Suppr超能文献

用于提高临床全血样本中引起败血症病原体分子诊断准确性的细菌DNA提取方法的比较评估。

Comparison evaluation of bacterial DNA extraction methods for improved molecular diagnostic accuracy of sepsis-causing pathogens in clinical whole blood samples.

作者信息

Na Byungjoon, Park Junghun, Park Sojin, Park Eunseon, Jang Jimin, Kim Yu-Hee, Lee Jinyeop, Chung Hae-Sun

机构信息

KingoBio, Inc. Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.

Ewha Education & Research Center for Infection, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87225-y.

Abstract

Sepsis, a leading cause of mortality, requires rapid and accurate pathogen identification to ensure effective treatment. Current diagnostic methods such as blood cultures are time-consuming, whereas molecular diagnostic techniques represent a promising alternative for faster pathogen detection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate different DNA extraction methods for the improved detection of infectious pathogens in the bloodstream. Specifically, we compared one column-based DNA extraction method (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit) with two magnetic bead-based DNA extraction methods (K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system). Real-time PCR was performed using specific primers to assess the efficiency of each method. The K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system exhibited higher accuracy rates of 77.5% (22/40) and 76.5% (21/40), respectively, compared to the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, which had an accuracy rate 65.0% (12/40) for Escherichia coli detection, whereas the GraBon™ system demonstrated higher accuracy rate of 77.5% (22/40) than the other two methods, which had an accuracy rates of 67.5% (14/40) for Staphylococcus aureus detection. All methods displayed high specificity for negative samples (100%). These findings highlight the superior performance of magnetic bead-based methods, particularly when automated, for extracting bacterial DNA from whole blood samples. Such methods may enable the more rapid and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections, potentially improving patient outcomes.

摘要

脓毒症是主要的死亡原因之一,需要快速准确地鉴定病原体以确保有效治疗。当前的诊断方法如血培养耗时较长,而分子诊断技术是更快检测病原体的一种有前景的替代方法。因此,本研究的目的是评估不同的DNA提取方法,以改进对血流中感染性病原体的检测。具体而言,我们将一种基于柱的DNA提取方法(QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit)与两种基于磁珠的DNA提取方法(K-SL DNA Extraction Kit和GraBon™系统)进行了比较。使用特异性引物进行实时PCR以评估每种方法的效率。与QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit相比,K-SL DNA Extraction Kit和GraBon™系统分别表现出更高的准确率,为77.5%(22/40)和76.5%(21/40),而QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit对大肠杆菌检测的准确率为65.0%(12/40),而GraBon™系统在检测金黄色葡萄球菌时显示出比其他两种方法更高的准确率,为77.5%(22/40),其他两种方法的准确率为67.5%(14/40)。所有方法对阴性样本均显示出高特异性(100%)。这些发现突出了基于磁珠的方法,特别是自动化时,从全血样本中提取细菌DNA的卓越性能。此类方法可能实现对血流感染更快速准确的诊断,潜在地改善患者预后。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Culture-independent detection systems for bloodstream infection.用于血流感染的非培养检测系统。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Feb;28(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.039. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Emerging Technologies for Molecular Diagnosis of Sepsis.脓毒症分子诊断的新兴技术。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Feb 28;31(2). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00089-17. Print 2018 Apr.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验