Novak Dario, Čule Marko, Kim Jinseo, Kim Rockli, Subramanian S V
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Jan 11;11(1):e002024. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002024. eCollection 2025.
To explore the effects of two different types of exercise (individual vs group) on physical activity (PA) among Croatian university students.
A total of 976 university students between the ages of 19 and 20 years (age 19.4±1.1 years, body mass index 21.9±2.9 kg/m) were randomly assigned to either the control group (individual exercise) (n=504) or the intervention group, which received group exercise (n=472). Pre- and postintervention measures included: self-rated health, parents' occupation, psychological distress, nutritional status and PA levels. The overall intervention effect was estimated using linear regression method, and heterogeneity in intervention effect was assessed by modelling complex variance.
Group-based exercise intervention significantly increased total PA time by more than 10 metabolic equivalents (METS) hours per week compared with individual-based exercise control group. When considering different types of activities, the intervention effect was stronger for vigorous activity (increase by almost 6 METS hours per week) than walking activity (2.5 METS hours per week). The change in moderate activity level was not significant after covariate adjustment. In addition, intervention was also effective in reducing sedentary hours. Finally, when complex level-1 heterogeneity was modelled by intervention status, we found substantially larger variance in the intervention group compared with the controls, indicating presence of heterogeneous treatment effect.
This study discusses major implications of different ways of exercising among youths from a health, educational and sport perspective. Intervention and policies that leverage school social capital might serve as an avenue for health promotion in youth.
探讨两种不同类型的运动(个体运动与团体运动)对克罗地亚大学生身体活动(PA)的影响。
共有976名年龄在19至20岁之间的大学生(年龄19.4±1.1岁,体重指数21.9±2.9kg/m)被随机分配到对照组(个体运动)(n = 504)或接受团体运动的干预组(n = 472)。干预前后的测量指标包括:自我健康评价、父母职业、心理困扰、营养状况和身体活动水平。使用线性回归方法估计总体干预效果,并通过对复杂方差建模评估干预效果的异质性。
与个体运动对照组相比,基于团体的运动干预显著增加了每周总的身体活动时间,增加量超过10代谢当量(METS)小时。在考虑不同类型的活动时,对剧烈活动的干预效果(每周增加近6METS小时)比对步行活动的效果更强(每周增加2.5METS小时)。协变量调整后,中等活动水平的变化不显著。此外,干预在减少久坐时间方面也有效。最后,当按干预状态对复杂的一级异质性进行建模时,我们发现干预组的方差比对照组大得多,表明存在异质性治疗效果。
本研究从健康、教育和体育的角度讨论了青少年不同运动方式的主要影响。利用学校社会资本的干预措施和政策可能是促进青少年健康的一条途径。