Suppr超能文献

YouTube作为桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎患者信息来源的质量与可靠性分析

Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.

作者信息

Kim Jason H, Hoy John F, Shuman Samuel L, Ahmad Farhan, Simcock Xavier C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Wrist Surg. 2023 Nov 29;14(1):42-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777017. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

This study seeks to evaluate the quality and reliability of information regarding de Quervain's tenosynovitis on YouTube.  A search on the YouTube was performed using the keywords , and the first 50 videos were evaluated. Video characteristics including views, content type, and video upload source were recorded. Video reliability was assessed using the ( ) benchmark criteria. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a novel de Quervain's Tenosynovitis-Specific Score (DQT-SS).  The total number of views for all videos evaluated was 5,508,498 (mean, 110,169.96 ± 155,667.07). Video reliability and quality metrics were low, with a mean score of 2.17 ± 0.82 out of 4, a mean GQS of 2.49 ± 1.28 out of 5, and a mean DQT-SS of 4.53 ± 2.35 out of 11. Significant between-group effects were found for the video source and DQT-SS (  = 0.027), as well as between content type and score (  = 0.027), GQS (  = 0.003), and DQT-SS (  = 0.003). Positive independent predictors of DQT-SS included video duration in seconds (β = 0.391) and disease-specific information content type (β = 0.648).  Videos on YouTube regarding de Quervain's tenosynovitis were frequently viewed; however, the information present was of low quality and reliability. Physician-uploaded videos had the highest mean scores, GQS, and DQT-SS, but had the second-lowest mean number of views of video sources. Patients should receive proper in-office education and be directed toward reputable resources for their orthopaedic conditions.

摘要

本研究旨在评估YouTube上有关桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎信息的质量和可靠性。在YouTube上使用关键词进行搜索,并对前50个视频进行评估。记录视频特征,包括观看次数、内容类型和视频上传来源。使用( )基准标准评估视频可靠性。使用全球质量评分(GQS)和一种新的桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎特异性评分(DQT-SS)评估视频质量。所有评估视频的总观看次数为5,508,498次(平均,110,169.96±155,667.07)。视频可靠性和质量指标较低,4分制下平均 评分为2.17±0.82,5分制下平均GQS为2.49±1.28,11分制下平均DQT-SS为4.53±2.35。在视频来源与DQT-SS之间( =0.027),以及内容类型与 评分( =0.027)、GQS( =0.003)和DQT-SS( =0.003)之间发现了显著的组间效应。DQT-SS的正向独立预测因素包括视频时长(秒)(β=0.391)和疾病特异性信息内容类型(β=0.648)。YouTube上关于桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎的视频观看次数频繁;然而,所提供的信息质量和可靠性较低。医生上传的视频平均 评分、GQS和DQT-SS最高,但视频来源的平均观看次数在所有来源中排第二低。患者应接受适当的门诊教育,并被引导至可靠的资源以了解其骨科疾病情况。

相似文献

1
Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.
J Wrist Surg. 2023 Nov 29;14(1):42-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777017. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source for Patient Education on Dupuytren's Contracture.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Feb 21;6(3):313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube.
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Sep 6;11(4):295-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735231. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov 27;1(2):e109-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2019.09.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
8
Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on SLAP Tears.
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Dec;51(6):582-589. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2147805. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23984. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
YouTube Is a Poor-Quality Source for Patient Information Regarding Patellar Dislocations.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar 24;5(2):e459-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.014. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36299. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36299. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Analysis of Video Reliability, Quality, and Content.
Hand (N Y). 2024 Sep;19(6):986-994. doi: 10.1177/15589447231151428. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
4
The science of YouTube: What factors influence user engagement with online science videos?
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0267697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267697. eCollection 2022.
5
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z.
6
YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23984. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube.
Indian J Orthop. 2021 May 25;56(1):73-78. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00430-5. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
A Systematic Assessment of YouTube Content on Femoroacetabular Impingement: An Updated Review.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun 29;9(6):23259671211016340. doi: 10.1177/23259671211016340. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Editorial Commentary: YouTube Videos Provide Poor-Quality Medical Information: Don't Believe What You Watch!
Arthroscopy. 2020 Dec;36(12):3048-3049. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.042.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验