Suppr超能文献

通过微波和生物方法对废旧轮胎橡胶进行脱硫:综述

Devulcanization of Waste Tire Rubber via Microwave and Biological Methods: A Review.

作者信息

Vahdatbin Mostafa, Hajikarimi Pouria, Fini Ellie H

机构信息

School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran.

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran 1591634311, Iran.

出版信息

Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jan 22;17(3):285. doi: 10.3390/polym17030285.

Abstract

This paper presents a thorough literature review on devulcanization methods applied to waste tire rubber: "microwave devulcanization" and "biological desulfurization". To do so, 80 papers published from the year 1990 to 2024 in journals with subscription and open access status across 12 databases were reviewed. This paper compares the efficacy and reviews the basic concepts, advantages, processes, and variable parameters of these two methods. In microwave devulcanization, microwave energy breaks the sulfur crosslinks between polymer chains. The latter breakage is mainly enabled by the presence of carbon black in the tire, which is an excellent microwave absorbent. In biological desulfurization, bacteria or fungi convert the crosslinks to elemental sulfur substances or sulfate. In general, microwave devulcanization of rubber leads to a lower crosslink density and thus a higher degree of devulcanization. On the one hand, breaking the crosslinks requires a significantly shorter time than biological desulfurization. Crosslink scission occurs throughout the sample in microwave devulcanization but only on the sample surface in biological desulfurization. Microwave devulcanization is not sensitive to rubber additives and does not require detoxification before devulcanization. On the other hand, biological desulfurization requires detoxification before devulcanization since it involves living organisms that may not tolerate certain rubber additives.

摘要

本文对应用于废旧轮胎橡胶的脱硫方法

“微波脱硫”和“生物脱硫”进行了全面的文献综述。为此,对1990年至2024年期间在12个数据库中具有订阅和开放获取状态的期刊上发表的80篇论文进行了综述。本文比较了这两种方法的效果,并综述了它们的基本概念、优点、工艺和可变参数。在微波脱硫中,微波能量打破聚合物链之间的硫交联。后者的断裂主要是由于轮胎中存在炭黑,炭黑是一种优良的微波吸收剂。在生物脱硫中,细菌或真菌将交联键转化为元素硫物质或硫酸盐。一般来说,橡胶的微波脱硫会导致较低的交联密度,从而具有较高的脱硫程度。一方面,打破交联键所需的时间比生物脱硫要短得多。在微波脱硫中,交联键断裂发生在整个样品中,而在生物脱硫中仅发生在样品表面。微波脱硫对橡胶添加剂不敏感,脱硫前不需要解毒。另一方面,生物脱硫在脱硫前需要解毒,因为它涉及可能无法耐受某些橡胶添加剂的生物体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/944b/11820376/31fd759ad1be/polymers-17-00285-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验