• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗后腹腔镜与开放胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Sugimura Keijiro, Motoori Masaaki, Kentaro Kishi, Yamamoto Kazuyoshi, Takeno Atsushi, Hara Hisashi, Hamakawa Takuya, Murakami Kohei, Nakahara Yujiro, Masuzawa Toru, Omori Takeshi, Kurokawa Yukinori, Fujitani Kazumasa, Doki Yuichiro

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, 3-1-69 Inabaso, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 660-8511, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2304-2315. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11595-7. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11595-7
PMID:39948263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

This study included 247 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent NAC followed by gastrectomy between 2007 and 2017 at one of six institutions. The patients were divided into the open gastrectomy (OG) and LG groups. The short- and long-term outcomes in both groups were investigated after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 72 pairs of patients were selected. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different after matching. Compared with the OG group, the LG group had a significantly longer operative time (360 vs. 305 min, P = 0.002) and less intraoperative blood loss (271 vs. 652 mL, P < 0.001). The LG group had more harvested lymph nodes than the OG group (57.4 vs. 45.1, P < 0.001). The frequency of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications was not significantly different (26% vs. 22%, P = 0.698). The interval between surgery and postoperative chemotherapy was significantly shorter in the LG group (48.7 vs. 68.6 days, P = 0.048). The 5-year overall survival rates in the OG and LG groups were 54.4% and 53.5%, respectively. The overall survival was similar between the two groups (P = 0.773). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the type of recurrence, including lymph node, hematogenous, and peritoneal recurrences (P = 1.000, P = 1.000, and P = 0.686, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on both short- and long-term results, LG is a potential therapeutic option for patients with gastric cancer who undergo NAC.

摘要

背景

我们调查了接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的局部晚期胃癌患者行腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)的安全性和疗效。

方法

本研究纳入了2007年至2017年期间在六家机构之一接受NAC后行胃切除术的247例连续性晚期胃癌患者。患者被分为开腹胃切除术(OG)组和LG组。在倾向评分匹配后,对两组的短期和长期结局进行了调查。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,选择了72对患者。匹配后基线特征无显著差异。与OG组相比,LG组手术时间显著更长(360 vs. 305分钟,P = 0.002),术中出血量更少(271 vs. 652毫升,P < 0.001)。LG组切除的淋巴结比OG组更多(57.4 vs. 45.1,P < 0.001)。Clavien-Dindo≥2级术后并发症的发生率无显著差异(26% vs. 22%,P = 0.698)。LG组手术与术后化疗之间的间隔显著更短(48.7 vs. 68.6天,P = 0.048)。OG组和LG组的5年总生存率分别为54.4%和53.5%。两组的总生存率相似(P = 0.773)。两组在复发类型方面未观察到显著差异,包括淋巴结复发、血行转移和腹膜复发(分别为P = 1.000、P = 1.000和P = 0.686)。

结论

基于短期和长期结果,LG是接受NAC的胃癌患者的一种潜在治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.新辅助化疗后腹腔镜与开放胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2304-2315. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11595-7. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a high-volume center retrospective study with propensity score matching.新辅助治疗后机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗局部进展期胃癌的短期和长期疗效比较:一项高容量中心倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2814-2827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11626-3. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
3
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.新辅助化疗后局部进展期胃癌行腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术的短期和长期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5902-5915. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10052-7. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗临床及病理局部进展期胃癌的长期和短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5730-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的短期和长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1682-1690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07552-1. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
6
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comprehensive contrastive analysis with propensity score matching.新辅助化疗后局部进展期胃癌行腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术的对比:倾向评分匹配的综合对比分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov 9;21(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03221-4.
7
Surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗浆膜阳性(pT4a)胃癌的手术及长期肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;28:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
8
Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in high-risk patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗高危胃癌患者的短期和长期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):58-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6268-z. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Oncological long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for cT3-4 gastric cancer at surgical staging: a propensity-score matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗外科分期 cT3-4 期胃癌的肿瘤学长期结局:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6682-6690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11287-8. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Western Center Cohort Study.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术的对比:西方中心队列研究。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic factors and significance of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy.新辅助化疗后胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌患者的术后辅助化疗的预后因素及意义。
Surg Today. 2024 Nov;54(11):1379-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02853-7. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
2
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Three-year survival and distribution of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from a European randomized clinical trial.
新辅助化疗后胃癌患者的 3 年生存和淋巴结转移分布:一项欧洲随机临床试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7317-7324. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10278-5. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
4
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.新辅助化疗后局部进展期胃癌行腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术的短期和长期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5902-5915. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10052-7. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: The JLSSG0901 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的 5 年生存结局:JLSSG0901 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2023 May 1;158(5):445-454. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0096.
6
Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the KLASS-02 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的 5 年疗效:KLASS-02 随机临床试验结果
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):879-886. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2749.
7
Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的五年疗效:CLASS-01 随机临床试验结果
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jan 1;157(1):9-17. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5104.
8
Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.接受 D2 胃切除术的局部晚期胃或胃食管交界腺癌患者中,围手术期或术后辅助奥沙利铂联合 S-1 与辅助奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨的比较(RESOLVE):一项开放标签、优效性和非劣效性、III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1081-1092. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00297-7. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌根治术的长期疗效:KLASS-02 RCT 随机临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;38(28):3304-3313. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01210. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a European randomized trial.新辅助化疗后开放与微创全胃切除术的比较:一项欧洲随机试验的结果。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):258-271. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01109-w. Epub 2020 Jul 31.