HAN培养基更适合替代物。这些使用全球标准供应培养基的替代培养条件提供了一种可重复且经济高效的方法,可加速研究调查并减少钩端螺旋体病基础研究所需的动物感染数量。