• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被遗忘的声音:让智障儿童和青少年表达他们对住院经历的看法

The Forgotten Voices: Enabling Children and Young People With Intellectual Disability to Express Their Views on Their Inpatient Hospital Experience.

作者信息

Wray Jo, Russell Jessica, Gibson Faith, Kenten Charlotte, Oulton Kate

机构信息

Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70168. doi: 10.1111/hex.70168.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70168
PMID:39902498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11791408/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of enabling patients to provide feedback on their experience of healthcare is widely accepted but there are few appropriate measures to enable children and young people to directly provide feedback, particularly those with intellectual disability or younger children. Our primary aim was to develop and test patient-reported experience measures for children and young people with intellectual disability who use inpatient hospital services. A secondary aim was to test these measures with younger children aged 4-7 years without intellectual disability.

METHODS

A hospital inpatient patient-reported experience measure previously developed for children aged 8-11 years was revised iteratively in conjunction with a parent advisory group (comprising five parents of children and young people with and without intellectual disability) and children and young people with intellectual disability. The final patient-reported experience measure was tested in children's inpatient wards at seven hospitals in England over a 3-month period.

RESULTS

Parents suggested a need for a single patient-reported experience measure for all children with intellectual disability which contained simpler language, fewer questions and response options, and images to illustrate each question. The final patient-reported experience measure had 22 questions, each with a corresponding image, and a free text box in which children could add anything further. Questions addressed environment, people, care and treatment and safety. During testing at seven children's hospitals, 52 children and young people with intellectual disability (4-18 years) and 76 children without intellectual disability (4-7 years), all of whom received inpatient care, completed the patient-reported experience measure. Two percent of data were missing; in 16 instances respondents either ticked two responses or placed a tick between two response categories. Half the respondents added comments and/or drew a picture.

CONCLUSION

The development of a patient-reported experience measure for children and young people with intellectual disability provides a previously unavailable opportunity for them to report on their experiences of inpatient care and have their voices heard. Future work to extend testing to a wider group is underway and will enable us to clarify whether one patient-reported experience measure is valid and reliable for all children and young people with intellectual disability.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A parent advisory group, comprising parents/carers of young people with or without a learning disability, advised on all aspects of the wider study design and specifically on revisions to the measure reported in this manuscript. The parent advisory group met twice a year during the study with email contact between meetings for specific requests and study updates. Representatives of the advisory group also attended the study steering group.

摘要

背景

让患者对其医疗体验提供反馈的重要性已得到广泛认可,但几乎没有合适的措施能让儿童和青少年直接提供反馈,尤其是那些有智力残疾的儿童或年幼的儿童。我们的主要目标是为使用住院医院服务的智力残疾儿童和青少年开发并测试患者报告体验测量工具。次要目标是对4至7岁无智力残疾的年幼儿童测试这些测量工具。

方法

与一个家长咨询小组(由五名有或无智力残疾儿童和青少年的家长组成)以及智力残疾儿童和青少年一起,对先前为8至11岁儿童开发的医院住院患者报告体验测量工具进行了反复修订。最终的患者报告体验测量工具在英格兰七家医院的儿童住院病房进行了为期3个月的测试。

结果

家长们建议为所有智力残疾儿童制定一个单一的患者报告体验测量工具,该工具应使用更简单的语言、更少的问题和回答选项,并配有图片来说明每个问题。最终的患者报告体验测量工具有22个问题,每个问题都配有相应的图片,还有一个自由文本框,儿童可以在其中添加任何其他内容。问题涉及环境、人员、护理与治疗以及安全。在七家儿童医院进行测试期间,52名智力残疾儿童和青少年(4至18岁)以及76名无智力残疾儿童(4至7岁),他们均接受了住院治疗,完成了患者报告体验测量工具。2%的数据缺失;在16个案例中,受访者要么勾选了两个回答,要么在两个回答类别之间打了勾。一半的受访者添加了评论和/或画了一幅画。

结论

为智力残疾儿童和青少年开发患者报告体验测量工具为他们提供了一个前所未有的机会来报告其住院护理体验并让他们被倾听。将测试扩展到更广泛群体的未来工作正在进行,这将使我们能够阐明一个患者报告体验测量工具对所有智力残疾儿童和青少年是否有效且可靠。

患者或公众贡献

一个家长咨询小组,由有或无学习障碍青少年的家长/照顾者组成,就更广泛研究设计的所有方面提供建议,特别是对本手稿中报告的测量工具的修订。在研究期间,家长咨询小组每年开会两次,会议期间通过电子邮件联系以处理特定请求和研究更新。咨询小组的代表也参加了研究指导小组。

