Low Lian Leng, Tan Shu Yun, Ng Matthew Joo Ming, Tay Wei Yi, Ng Lee Beng, Balasubramaniam Kanchana, Towle Rachel Marie, Lee Kheng Hock
Department of Family Medicine & Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Family Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168757. eCollection 2017.
Emerging evidence from the virtual ward care model showed that multidisciplinary case management are inadequate to reduce readmissions or death for high risk patients. There is consensus that interventions should encompass both pre-hospital discharge and post-discharge transitional care to be effective. Integrated practice units (IPU) had been proposed as an approach of restructuring the organization and work processes of multidisciplinary teams to achieve value in healthcare. Our primary objective is to evaluate if the novel application of the IPU concept to organize a modified virtual ward model incorporating pre-hospital discharge transitional care can reduce readmissions of patients at highest risk for readmission.
We conducted an open label, assessor blinded randomized controlled trial on patients with one or more unscheduled readmissions in the prior 90 days and LACE score ≥ 10. 840 patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio and blocks of 6 to the intervention program (n = 420) or control (n = 420). Allocation concealment was effected via an off-site telephone service maintained by a hospital administrator. Intervention patients received discharge planning, medication reconciliation, coaching on self-management of chronic diseases using standardized action plans and an individualized care plan complete with written discharge instructions, appointments schedule, medication changes and the contact information of the outpatient VW nurse before discharge. At discharge, care is handed over to the outpatient VW team. Patients were closely monitored in the VW for three months that included a telephone review within 72 hours of discharge, home assessment, regular telephone reviews to identify early complications and early review clinics for patients who destabilize. The VW meet daily to discuss new patients and review care plans for patients. Control patients received standard hospital care that included a standardized patient copy of the hospital discharge summary listing their medical diagnoses and medications; and follow up is arranged with a primary care provider or specialist as considered necessary. The primary outcome was the unplanned readmission rate to any hospital within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included the unplanned readmission rate, emergency department (ED) attendance rate to any hospital and the probability without readmission or death up to 180 days of discharge. Length of stay and mortality rate at 90-day were compared between the two groups. Outcome data were objectively retrieved from the hospital and National Electronic Health Records by a blinded outcome assessor.
All patients' outcomes were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. The characteristics of both study groups were similar. Patients in the intervention group had a significant reduction in the number of 30-day readmissions, IRR 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.86, p = 0.001) and the number of 30-day emergency department attendances, IRR 0.60 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.79, p<0.001) compared to those receiving standard hospital care. The effectiveness was sustained at 90 and 180 days. The intervention group utilized 1164 fewer hospital bed days at 90-day post discharge. No adverse events were reported.
Applying the integrated practice unit concept to the virtual ward program resulted in reduced readmissions in patients who are at highest risk of readmission.
虚拟病房护理模式的新证据表明,多学科病例管理在降低高危患者的再入院率或死亡率方面并不充分。人们一致认为,干预措施应包括出院前和出院后的过渡护理,才能有效。综合实践单元(IPU)已被提议作为一种重组多学科团队的组织和工作流程以实现医疗保健价值的方法。我们的主要目标是评估将IPU概念新颖地应用于组织一个纳入出院前过渡护理的改良虚拟病房模式是否可以降低再入院风险最高的患者的再入院率。
我们对在过去90天内有一次或多次非计划再入院且LACE评分≥10的患者进行了一项开放标签、评估者盲法随机对照试验。840名患者按1:1的比例随机分组,每6人一组,分别进入干预组(n = 420)或对照组(n = 420)。通过医院管理人员维护的场外电话服务进行分配隐藏。干预组患者在出院前接受出院计划、用药核对、使用标准化行动计划进行慢性病自我管理指导以及一份个性化护理计划,其中包括书面出院指导、预约时间表、用药变更以及门诊虚拟病房护士的联系信息。出院时,护理工作移交给门诊虚拟病房团队。患者在虚拟病房中接受为期三个月的密切监测,包括出院后72小时内的电话复查、家庭评估、定期电话复查以识别早期并发症以及为病情不稳定的患者设立的早期复查诊所。虚拟病房每天开会讨论新患者并复查患者的护理计划。对照组患者接受标准医院护理,包括一份标准化的患者出院小结副本,列出他们的医疗诊断和用药情况;并根据需要安排与初级保健提供者或专科医生的随访。主要结局是出院后30天内任何医院的非计划再入院率。次要结局包括非计划再入院率、任何医院的急诊科就诊率以及出院后180天内无再入院或死亡的概率。比较两组90天的住院时间和死亡率。结局数据由一名盲法结局评估者从医院和国家电子健康记录中客观获取。
所有患者的结局都纳入意向性分析。两个研究组的特征相似。与接受标准医院护理的患者相比,干预组患者的30天再入院次数显著减少,风险比(IRR)为0.67(95%置信区间,0.52至0.86,p = 0.001),30天急诊科就诊次数也显著减少,IRR为0.60(95%置信区间,0.46至0.79,p<0.001)。这种有效性在90天和180天时持续存在。干预组在出院后90天使用的医院病床天数减少了1164天。未报告不良事件。
将综合实践单元概念应用于虚拟病房计划可降低再入院风险最高的患者的再入院率。