Barros Edna Moreira, Patrício Bispo-Júnior José, Soares Luzia Célia Batista, Serapioni Mauro
Instituto Multidisciplinar de Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brasil.
Centro de Estudos Sociais, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Feb 7;40(12):e00115524. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT115524. eCollection 2025.
The action of social representatives greatly influences the performance of health councils and the quality of participatory management in the Brazilian Unified National Health System. This study aimed to analyze the mechanisms of representation and forms of representativeness within health councils in municipalities of different population sizes. This multiple case study was carried out in Vitória da Conquista, Guanambi, and Urandi, in Bahia State, Brazil. Data and information were obtained by document analysis, observation of plenary meetings, and interviews with 30 health board members. A theoretical matrix structured in five dimensions was used for data analysis: the process to choose representatives; relationships between representatives and those who are represented; types of represented interests; criteria to define positions; and participatory practice. Results showed the predominance of non-electoral criteria to choose representatives. The relationship between representatives and those who are represented shows the former's isolation and reduced accountability. Individual conscience predominated as the board defined positions. The population size of the municipalities also influenced representation in health councils as that with the smallest population evinced consistent weaknesses for the exercise of representation. Results showed insufficiencies in the representative process. This study stresses the need to draw representatives and those they represent near each other and the importance of valuing experiential knowledge as an element that can grant legitimacy to representation.
社会代表的行动对巴西统一国家卫生系统中卫生委员会的绩效以及参与式管理的质量有很大影响。本研究旨在分析不同人口规模城市的卫生委员会内部的代表机制和代表性形式。这项多案例研究在巴西巴伊亚州的维多利亚达孔基斯塔、瓜纳比和乌兰迪进行。通过文件分析、全体会议观察以及对30名卫生委员会成员的访谈获取数据和信息。使用一个在五个维度构建的理论矩阵进行数据分析:选择代表的过程;代表与被代表者之间的关系;被代表利益的类型;确定立场的标准;以及参与式实践。结果显示选择代表时非选举标准占主导。代表与被代表者之间的关系显示出前者的孤立和问责制的削弱。在委员会确定立场时个人良知占主导。城市的人口规模也影响了卫生委员会中的代表性,因为人口最少的城市在行使代表性方面表现出持续的弱点。结果显示代表过程存在不足。本研究强调需要拉近代表与被代表者之间的距离,以及重视经验知识作为一种可为代表性赋予合法性的要素的重要性。