• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Battery for fall risk assessment in older adult people-BARQ: analysis of reliability and objectivity.老年人跌倒风险评估量表——BARQ:可靠性与客观性分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;12:1456564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456564. eCollection 2024.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation, content validity, and reliability of the Amharic version of the modified John-Hopkins fall risk assessment scale among older adults who attend home health care services.接受家庭医疗服务的老年人中,阿姆哈拉语版改良约翰-霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表的跨文化适应性、内容效度和信度。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;12:1470517. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1470517. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for older Chinese inpatients.中文版约翰霍普金斯老年中国住院患者跌倒风险评估工具的心理测量学验证
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2846-53. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13331. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Development and validation of a robotic multifactorial fall-risk predictive model: A one-year prospective study in community-dwelling older adults.开发和验证一种机器人多因素跌倒风险预测模型:一项针对社区居住的老年人群体的为期一年的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0234904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234904. eCollection 2020.
5
Investigating the psychometric properties of the Carers' Fall Concern instrument to measure carers' concern for older people at risk of falling at home: A cross-sectional study.调查照护者跌倒担忧量表的心理测量特性,以测量照护者对家中有跌倒风险的老年人的担忧:一项横断面研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Dec;15(4):e12338. doi: 10.1111/opn.12338. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
6
The community balance and mobility scale alleviates the ceiling effects observed in the currently used gait and balance assessments for the community-dwelling older adults.社区平衡与移动量表减轻了目前用于社区居住老年人步态和平衡评估中所观察到的天花板效应。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015 Apr-Jun;38(2):78-89. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000024.
7
The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale.用于测量生理跌倒风险的亚琛移动与平衡指数:与Tinetti POMA量表的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0693-2. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
8
Assessing the relative and absolute reliability of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International questionnaire in elderly individuals with increased fall risk and the questionnaire's convergent validity in elderly women with osteoporosis.评估 Falls Efficacy Scale-International 问卷在有较高跌倒风险的老年人中的相对和绝对可靠性,以及该问卷在患有骨质疏松症的老年女性中的聚合效度。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jun;24(6):1853-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2197-1. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
9
The reliability and predictive accuracy of the falls risk for older people in the community assessment (FROP-Com) tool.社区老年人跌倒风险评估工具(FROP-Com)的可靠性和预测准确性。
Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):634-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn129. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
10
[Assessment of balance in community dwelling older adults: reliability and validity of the German version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale].[社区居住老年人平衡能力评估:德国版富勒顿高级平衡量表的信效度]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Dec;44(6):417-28. doi: 10.1007/s00391-011-0236-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of Obstacle-Crossing Parameters during Overground Walking in Young Adults.成年人地面行走时跨越障碍物参数的可靠性。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 24;24(11):3387. doi: 10.3390/s24113387.
2
Prolonged hospitalization and 1-year mortality are associated with sarcopenia and malnutrition in older patients with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study.2型糖尿病老年患者的住院时间延长及1年死亡率与肌肉减少症和营养不良相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jan;207:111063. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111063. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
3
Effects of a clinical decision support system and patient portal for preventing medication-related falls in older fallers: Protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded process and economic evaluations (ADFICE_IT).预防老年人跌倒相关药物事件的临床决策支持系统和患者门户的效果:一项具有嵌入式过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验方案(ADFICE_IT)。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 26;18(9):e0289385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289385. eCollection 2023.
4
Post-Hospital Falls Among the Older Population: The Temporal Pattern in Risk and Healthcare Burden.老年人群出院后跌倒:风险和医疗负担的时间模式
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Oct;24(10):1478-1483.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
5
Interobserver variability studies in diagnostic imaging: a methodological systematic review.诊断影像学中的观察者间变异性研究:方法学系统评价。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Aug;96(1148):20220972. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220972. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
6
Differences in fall-related characteristics across cognitive disorders.认知障碍患者在跌倒相关特征方面的差异。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jun 9;15:1171306. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1171306. eCollection 2023.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls.老年人和跌倒高风险人群跌倒恐惧相关评估工具的测量特性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2023 May 1;52(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad055.
8
Falls caused by balance disorders in the elderly with multiple systems involved: Pathogenic mechanisms and treatment strategies.多系统受累老年患者平衡障碍所致跌倒:发病机制与治疗策略
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1128092. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1128092. eCollection 2023.
9
The risk of falls among the aging population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人跌倒的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:902599. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902599. eCollection 2022.
10
Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review.德尔菲技术在健康科学中的报告指南:方法学综述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

