• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于友谊发展的纵向研究。

A longitudinal study of friendship development.

作者信息

Hays R B

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Apr;48(4):909-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.48.4.909.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.48.4.909
PMID:3989674
Abstract

At 3-week intervals during their first term at the university, 84 male and female freshman completed questionnaires regarding their relationships with two same-sex individuals whom they had just met. Results showed that dyads which successfully developed into close friendships by the end of the fall school term differed behaviorally and attitudinally from dyads that did not progress. As the friendships developed, the intimacy level of dyadic interaction accounted for an increasing percentage of the variance in ratings of friendship intensity beyond that accounted for by the sheer quantity of interaction. Ratings of relationship benefits were consistently positively correlated with friendship intensity and increased as the relationship progressed. There were no differences in ratings of relationship costs between close and nonclose friends. Dyadic behavior patterns and attitude ratings at the end of the fall school term were good predictors of friendship status 3 months later. Motivational and situational factors were also correlated with friendship outcomes.

摘要

在大学第一学期,每隔3周,84名男女新生就他们与刚结识的两名同性个体的关系填写问卷。结果显示,到秋季学期末成功发展为亲密友谊的二人组在行为和态度上与未取得进展的二人组有所不同。随着友谊的发展,二元互动的亲密程度在友谊强度评分的方差中所占比例越来越大,超过了单纯互动量所占的比例。关系益处的评分与友谊强度始终呈正相关,并随着关系的发展而增加。亲密朋友和非亲密朋友在关系成本评分上没有差异。秋季学期末的二元行为模式和态度评分是3个月后友谊状态的良好预测指标。动机和情境因素也与友谊结果相关。

相似文献

1
A longitudinal study of friendship development.一项关于友谊发展的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Apr;48(4):909-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.48.4.909.
2
Dyadic differences in friendships of adolescents with chronic pain compared with pain-free peers.青少年慢性疼痛患者与无疼痛同龄人友谊的对偶差异。
Pain. 2018 Jun;159(6):1103-1111. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001191.
3
Friendship after a friends with benefits relationship: deception, psychological functioning, and social connectedness.“友达以上,恋人未满”关系后的友谊:欺骗、心理功能与社会联结
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Nov;42(8):1443-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0160-7. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
4
Symptoms of ADHD and close friendships in adolescence.青少年注意缺陷多动障碍症状与亲密友谊。
J Atten Disord. 2012 Jul;16(5):406-17. doi: 10.1177/1087054710390865. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
5
Friendship quality in adolescents with and without an intellectual disability.青少年有无智力残疾者的友谊质量。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Nov;26(6):522-32. doi: 10.1111/jar.12051. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
6
The development and maintenance of friendship in high-functioning children with autism: maternal perceptions.高功能自闭症儿童友谊的发展与维持:母亲的看法
Autism. 2003 Mar;7(1):81-97. doi: 10.1177/1362361303007001007.
7
Attachment representations and characteristics of friendship relations during adolescence.青少年时期友谊关系的依恋表征及特征。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 May;88(1):83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.002.
8
Adolescents' interactions with a best friend: associations with attachment style.青少年与挚友的互动:与依恋风格的关联
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 May;88(1):102-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.003.
9
Relations among early adolescents' parent-adolescent attachment, perceived social competence, and friendship quality.青少年早期亲子依恋、感知到的社交能力和友谊质量之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):819-41. doi: 10.2466/02.07.09.21.PR0.109.6.819-841.
10
Friendships fighting prejudice: a longitudinal perspective on adolescents' cross-group friendships with immigrants.青少年与移民跨群体友谊:从纵向角度看友谊如何消除偏见。
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Jun;44(6):1318-31. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0256-6. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Intergroup Time Bias and Its Implications for Medical Healthcare.组间时间偏差及其对医疗保健的影响。
J Soc Issues. 2025 Sep;81(3). doi: 10.1111/josi.70014. Epub 2025 Aug 24.
2
Development and validation of the gift reciprocation anxiety scale (GRAS) for youths and adults in intimate relationships.亲密关系中青少年和成年人礼物互惠焦虑量表(GRAS)的编制与验证
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 14;11(2):e41956. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41956. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
3
The Social Processes of Excessive Online Gaming Homophily: Peer Selection or Influence?
过度网络游戏同好的社会过程:同伴选择还是影响?
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Oct;53(10):2393-2406. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02032-4. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
4
Trust levels in social networks.社交网络中的信任级别。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 15;9(9):e19850. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19850. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Differentiation in Emotional Investments in Work Groups among Different Social Status of Construction Industry Practitioners: A Perspective from the Social Exchange Theory.不同社会地位的建筑行业从业者在工作群体中的情感投入差异:基于社会交换理论的视角。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 14;2022:9306167. doi: 10.1155/2022/9306167. eCollection 2022.
6
Rethinking Social Relationships in Adulthood: The Differential Investment of Resources Model.重新思考成年期的社会关系:资源差异化投入模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Feb;26(1):57-82. doi: 10.1177/10888683211067035. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Gender and Friendship Norms Among Older Adults.老年人中的性别与友谊规范
Res Aging. 2009 May 1;31(3):318-344. doi: 10.1177/0164027508330719.
8
How the quality of peer relationships influences college alcohol use.同伴关系的质量如何影响大学生饮酒行为。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Jul;25(4):361-70. doi: 10.1080/09595230600741339.