Khanna Priya, Roberts Chris, Lane Andrew Stuart
Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02442-5.
Medical students navigate complex personal learning pathways from entry into medical school, through an educational program, and into life-long practice. However, many stakeholders have called for substantive reforms in contemporary curricula, citing concerns about the lack of key abilities amongst newly graduated doctors to work in complex healthcare environments. Despite the need for educators to focus on curricula design, there is a paucity of overarching perspectives that allow synthesis of the various curricular elements in a way that lends meaningfulness and appreciation to the students in terms of navigating the immediate program requirements and beyond. Without such guidance, educators risk creating fragmented program designs that can lead to both unintended and unactionable outcomes for students as well as curriculum designers. Using systems thinking, we set out to address this gap by providing an overarching perspective for curriculum designers to appreciate the relationships and the interactions of the various curricular elements that inform and impact student's preparedness for practice.
By framing a curriculum as a complex adaptive system, we used soft systems thinking to develop an initial prototype of a conceptual curricular toolkit, underpinned by an appraisal of relevant literature within health professional education and the broader educational context. The prototype was further refined iteratively after critical reflection by the authors with a diverse range of national and international colleagues via posters, short communications, and workshops at several conferences, and through social media.
We describe how the 3P-6Cs toolkit captures a learner's personal journey through an educational program into a field of practice by logically linking the three key elements: the personal, the program, and the practice. We demonstrate its application in three examples related to contemporary health profession education curricula. These are: creating integrated educational designs to capture students' developmental continua, conceptualising immersive clinical placements in non-traditional settings, and complexity-consistent evaluation of curricular interventions.
Applying the 3P-6Cs curricular toolkit to problems of curricula (re)design can provide overarching perspectives that enable educators to have a better understanding of how integration of elements within education programs can inform and impact student's preparation for lifelong practice.
医学生从进入医学院开始,经过一个教育项目,再进入终身实践,要经历复杂的个人学习路径。然而,许多利益相关者呼吁对当代课程进行实质性改革,理由是担心新毕业的医生缺乏在复杂医疗环境中工作的关键能力。尽管教育工作者需要关注课程设计,但缺乏总体性的观点,无法将各种课程元素综合起来,使学生在应对当前课程要求及其他方面时能理解其意义并产生认同感。没有这样的指导,教育工作者可能会设计出碎片化的课程,这可能会给学生以及课程设计者带来意想不到且无法实施的结果。我们运用系统思维,旨在通过为课程设计者提供一个总体性的视角来填补这一空白,以便他们理解各种课程元素之间的关系和相互作用,这些元素会影响并反映学生的实践准备情况。
通过将课程框架视为一个复杂适应系统,我们运用软系统思维开发了一个概念性课程工具包的初始原型,其依据是对健康职业教育及更广泛教育背景下的相关文献的评估。在作者与来自不同国家和国际的同事通过海报、简短交流以及在多个会议上举办的研讨会,还有社交媒体进行批判性反思后,该原型得到了进一步的迭代完善。
我们描述了3P - 6C工具包如何通过逻辑地连接个人、课程和实践这三个关键要素,来捕捉学习者从教育项目到实践领域的个人历程。我们展示了它在与当代健康职业教育课程相关的三个例子中的应用。这些例子包括:创建综合教育设计以捕捉学生的发展连续性,将非传统环境中的沉浸式临床实习概念化,以及对课程干预进行复杂性一致的评估。
将3P - 6C课程工具包应用于课程(重新)设计问题,可以提供总体性的视角,使教育工作者能够更好地理解教育项目中各元素的整合如何影响并反映学生为终身实践所做的准备。