• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰牛津认知筛查(OCS-NL):在弗拉芒中风幸存者中的心理测量学特性。

The Dutch Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): psychometric properties in Flemish stroke survivors.

机构信息

Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6349-6358. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06314-2. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10072-022-06314-2
PMID:35971043
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Oxford Cognitive Screen is a stroke-specific screen to evaluate attention, executive functions, memory, praxis, language, and numeric cognition. It was originally validated in England for acute stroke patients. In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the Dutch OCS (OCS-NL).

METHODS

A total of 193 (99 acute stroke unit, 94 rehabilitation unit) patients were included in our study. A subset of patients (n = 128) completed a retest with the parallel version of the OCS-NL.

RESULTS

First, we did not find evidence for a difference in prevalence of impairment between patients in the acute stroke versus rehabilitation unit on all but one of the subtests. For praxis, we observed a 14% lower prevalence of impairment in the rehabilitation than the acute stroke unit. Second, the parallel-form reliability ranged from weak to excellent across subtests. Third, in stroke patients below age 60, the OCS-NL had a 92% sensitivity relative to the MoCA, while the MoCA had a 55% sensitivity relative to the OCS-NL. Last, although left-hemispheric stroke patients performed worse on almost all MoCA subdomains, they performed similarly to right-hemispheric stroke patients on non-language domains on the OCS-NL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the OCS-NL is a reliable cognitive screen that can be used in acute stroke and rehabilitation units. The OCS-NL may be more sensitive to detect cognitive impairment in young stroke patients and less likely to underestimate cognitive abilities in left-hemispheric stroke patients than the MoCA.

摘要

背景与目的

牛津认知筛查(Oxford Cognitive Screen,OCS)是一种针对脑卒中患者的特异性认知筛查工具,可评估注意力、执行功能、记忆、执行功能、语言和数字认知。该量表最初在英国进行了急性脑卒中患者的验证。在本研究中,我们检验了荷兰版 OCS(OCS-NL)的心理测量学特性。

方法

共纳入 193 例(99 例急性脑卒中单元,94 例康复单元)患者。其中一部分患者(n=128)完成了 OCS-NL 平行版的复测。

结果

首先,我们并未发现急性脑卒中单元和康复单元患者在除一个亚测试外的所有其他亚测试中,其认知损伤的发生率存在差异。对于执行功能,我们观察到康复单元的认知损伤发生率比急性脑卒中单元低 14%。其次,平行形式的可靠性在各亚测试间从弱到强不等。第三,在年龄小于 60 岁的脑卒中患者中,OCS-NL 的敏感性为 92%,而 MoCA 的敏感性为 55%。最后,尽管左侧脑卒中患者在 MoCA 的几乎所有亚域的表现均较差,但在 OCS-NL 的非语言域的表现与右侧脑卒中患者相似。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,OCS-NL 是一种可靠的认知筛查工具,可在急性脑卒中单元和康复单元中使用。与 MoCA 相比,OCS-NL 可能更能敏感地检测到年轻脑卒中患者的认知障碍,并且不太可能低估左侧脑卒中患者的认知能力。

相似文献

1
The Dutch Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): psychometric properties in Flemish stroke survivors.荷兰牛津认知筛查(OCS-NL):在弗拉芒中风幸存者中的心理测量学特性。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6349-6358. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06314-2. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
The Dutch version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): normative data and their association with age and socio-economic status.荷兰版牛津认知筛查(OCS-NL):常模数据及其与年龄和社会经济地位的关联。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 Sep;27(5):765-786. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1680598. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
3
Oxford cognitive screen: A critical review and independent psychometric evaluation.牛津认知筛查:批判性评价与独立心理计量学评估
J Neuropsychol. 2023 Sep;17(3):491-504. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12318. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
The Hong Kong version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (HK-OCS): validation study for Cantonese-speaking chronic stroke survivors.牛津认知筛查香港版(HK-OCS):粤语为母语的慢性中风幸存者的验证研究。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016 Sep;23(5):530-48. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1127321. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
5
The Russian version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen: Validation study on stroke survivors.牛津认知筛查量表俄文版:对中风幸存者的验证研究。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jan;33(1):77-92. doi: 10.1037/neu0000491. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
Domain-specific versus generalized cognitive screening in acute stroke.急性卒中中特定领域认知筛查与一般认知筛查的比较
J Neurol. 2016 Feb;263(2):306-315. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7964-4. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese (Putonghua) Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-P) in Subacute Poststroke Patients without Neglect.中文版牛津认知筛查量表(OCS-P)在亚急性脑卒中后无忽视患者中的心理测量特性。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 21;2018:6827854. doi: 10.1155/2018/6827854. eCollection 2018.
8
The cultural and linguistic adaptation of the Oxford Cognitive Screen to Tamil.牛津认知筛查量表的泰米尔语文化和语言适应性。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Dec;29(10):964-971. doi: 10.1017/S135561772300067X. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (S-OCS): psychometric properties of a short cognitive stroke-specific screening tool.验证西班牙版牛津认知筛查(S-OCS):一种简短的认知障碍特异性筛查工具的心理测量学特性。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr;33(4):724-736. doi: 10.1177/0269215518819046. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool.牛津认知筛查量表(OCS):一种针对中风的简短认知筛查工具的验证
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):883-94. doi: 10.1037/pas0000082. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-stroke sensory hypersensitivity: insights from lesion-symptom and disconnection mapping.中风后感觉超敏反应:来自病变-症状和神经连接中断映射的见解
Brain Commun. 2025 May 6;7(3):fcaf176. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf176. eCollection 2025.
2
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.
3
Validation of Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), a Post Stroke-Specific Cognitive Screening Tool.中风特异性认知筛查工具《牛津认知筛查量表韩语版》(K-OCS)的验证
Ann Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;49(1):5-14. doi: 10.5535/arm.240099. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
4
The Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS) Normative Study.《牛津认知筛查量表韩国版(K-OCS)的常模研究》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;48(1):22-30. doi: 10.5535/arm.23149. Epub 2024 Feb 28.