Harrison Krista L, Morgan Brianna E, Friend Juliana, Garrett Sarah B, Looi David, Halim Madina, James Jennifer E, Boyd Nicole D, Gilissen Joni, Geschwind Michael D, Ritchie Christine S, Smith Alexander K
Division of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1406-1418. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19382. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
One in three older adults in the United States dies with or from dementia. Little is known about whether end-of-life caregiving experiences differ by dementia diagnosis.
We conducted a secondary analysis of two qualitative studies. Participants included caregivers of decedents with "rapid-type" sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (sCJD, survival prognosis of < 1 year) or "slow-type" Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (survival prognosis of 5-20 years). We used reflexive thematic analysis and a novel method, poetic analysis, to compare end-of-life caregiving experiences.
"Rapid-type" caregivers (n = 12) had a median age of 59 (range 45-73) years; 6 were female, and 9 were spouses. "Slow-type" caregivers (n = 15) had a median age of 69 (45-82) years; 9 were female, and 11 were spouses. We identified three main areas of differential experience that were influenced by syndrome rarity and participation in research yet hinged on time. Time enables preparation: Due to the rarity of sCJD, "rapid-type" caregivers struggled to obtain accurate diagnoses, which prevented preparation for end-of-life care. Weeks or months before death, specialists simultaneously disclosed sCJD diagnoses and recommended hospice. In contrast, for "slow-type" dementia, preparation began years before death. Time complicates conflict: Most "rapid-type" caregivers described conflicts, rarely resolved before death, about code status, treatment, or care location decisions. Fewer "slow-type" caregivers experienced such conflicts, and these were typically resolved before death; instead, they experienced conflict between needs and what the care system provides. Postmortem experience contrasts with perimortem: For "rapid-type" dementia, short perimortem periods contrasted with elongated and often intense postmortem logistics and grief. For "slow-type" caregivers, preparation and perimortem grieving typically led to shorter duration and minimally intrusive postmortem logistics and grief.
End-of-life care for dementia should attend to and support axes of differential experience based on diagnosis and rarity, time since symptom onset (affecting preparation and conflict resolution), and participation in research studies.
在美国,每三名老年人中就有一人死于痴呆症或因痴呆症死亡。对于临终护理经历是否因痴呆症诊断不同而有所差异,人们知之甚少。
我们对两项定性研究进行了二次分析。参与者包括患有“快速型”散发性克雅氏病(sCJD,生存预后小于1年)或“缓慢型”阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(生存预后为5至20年)的死者的照料者。我们使用反思性主题分析和一种新方法——诗歌分析,来比较临终护理经历。
“快速型”照料者(n = 12)的中位年龄为59岁(范围45 - 73岁);6名女性,9名配偶。“缓慢型”照料者(n = 15)的中位年龄为69岁(45 - 82岁);9名女性,11名配偶。我们确定了受综合征罕见性和参与研究影响但取决于时间的三个主要差异体验领域。时间有助于准备:由于sCJD罕见,“快速型”照料者难以获得准确诊断,这妨碍了为临终护理做准备。在死亡前几周或几个月,专家同时披露sCJD诊断并建议临终关怀。相比之下,对于“缓慢型”痴呆症,准备工作在死亡前数年就开始了。时间使冲突复杂化:大多数“快速型”照料者描述了关于代码状态、治疗或护理地点决策的冲突,这些冲突在死亡前很少得到解决。较少“缓慢型”照料者经历此类冲突,并且这些冲突通常在死亡前得到解决;相反,他们经历了需求与护理系统所提供内容之间的冲突。死后经历与濒死期形成对比:对于“快速型”痴呆症,短暂的濒死期与冗长且往往强烈的死后后勤和悲伤形成对比。对于“缓慢型”照料者,准备工作和濒死期悲伤通常导致较短的持续时间以及最少干扰性的死后后勤和悲伤。
痴呆症的临终护理应关注并支持基于诊断和罕见性、症状出现后的时间(影响准备工作和冲突解决)以及参与研究的差异体验轴。