Suppr超能文献

患有阅读障碍的成年人在估计间隔长度时,比对照组更少使用内化的节拍线索。

Adults With Dyslexia Use Internalised Beat Cues Less Than Controls When Estimating Interval Length.

作者信息

Torres Nathércia Lima, Batista Ana Rita, Sousa José, Folia Vasiliki, Baltos Dimitris, Mesquita Ana, Silva Susana

机构信息

Center for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2025 Feb;31(1):e70001. doi: 10.1002/dys.70001.

Abstract

Difficulties in both duration and beat-based time perception are common in individuals with dyslexia (DD). It is also known that internalised beat cues may aid in duration processing. This study investigated whether the difficulties in duration processing among DD stem from their inability to utilise internal beat cues. Participants with and without dyslexia estimated intervals ranging from 500 ms to 10 s. In the beat cue condition, participants listened to a sequence of 500 ms beats before the interval, and in the no beat cue condition, they were exposed to silence while EEG was recorded. Interestingly, the two groups did not differ in duration estimation performance, but they did differ in their utilisation of beat cues, with DD showing less sensitivity to these, whether the impact was negative (cues before shorter intervals) or positive (before longer intervals). Brainwave entrainment to the target frequency was significantly higher compared with entrainment to a non-target frequency, and cross-group differences were null. Our findings suggest that DD may have difficulties either in retaining the beat when it is no longer audible, or in using the internalised beat for duration estimation. Nevertheless, they can achieve comparable accuracy to neurotypical adults, possibly through compensatory strategies.

摘要

阅读障碍(DD)患者在基于节拍的时长感知和节拍时长感知方面都存在困难。众所周知,内化的节拍线索可能有助于时长处理。本研究调查了DD患者在时长处理方面的困难是否源于他们无法利用内部节拍线索。有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍的参与者估计了从500毫秒到10秒的时间间隔。在节拍线索条件下,参与者在间隔前听一段500毫秒的节拍序列,在无节拍线索条件下,他们在记录脑电图时处于安静状态。有趣的是,两组在时长估计表现上没有差异,但在节拍线索的利用上存在差异,DD患者对这些线索的敏感度较低,无论影响是负面的(较短间隔前的线索)还是正面的(较长间隔前的线索)。与对非目标频率的同步相比,对目标频率的脑电波同步显著更高,且组间差异不存在。我们的研究结果表明,DD患者可能在节拍不再可闻时难以保留节拍,或者在使用内化节拍进行时长估计方面存在困难。然而,他们可能通过补偿策略达到与神经典型成年人相当的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f1/11830862/437aaa9336ed/DYS-31-e70001-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验