• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会判断的个性化模型与情境依赖表征

Individualized models of social judgments and context-dependent representations.

作者信息

Albohn Daniel N, Uddenberg Stefan, Todorov Alexander

机构信息

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86056-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-86056-1
PMID:39905020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11794686/
Abstract

How individuals view the world is critical to understanding human behavior. Yet, almost all research within perception and judgment has drawn inferences from group-level behavior, with little work focused on understanding how the individual perceives their world. However, for complex judgments (e.g., trustworthiness), most of the meaningful variance is due to factors specific to the individual. Here we showcase a data-driven reverse correlation method for visualizing any perceptually-derived stereotype at the individual level. We show that our method (1) produces photorealistic and reliable results related to a broad range of judgments, (2) produces valid, psychologically-aligned representations of what individuals are imagining "in their mind's eye", and (3) is capable of capturing visual representations sensitive enough to examine context-dependent categories (e.g., a trustworthy individual to babysit your children vs. to fix your car). Across all studies, we highlight the theoretical implications and utility of developing idiosyncratic models of visual perception.

摘要

个体如何看待世界对于理解人类行为至关重要。然而,几乎所有关于感知和判断的研究都是从群体层面的行为中得出推论,很少有工作专注于理解个体如何感知他们的世界。然而,对于复杂的判断(例如可信度),大部分有意义的差异是由个体特有的因素造成的。在这里,我们展示了一种数据驱动的反向相关方法,用于在个体层面可视化任何从感知中衍生出的刻板印象。我们表明,我们的方法(1)产生与广泛判断相关的逼真且可靠的结果,(2)产生个体在“脑海中想象”的有效、心理上一致的表征,并且(3)能够捕捉足够敏感的视觉表征以检查依赖于上下文的类别(例如,一个值得信赖的人来照顾你的孩子与修理你的汽车)。在所有研究中,我们强调了开发个性化视觉感知模型的理论意义和实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/b08c23a92e93/41598_2025_86056_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/3e757f36b0d8/41598_2025_86056_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/446402ba33f8/41598_2025_86056_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/042dcdd1fc1d/41598_2025_86056_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/f93d50d2407e/41598_2025_86056_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/7d0c0764eafe/41598_2025_86056_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/b08c23a92e93/41598_2025_86056_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/3e757f36b0d8/41598_2025_86056_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/446402ba33f8/41598_2025_86056_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/042dcdd1fc1d/41598_2025_86056_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/f93d50d2407e/41598_2025_86056_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/7d0c0764eafe/41598_2025_86056_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a382/11794686/b08c23a92e93/41598_2025_86056_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individualized models of social judgments and context-dependent representations.社会判断的个性化模型与情境依赖表征
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86056-1.
2
Social class perception is driven by stereotype-related facial features.社会阶层感知是由与刻板印象相关的面部特征驱动的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Mar;153(3):742-753. doi: 10.1037/xge0001519. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
The development of stereotype content: The use of warmth and competence in assessing social groups.刻板印象内容的发展:在评估社会群体时对热情和能力的运用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
4
Trustworthiness judgments without the halo effect: A data-driven computational modeling approach.无晕轮效应的可信度判断:一种数据驱动的计算建模方法。
Perception. 2023 Aug;52(8):590-607. doi: 10.1177/03010066231178489. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Reducing Facial Stereotype Bias in Consequential Social Judgments: Intervention Success With White Male Faces.减少后果性社会判断中的面部刻板印象偏见:白人男性面孔的干预成功。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;35(1):21-33. doi: 10.1177/09567976231215238. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
The effect of comparative context upon stereotype content: children's judgments of ingroup behavior.比较背景对刻板印象内容的影响:儿童对群体内行为的判断
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Apr;49(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00628.x.
7
Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: the role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments.刻板印象形成中的认知过程:正确的偶然性学习对有偏差的群体判断的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):599-614. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.599.
8
A data-driven, hyper-realistic method for visualizing individual mental representations of faces.一种用于可视化个体面部心理表征的数据驱动的超现实方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:997498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997498. eCollection 2022.
9
Deep models of superficial face judgments.浅层面部判断的深度模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 26;119(17):e2115228119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115228119. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
10
The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness.面部宽高比与攻击性判断之间的联系比与可信度判断之间的联系更强。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1526-41. doi: 10.1037/a0036732. Epub 2014 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.面部评估:研究结果、方法与挑战。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Mar;1545(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15293. Epub 2025 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of shared and idiosyncratic contributions to judgments of faces.面部判断中共同和独特贡献的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Nov;50(11):1117-1130. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001239. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Idiosyncratic and shared contributions shape impressions from voices and faces.个体特质和共同特征塑造了对声音和面孔的印象。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105881. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105881. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Evaluating CloudResearch's Approved Group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk.
评估 CloudResearch 的已批准小组作为解决 MTurk 上数据质量问题的方案。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):3953-3964. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01999-x. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
A data-driven, hyper-realistic method for visualizing individual mental representations of faces.一种用于可视化个体面部心理表征的数据驱动的超现实方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:997498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997498. eCollection 2022.
5
Deep models of superficial face judgments.浅层面部判断的深度模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 26;119(17):e2115228119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115228119. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Trait evaluations of faces and voices: Comparing within- and between-person variability.面孔和声音特质评估:比较个体内和个体间的可变性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Sep;150(9):1854-1869. doi: 10.1037/xge0001019. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Do I trust you when you smile? Effects of sex and emotional expression on facial trustworthiness appraisal.当你微笑时,我是否信任你?性别和情感表达对面部可信度评价的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243230. eCollection 2020.
8
The Mirror of Mind: Visualizing Mental Representations of Self Through Reverse Correlation.心灵之镜:通过反向关联可视化自我的心理表征
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1149. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01149. eCollection 2020.
9
Warm, lively, rough? Assessing agreement on aesthetic effects of artworks.温暖、生动、粗糙?评估艺术品的审美效果的一致性。
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232083. eCollection 2020.
10
Everyday Beliefs About Emotion Perceptually Derived From Neutral Facial Appearance.关于情绪的日常信念是从中性面部外观中感知获得的。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 28;11:264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00264. eCollection 2020.