相似文献

1
The Forgotten Voices: Enabling Children and Young People With Intellectual Disability to Express Their Views on Their Inpatient Hospital Experience.被遗忘的声音:让智障儿童和青少年表达他们对住院经历的看法
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70168. doi: 10.1111/hex.70168.
2
What do parents think about the quality and safety of care provided by hospitals to children and young people with an intellectual disability? A qualitative study using thematic analysis.家长如何看待为智障儿童和青少年提供的医院护理的质量和安全性?一项使用主题分析的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13925. doi: 10.1111/hex.13925. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Specific phobias in children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities: SPIRIT, an adaptation and feasibility study.特定恐惧症在中重度智力残疾儿童中的表现:SPIRIT,一项改编和可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(64):1-118. doi: 10.3310/LRWD7852.
4
Hearing the voices of children and young people to develop and test a patient-reported experience measure in a specialist paediatric setting.在专科儿科环境中倾听儿童和青少年的声音,开发和测试患者报告的体验衡量工具。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Mar;103(3):272-279. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313032. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an adapted intervention for preschoolers with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities displaying behaviours that challenge: the EPICC-ID RCT.针对有中度至重度智力残疾且表现出挑战性行为的学龄前儿童的适应性干预的临床和成本效益:EPICC-ID RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(6):1-94. doi: 10.3310/JKTY6144.
7
'Smiles and laughter and all those really great things': Nurses' perceptions of good experiences of care for inpatient children and young people with intellectual disability.“微笑、欢笑和所有那些美好的事情”:护士对住院智障儿童和青少年的美好护理体验的看法。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Sep;78(9):2933-2948. doi: 10.1111/jan.15256. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
A randomised controlled multicentre trial of treatments for adolescent anorexia nervosa including assessment of cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability - the TOuCAN trial.一项针对青少年神经性厌食症治疗方法的随机对照多中心试验,包括成本效益评估和患者可接受性评估——TOuCAN 试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar;14(15):1-98. doi: 10.3310/hta14150.
9
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
10
What do healthcare staff think about the quality and safety of care provided to children and young people with an intellectual disability? A qualitative study using the framework method of analysis.医护人员如何看待为智障儿童和青少年提供的医疗质量和安全性?一项采用框架分析法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 25;13(7):e071494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071494.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating a codesigned paediatric patient reported experience measure: a study protocol.验证一个经代码签名的儿科患者报告体验测量工具:一项研究方案
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jul 30;9(1):e003490. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003490.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Healthcare Experiences Among People With Intellectual Disability: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis of Tools and Methods.衡量智障人士的医疗保健体验:工具和方法的快速证据综合。
Value Health. 2024 Nov;27(11):1605-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.018. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
2
Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Children and Young People for the Canadian Context.适应、翻译和验证适合加拿大国情的儿童和青少年患者报告体验测量工具。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 May;59(5):810-817. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of a patient-reported experience measure for children.
儿童患者报告体验测量工具的翻译、文化调适和验证。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13924. doi: 10.1111/hex.13924. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Use of Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Care: A Systematic Review.患者报告体验测量在儿科护理中的应用:一项系统评价。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 20;9:753536. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.753536. eCollection 2021.
5
Codesigning patient experience measures for and with children and young people with intellectual disability: a study protocol.为有智力障碍的儿童和青少年共同设计患者体验测量指标:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e050973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050973.
6
Using parent-reported experience measures as quality improvement tools in paediatric cardiothoracic services: making it happen.利用家长报告的体验指标作为儿科心胸服务的质量改进工具:付诸实践。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Apr 27;32(2):140-148. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa001.
7
An observational study of the use of acute hospital care by people with intellectual disabilities in England.一项关于英格兰智障人群使用急性医院护理的观察性研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Feb;63(2):85-99. doi: 10.1111/jir.12544. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
8
Children and young people's versus parents' responses in an English national inpatient survey.儿童和青少年与父母在英国全国住院调查中的反应。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 May;103(5):486-491. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313801. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Hearing the voices of children and young people to develop and test a patient-reported experience measure in a specialist paediatric setting.在专科儿科环境中倾听儿童和青少年的声音,开发和测试患者报告的体验衡量工具。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Mar;103(3):272-279. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313032. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
New patient-reported experience measure for children with allergic disease: development, validation and results from integrated care.针对过敏性疾病儿童的新患者报告体验指标:综合护理的开发、验证及结果
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Oct;101(10):935-43. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309598. Epub 2016 Aug 2.