Czopf J
Doc Ophthalmol. 1985 Feb;59(2):129-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00160609.
The visual evoked potential (VEP) results for 404 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are presented. In 171 patients pattern reversal with light-emitting diode (PR (LED] VEPs and in 85 patients pattern reversal with TV (PR(TV] VEPs also were investigated. The pathologic process of MS affects the amplitude and latency of all components and the form and symmetry of responses. A complex evaluation of VEP is proposed instead of measurement of only one component. A combined flash and pattern presentation VEP evaluation may be as effective as PREPs in the detection of subclinical lesions. PR(LED) VEP seems to be more sensitive to the degree of visual disturbance and to the clinical probability of MS than the PR(TV) VEP. A statistical analysis disclosed correlation of VEP amplitude and latency data with the visual impairment, one with the duration and multiplicity (generalization) of the disease. Combination of different methods increases the discriminative power of the VEP investigation.
本文展示了404例多发性硬化症(MS)患者的视觉诱发电位(VEP)结果。其中171例患者接受了发光二极管模式翻转视觉诱发电位(PR(LED)VEP)检查,85例患者还接受了电视模式翻转视觉诱发电位(PR(TV)VEP)检查。MS的病理过程会影响所有成分的振幅和潜伏期以及反应的形式和对称性。因此,建议对VEP进行综合评估,而不是仅测量一个成分。在检测亚临床病变方面,闪光和模式呈现相结合的VEP评估可能与PR(LED)VEP一样有效。与PR(TV)VEP相比,PR(LED)VEP似乎对视觉障碍程度和MS临床可能性更敏感。统计分析表明,VEP振幅和潜伏期数据与视力损害、疾病持续时间和多发性(广泛性)相关。不同方法的结合提高了VEP检查的鉴别能力。