Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia. R. Basílio da Gama s/n, Canela. 40110-040 Salvador BA Brasil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Família na Sociedade Contemporânea, Universidade Católica do Salvador. Salvador BA Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Jan;26(1):319-328. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020261.08872019. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
This paper aimed to identify the thinking currents used for scientific production on health councils and conferences, from 1990 to 2017. This is an integrative review of literature carried out at the SciELO, LILACS and CAPES journals portals that resulted in the selection of 152 papers. They were analyzed by year of publication, author's institutional origin, dissemination media, object and type of study and theoretical approach. We identified that a gradual increase occurred in the number of publications over the study period and most empirical studies (92.8%) do not explicitly state the use of any theoretical approach in data analysis. The structuralist, post-structuralist and neo-institutionalist approaches used were mediated by a theoretical model, medium-range theories and concepts of authors of the European, North American and Latin American traditions. The knowledge produced about health council and conference in Brazil may benefit even more from the density of theoretical approaches to social and political sciences.
本文旨在识别 1990 年至 2017 年期间用于健康委员会和会议的科学研究的思维潮流。这是在 SciELO、LILACS 和 CAPES 期刊门户进行的文献综述,共选择了 152 篇论文。根据出版年份、作者机构来源、传播媒介、研究对象和类型以及理论方法进行了分析。我们发现,在研究期间,出版物的数量逐渐增加,而且大多数经验研究(92.8%)没有明确说明在数据分析中使用任何理论方法。所使用的结构主义、后结构主义和新制度主义方法是由欧洲、北美和拉丁美洲传统的理论模型、中程理论和作者概念中介的。关于巴西健康委员会和会议的知识生产可能会从更多的社会和政治学理论方法中受益。