• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

象征手法本身并不能提高对元素周期表上元素的记忆。

Symbolism itself does not improve memory for elements on the periodic table.

作者信息

Roberts Brady R T, Tran Sophia H N, Fernandes Myra A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87612-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-87612-5
PMID:39905049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11794865/
Abstract

Recent work demonstrates that symbols (e.g., $) are reliably better remembered than their word counterparts (e.g., 'dollar'). It remains an open question whether the memory benefit observed for symbols is due to their unique visual form, or because they offer a symbolic representation of to-be-remembered information. Here, we assessed memory for symbols on the periodic table of elements, which could be presented in symbol format (e.g., H) or word format (e.g., Hydrogen), and compared both to memory for meaningless letters (e.g., J). These stimuli were selected because they all share the same visual features and the former two share the same meaning. Memory was compared across individuals with and without a background in chemistry. In non-experts, memory was highest for words relative to symbols and meaningless letters. In experts (students who had passed an introductory chemistry course), however, memory for words and symbols was equivalent, with both higher than for meaningless letters. Results suggest that prior knowledge of what a symbol means is necessary to gain a memory benefit over semantically-void information, but is not enough to boost memory relative to words. We suggest that using a concrete visual symbol to represent an abstract concept is not enough to confer a memory advantage relative to words; a meaningful and visually distinctive symbol may be necessary.

摘要

近期研究表明,符号(如$)相比其对应的文字(如“美元”),在记忆方面表现得更为可靠。目前尚不清楚,观察到的符号记忆优势是源于其独特的视觉形式,还是因为它们为待记忆信息提供了一种符号化的表征。在此,我们评估了元素周期表中符号的记忆情况,这些符号可以以符号形式呈现(如H)或文字形式呈现(如氢),并将二者与无意义字母(如J)的记忆情况进行比较。选择这些刺激材料是因为它们都具有相同的视觉特征,且前两者具有相同的含义。我们比较了有化学背景和无化学背景的个体的记忆情况。在非专业人士中,对文字的记忆高于对符号和无意义字母的记忆。然而,在专业人士(通过基础化学课程的学生)中,对文字和符号的记忆相当,且两者都高于对无意义字母的记忆。结果表明,要获得相对于语义空洞信息的记忆优势,对符号含义的先验知识是必要的,但相对于文字而言,这并不足以提高记忆。我们认为,使用具体的视觉符号来表示抽象概念,相对于文字而言,并不足以赋予记忆优势;可能需要一个有意义且视觉上独特的符号。

相似文献

1
Symbolism itself does not improve memory for elements on the periodic table.象征手法本身并不能提高对元素周期表上元素的记忆。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87612-5.
2
Symbol superiority: Why $ is better remembered than 'dollar'.符号优势:为什么“$”比“dollar”更容易被记住。
Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105435. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
SymCog: An open-source toolkit for assessing human symbolic cognition.SymCog:一个用于评估人类符号认知能力的开源工具包。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):807-823. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01853-0. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Linking somatic and symbolic representation in semantic memory: the dynamic multilevel reactivation framework.语义记忆中躯体与符号表征的关联:动态多层次再激活框架
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1002-14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0824-5.
5
Representation of visual symbols in the visual word processing network.视觉词处理网络中视觉符号的表征。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Mar;69:232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.045. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
6
Functional specificity of the visual word form area: general activation for words and symbols but specific network activation for words.视觉词形区的功能特异性:对单词和符号的一般激活,但对单词的特定网络激活。
Brain Lang. 2008 Feb;104(2):180-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 May 24.
7
Mental construction of object symbols from meaningless elements by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)通过无意义元素构建物体符号的心理过程。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3566. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07563-z.
8
Reaction times to words vs symbols for both hands.
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Dec;99(3 Pt 1):754-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.3.754-756.
9
Safety symbol comprehension: effects of symbol type, familiarity, and age.安全标志理解:标志类型、熟悉程度和年龄的影响。
Hum Factors. 2004 Summer;46(2):183-95. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.2.183.37344.
10
Continuous visual properties of number influence the formation of novel symbolic representations.数字的连续视觉属性影响新符号表征的形成。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(9):1860-70. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.994538. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinctiveness, not dual coding, explains the picture-superiority effect.独特性而非双重编码解释了图片优势效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Mar 13:17470218241235520. doi: 10.1177/17470218241235520.
2
Symbol superiority: Why $ is better remembered than 'dollar'.符号优势:为什么“$”比“dollar”更容易被记住。
Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105435. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Listening to the Picture-Superiority Effect.聆听图片优势效应
Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;66(2):134-153. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000437. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account.增加单词独特性可消除识别中的图片优势效应:来自物理独特性解释的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):182-193. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0858-9.
5
Using pictures and words to understand recognition memory deterioration in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a review.运用图片和文字理解遗忘型轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的识别记忆衰退:综述。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Dec;12(6):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0310-7.
6
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
7
The worth of pictures: using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory.图片的价值:利用高密度事件相关电位来理解图片的记忆能力及识别记忆的动态过程。
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):378-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.023. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
8
The picture superiority effect in conceptual implicit memory: a conceptual distinctiveness hypothesis.概念性内隐记忆中的图片优势效应:一种概念独特性假说。
Am J Psychol. 2006 Spring;119(1):1-20.