Suppr超能文献

晚期转移性结直肠癌的再激发治疗与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)对比:一项回顾性研究

Rechallenge therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Liu Chenming, Chen Jintao, Liu Yuxing

机构信息

Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Fujian Changle District Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86575-x.

Abstract

Currently, the standard third-line treatment options for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include regorafenib, fruquintinib, and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), but these drugs have limited clinical efficacy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and survival outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) versus chemotherapy rechallenge in third-line treatment for advanced mCRC patients. From January 2019 to December 2022, 107 patients met the inclusion criteria. After 1:1 matching, there were 34 patients in both the TKI and rechallenge groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors. The result indicated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.17; P < 0.001) and chemotherapy rechallenge (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23-0.79; P = 0.007) were independent protective factors for overall survival (OS). Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score of 0-3 (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23-0.80; P = 0.008), progression-free survival (PFS) of frontline treatment (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43-1.00, P = 0.047) and chemotherapy rechallenge (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73; P = 0.002) were independent protective factors for PFS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the median OS in the rechallenge group was 13.2 months (95% CI: 9.6-19.3), compared with 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.5-14.5) in the TKI group, with a statistically significant difference (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.86; P = 0.013). The median PFS for the rechallenge group was 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.7), compared with 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.8) in the TKI group, with a statistically significant difference too (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32-0.91; P = 0.019). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that in Group A, the rechallenge group also had superior median OS and PFS compared with the TKI group. In conclusion, while TKIs are the current standard for third-line treatment in mCRC patients, chemotherapy rechallenge is a more effective option for patients who have achieved disease control in the first two lines of treatment.

摘要

目前,晚期转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的标准三线治疗方案包括瑞戈非尼、呋喹替尼和曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶(TAS-102),但这些药物的临床疗效有限。本研究旨在评估酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)与化疗再挑战在晚期mCRC患者三线治疗中的疗效和生存结局。2019年1月至2022年12月,107例患者符合纳入标准。经过1:1匹配后,TKI组和再挑战组各有34例患者。进行Cox回归分析以确定独立预测因素。结果表明,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分为0-1(风险比[HR]=0.03,95%置信区间[CI]:0.01-0.17;P<0.001)和化疗再挑战(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.23-0.79;P=0.007)是总生存期(OS)的独立保护因素。患者自评主观全面评定法(PG-SGA)评分为0-3(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.23-0.80;P=0.008)、一线治疗的无进展生存期(PFS)(HR=0.66,95%CI:0.43-1.00,P=0.047)和化疗再挑战(HR=0.42,95%CI:0.24-0.73;P=0.002)是PFS的独立保护因素。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,再挑战组的中位OS为13.2个月(95%CI:9.6-19.3),而TKI组为7.7个月(95%CI:6.5-14.5),差异有统计学意义(HR=0.47,95%CI:0.26-0.86;P=0.013)。再挑战组的中位PFS为5.0个月(95%CI:4.3-6.7),而TKI组为3.4个月(95%CI:2.7-4.8),差异也有统计学意义(HR=0.54,95%CI:0.32-0.91;P=0.019)。此外,亚组分析显示,在A组中,再挑战组的中位OS和PFS也优于TKI组。总之,虽然TKI是目前mCRC患者三线治疗的标准,但对于在前两线治疗中实现疾病控制的患者,化疗再挑战是更有效的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2707/11794864/c612eba7d108/41598_2025_86575_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验