Marselina Mariana, Rahmi Nurul Aulia, Nurhayati Siti Ai
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia.
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 8;11(2):e41690. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41690. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
Water is a crucial natural resource, integral to sustaining human life and environmental equilibrium. However, water quality remains a critical issue issue due to prevailing contamination. While river water is a primary source of raw drinking water, much of it, such as Indonesia's Citarum River in West Java, has been polluted. While studies in Indonesia using the Water Quality Index (WQI) are limited, various measurement methods have been developed globally to evaluate water quality. This research compares three methods - the Overall Index of Pollution (OIP), Said-WQI method, and Pollution Index (PI) - to assess the water quality of Upstream Citarum River. The research utilized both primary and secondary data derived from Citarum River samples. Additionally, analytical tools including Microsoft Excel, Geographic Information System (GIS), and SPSS, were used for data processing, rainfall analysis, and statistical testing, respectively. Results from four river-monitoring points indicated average values for key parameters such as biochemical oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen (DO), and total and fecal coliform, falling below established quality standards. WQI measurements revealed variable degrees of pollution in the Upstream Citarum River according to the method used. The OIP and Said-WQI methods categorized the river's status as ranging from 'good' to 'poor', while the PI method classified it from 'mildly polluted' to 'severely polluted'. Seasonal analysis of wet and dry months using secondary data revealed OIP index values ranging from 3.71 to 11.20, classifying water quality as "poor" to "moderate". The Said-WQI method yielded values between 0.67 and 2.34, indicating "poor" to "good" quality, while the PI method produced values from 4.15 to 8.13, denoting "moderately polluted" to "heavily polluted" conditions. Spatial analysis showed that upstream conditions were better than downstream conditions. The OIP index ranged from 3.71 upstream to 11.20 downstream with a classification of "poor" to "good". The Said-WQI index ranged from 0.67 upstream to 2.34 downstream, classified as - "poor" to "good". Similarly, the PI index ranged from 4.15 upstream to 8.13 downstream, indicating "moderately polluted" to "severely polluted" conditions. These findings from secondary data were corroborated by primary field sampling results. This study successfully evaluated the water quality of the Upper Citarum River by comparing measurement data with established standards across various locations and time periods. Furthermore, it conducted a comparative analysis of the differences between the three indices, focusing on parameters, sub-index transformations, weighting, and aggregation processes.
水是一种至关重要的自然资源,对维持人类生命和环境平衡不可或缺。然而,由于普遍存在的污染问题,水质仍然是一个关键问题。虽然河水是原饮用水的主要来源,但其中许多河流,如西爪哇的印度尼西亚芝塔龙河,已受到污染。虽然印度尼西亚使用水质指数(WQI)的研究有限,但全球已开发出各种测量方法来评估水质。本研究比较了三种方法——总体污染指数(OIP)、赛义德-WQI法和污染指数(PI)——以评估芝塔龙河上游的水质。该研究利用了从芝塔龙河样本中获取的一手和二手数据。此外,还分别使用了包括微软Excel、地理信息系统(GIS)和SPSS在内的分析工具进行数据处理、降雨分析和统计测试。四个河流监测点的结果表明,生化需氧量、溶解氧(DO)以及总大肠菌群和粪大肠菌群等关键参数的平均值低于既定的质量标准。根据所使用的方法,WQI测量结果显示芝塔龙河上游存在不同程度的污染。OIP和赛义德-WQI法将河流状况分类为从“良好”到“较差”,而PI法则将其分类为从“轻度污染”到“重度污染”。利用二手数据对干湿月份进行的季节性分析显示,OIP指数值在3.71至11.20之间,水质分类为“较差”到“中等”。赛义德-WQI法得出的值在0.67至2.34之间,表明水质为“较差”到“良好”,而PI法得出的值为4.15至8.13,表示“中度污染”到“重度污染”状况。空间分析表明,上游状况优于下游状况。OIP指数从上游的3.71到下游的11.20,分类为“较差”到“良好”。赛义德-WQI指数从上游的0.67到下游的2.34,分类为——“较差”到“良好”。同样,PI指数从上游的4.15到下游的8.13,表明“中度污染”到“重度污染”状况。这些二手数据的结果得到了实地采样一手结果的证实。本研究通过将测量数据与不同地点和时间段的既定标准进行比较成功评估了芝塔龙河上游的水质。此外,它还对三个指数之间的差异进行了比较分析,重点关注参数、子指数转换、加权和汇总过程。