• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风特异性认知筛查工具《牛津认知筛查量表韩语版》(K-OCS)的验证

Validation of Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), a Post Stroke-Specific Cognitive Screening Tool.

作者信息

Cho Eunyoung, Choi Sungwon, Demeyere Nele, Kim Rina, Lim Ikhyun, Kim MinYoung

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Psychology, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;49(1):5-14. doi: 10.5535/arm.240099. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

DOI:10.5535/arm.240099
PMID:39939896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11895051/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish and evaluate the validity of the recently developed Korean version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), this study verified its reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Between November 2021 and December 2023, we recruited 72 patients with stroke from our hospital who agreed to participate in the study. The patients were repeatedly tested using K-OCS by the same or different assessors to estimate inter- and intra-rater reliability. To demonstrate the validity and usability of K-OCS, the test results of screening tools currently used in clinical practice, including the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination and the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, were used in comparison analyses.

RESULTS

The subtests of K-OCS demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.914-0.998) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.913-0.994). We found moderate-to-strong correlations for convergent validity for the subsets (r=0.378- 0.979, p<0.01), and low-to-moderate discriminant validity correlations. The optimal cut-offs estimated for the subtests of the K-OCS showed a good-to-high range of specificity (94.8%- 100%). The positive predictive value was 58.2%-100% and negative predictive value was 65.6%-98.4%. Sensitivity was estimated at 25.6%-86.9%.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that K-OCS is a reliable and valid tool for screening cognitive impairment in patients post-stroke.

摘要

目的

为建立并评估最新开发的韩语版牛津认知筛查量表(K-OCS)的有效性,本研究验证了其信度、效度及诊断准确性。

方法

在2021年11月至2023年12月期间,我们从我院招募了72名同意参与研究的中风患者。由相同或不同评估者使用K-OCS对患者进行重复测试,以评估评分者间信度和评分者内信度。为证明K-OCS的有效性和实用性,在比较分析中使用了目前临床实践中使用的筛查工具的测试结果,包括韩国简易精神状态检查表和韩语版蒙特利尔认知评估量表。

结果

K-OCS的各子测试显示出优异的评分者间信度(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.914 - 0.998)和重测信度(ICC=0.913 - 0.994)。我们发现各子集的聚合效度存在中度至强相关性(r=0.378 - 0.979,p<0.01),以及低度至中度的区分效度相关性。K-OCS各子测试估计的最佳截断值显示出良好至高范围的特异性(94.8% - 100%)。阳性预测值为58.2% - 100%,阴性预测值为65.6% - 98.4%。敏感性估计为25.6% - 86.9%。

结论

本研究结果表明,K-OCS是一种可靠且有效的中风后患者认知障碍筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb7/11895051/f1dfebc1e4ff/arm-240099f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb7/11895051/784fc1cc23bc/arm-240099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb7/11895051/f1dfebc1e4ff/arm-240099f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb7/11895051/784fc1cc23bc/arm-240099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb7/11895051/f1dfebc1e4ff/arm-240099f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), a Post Stroke-Specific Cognitive Screening Tool.中风特异性认知筛查工具《牛津认知筛查量表韩语版》(K-OCS)的验证
Ann Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;49(1):5-14. doi: 10.5535/arm.240099. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (S-OCS): psychometric properties of a short cognitive stroke-specific screening tool.验证西班牙版牛津认知筛查(S-OCS):一种简短的认知障碍特异性筛查工具的心理测量学特性。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr;33(4):724-736. doi: 10.1177/0269215518819046. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
3
Adaptation of Oxford Cognitive Screen into Turkish (OCS-TR): Validity and reliability study in stroke survivors.牛津认知筛查量表土耳其语版(OCS-TR)的改编:中风幸存者的效度和信度研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 24;13(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02351-6.
4
The German version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (D-OCS): Normative data and validation in acute stroke and a mixed neurological sample.《牛津认知筛查(D-OCS)德语版:急性脑卒中与混合神经科样本的常模数据与验证》
J Neuropsychol. 2024 Sep;18(3):377-390. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12359. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
The Hong Kong version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (HK-OCS): validation study for Cantonese-speaking chronic stroke survivors.牛津认知筛查香港版(HK-OCS):粤语为母语的慢性中风幸存者的验证研究。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016 Sep;23(5):530-48. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1127321. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
6
The Korean Version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP): A Reliability and Validity Study.韩国版卒中患者认知评估量表(K-CASP):一项信效度研究
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;41(3):362-375. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.362. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
7
The Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS) Normative Study.《牛津认知筛查量表韩国版(K-OCS)的常模研究》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;48(1):22-30. doi: 10.5535/arm.23149. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Validation of the UK English Oxford cognitive screen-plus in sub-acute and chronic stroke survivors.英国英语版牛津认知筛查升级版在亚急性和慢性卒中幸存者中的验证
Eur Stroke J. 2022 Dec;7(4):476-486. doi: 10.1177/23969873221119940. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
The Russian version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen: Validation study on stroke survivors.牛津认知筛查量表俄文版:对中风幸存者的验证研究。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jan;33(1):77-92. doi: 10.1037/neu0000491. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Patients: A Comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination.使用牛津认知筛查量表检测卒中患者的认知障碍:与简易精神状态检查表的比较
Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 28;9:101. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00101. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS) Normative Study.《牛津认知筛查量表韩国版(K-OCS)的常模研究》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;48(1):22-30. doi: 10.5535/arm.23149. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
The German version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (D-OCS): Normative data and validation in acute stroke and a mixed neurological sample.《牛津认知筛查(D-OCS)德语版:急性脑卒中与混合神经科样本的常模数据与验证》
J Neuropsychol. 2024 Sep;18(3):377-390. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12359. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
3
Cognitive Impairment After Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
《缺血性卒中和出血性卒中后的认知障碍:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会的科学声明》
Stroke. 2023 Jun;54(6):e272-e291. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000430. Epub 2023 May 1.
4
Cognitive Deficits After Stroke.中风后的认知缺陷
Stroke. 2023 Jan;54(1):5-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041775. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
The Oxford Cognitive Screen for use with Australian people after stroke (OCS-AU): The adaptation process and determining cut scores for cognitive impairment using a cross-sectional normative study.《用于澳大利亚脑卒中患者的牛津认知筛查(OCS-AU):使用横断面规范研究确定认知障碍的适应过程和截断分数》
Aust Occup Ther J. 2023 Feb;70(1):73-85. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12838. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
The Dutch Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): psychometric properties in Flemish stroke survivors.荷兰牛津认知筛查(OCS-NL):在弗拉芒中风幸存者中的心理测量学特性。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6349-6358. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06314-2. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
7
The European Portuguese version of the Oxford Cognitive Screening (OCS-Pt): a screening test for acute stroke patients.《牛津认知筛查(OCS-Pt)的欧洲葡萄牙语版本:急性脑卒中患者的筛查测试》。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jun;43(6):3717-3728. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-05880-9. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?在急性卒中环境中,谁被归类为简短认知筛查中不可测试的对象?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Aug 14;9(3):95. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9030095.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia in the first year post-stroke.卒中后第一年非痴呆性认知障碍患病率的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):160-171. doi: 10.1177/2396987318825484. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
10
Patterns of Recovery From Aphasia in the First 2 Weeks After Stroke.脑卒中后 2 周内失语症恢复模式。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Mar 25;62(3):723-732. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0254.