Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Information Statistics, Andong National University, Andong, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1384-1391. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2019-1728.R3.
Hospital case volume is shown to be associated with postoperative outcomes in various types of surgery. However, conflicting results of volume-outcome relationship have been reported in hip fracture surgery. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the association between hospital case volume and postoperative outcomes in patients who had hip fracture surgery. We hypothesized that higher case volume would be associated with lower risk of in-hospital and one-year mortality after hip fracture surgery.
Data for all patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture from January 2008 to December 2016 were extracted from the Korean National Healthcare Insurance Service database. According to mean annual case volume of surgery for hip fracture, hospitals were classified into very low (< 30 cases/year), low (30 to 50 cases/year), intermediate (50 to 100 cases/year), high (100 to 150 cases/year), or very high (> 150 cases/year) groups. The association between hospital case volume and in-hospital mortality or one-year mortality was assessed using the logistic regression model to adjust for age, sex, type of fracture, type of anaesthesia, transfusion, comorbidities, and year of surgery.
Between January 2008 and December 2016, 269,535 patients underwent hip fracture surgery in 1,567 hospitals in Korea. Compared to hospitals with very high volume, in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in those with high volume (odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval ((CI) 1.02 to 1.17, p = 0.011), low volume (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.32, p < 0.001), and very low volume (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.34, p < 0.001). Similarly, hospitals with lower case volume showed higher one-year mortality rates compared to hospitals with very high case volume (low volume group, OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.19, p < 0.001; very low volume group, OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.14, p < 0.001).
Higher hospital case volume of hip fracture surgery was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality in a dose-response fashion. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(10):1384-1391.
手术类型不同,医院手术量与术后结果相关。然而,髋部骨折手术的量效关系结果存在争议。本回顾性队列研究旨在评估髋部骨折手术患者的医院手术量与术后结果之间的关系。我们假设更高的病例量与髋部骨折手术后院内和一年死亡率的风险降低相关。
从韩国国家医疗保险服务数据库中提取 2008 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间所有接受髋部骨折手术的患者的数据。根据髋部骨折手术的年平均病例量,医院被分为极低(<30 例/年)、低(30-50 例/年)、中(50-100 例/年)、高(100-150 例/年)或极高(>150 例/年)组。使用逻辑回归模型调整年龄、性别、骨折类型、麻醉类型、输血、合并症和手术年份,评估医院病例量与院内死亡率或一年死亡率之间的关系。
2008 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间,韩国 1567 家医院共 269535 例患者接受了髋部骨折手术。与高容量医院相比,高容量(比值比(OR)1.10,95%置信区间(CI)1.02 至 1.17,p=0.011)、低容量(OR 1.22,95%CI 1.14 至 1.32,p<0.001)和极低容量(OR 1.25,95%CI 1.16 至 1.34,p<0.001)医院的院内死亡率明显更高。同样,与高容量医院相比,低容量(低容量组,OR 1.15,95%CI 1.11 至 1.19,p<0.001;极低容量组,OR 1.10,95%CI 1.07 至 1.14,p<0.001)和极低容量医院的一年死亡率更高。
髋部骨折手术的医院病例量较高与院内死亡率和一年死亡率呈剂量反应关系。