老年人跌倒风险评估量表——BARQ:可靠性与客观性分析

Battery for fall risk assessment in older adult people-BARQ: analysis of reliability and objectivity.

作者信息

Guimarães Andrea Carmen, D'Louar Costa Maia Brisa, Dantas Karollyni Bastos Andrade, Santos Gustavo Costa, Américo Letícia Moreira, Werner Nelzy Aparecida Silva, da Costa Lucio Flávio Gomes Ribeiro, da Silva Santos César Augusto, Dantas Estélio Henrique Martin

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, Doctor of Federal University of São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;12:1456564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456564. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456564
PMID:39944572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11813778/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to address significant gaps in fall risk assessment among older adult individuals, using a methodological approach to develop and validate effective instruments.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the objectivity and reliability of the Battery for Fall Risk Assessment in older adult people - BARQ.

METHODOLOGY

This descriptive, cross-sectional, exploratory study started with a preliminary version of BARQ, based on the Comprehensive Falls Risk Screening Instrument-CFRSI. The following variables were included: Fall History and Adverse Events (FH), Medication Use (MU), Home Safety (HS), Balance (Ba), Mobility (Mo), and Visual Acuity (VA). BARQ was administered to 136 older adult participants (X̅ = 70.3 ± 7.20 years) by two assessment teams (∝ and ), at three different times, to examine instrument reliability and objectivity. Statistical analyses included Pearson's correlation, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Student's -test, and Hedges' g.

RESULTS

Intra-rater and inter-rater correlations were significant for mobility ( = 0.90 and  = 0.88, respectively;  < 0.01) and visual acuity ( = 0.86 and  = 0.87, respectively;  < 0.01). Cronbach's alpha coefficients indicated nearly perfect reliability for mobility (0.97) and visual acuity (0.96). No statistically significant differences were found in intra-rater assessments (p ranging from 0.11 to 0.55) and inter-rater assessments (p ranging from 0.37 to 0.55). Hedges' g test showed medium effect sizes for the overall fall risk index between S1 and S2 ( = 0.39) and small to medium for other variables.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在填补老年个体跌倒风险评估方面的重大空白,采用一种方法来开发和验证有效的工具。

目的

确立老年人跌倒风险评估量表(BARQ)的客观性和可靠性。

方法

本描述性、横断面、探索性研究始于基于综合跌倒风险筛查工具(CFRSI)的BARQ初步版本。纳入了以下变量:跌倒史和不良事件(FH)、药物使用(MU)、家庭安全(HS)、平衡能力(Ba)、活动能力(Mo)和视力(VA)。由两个评估团队(α和β)在三个不同时间对136名老年参与者(X̅ = 70.3 ± 7.20岁)进行BARQ评估,以检验该工具的可靠性和客观性。统计分析包括Pearson相关性、Cronbach's α系数、Student's t检验和Hedges' g。

结果

活动能力的评分者内和评分者间相关性均显著(分别为r = 0.90和r = 0.88;p < 0.01),视力的相关性也显著(分别为r = 0.86和r = 0.87;p < 0.01)。Cronbach's α系数表明活动能力(0.97)和视力(0.96)具有近乎完美的可靠性。评分者内评估(p值范围为0.11至0.55)和评分者间评估(p值范围为0.37至0.55)均未发现统计学显著差异。Hedges' g检验显示,S1和S2之间总体跌倒风险指数的效应量为中等(g = 0.39),其他变量的效应量为小到中等。