• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌在结肠镜检查儿童候选者肠道准备方案中的疗效

Efficacy of Probiotic in the Bowel Preparation Regimen of Children Candidates for Colonoscopy.

作者信息

Rahmani Parisa, Ebrahimi Maryam, Rohani Pejman, Sohouli Mohammad Hassan, Magalhães Elma Izze da Silva

机构信息

Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Pediatrics Centre of Excellence, Children's Medical Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.

Postgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2025 Feb 17;9(2):e70119. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70119. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70119
PMID:39963127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11831066/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bowel preparation can directly affect the final outcome of a colonoscopy. However, limited studies have been conducted regarding the effect of probiotics on intestinal preparation. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the effect of probiotics in the bowel preparation regimen of children who are candidates for colonoscopy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 84 colonoscopy candidate pediatric patients were enrolled. Patients were divided into two equal groups of 42 individuals. One group of patients underwent the bisacodyl, polyethylene glycol regimen 48 h before colonoscopy, as along with a placebo. The other group was administered 10 days before colonoscopy and also received bisacodyl and polyethylene glycol 48 h before the procedure. Then, the bowel preparation of the patients was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in the placebo and probiotic groups was 94.1 ± 43.8 and 111.2 ± 48.8 months, respectively ( = 0.10). The preparation of the left colon was not significantly different between the placebo and probiotic groups ( = 0.075). The effect of probiotic on the preparation of the right colon was excellent in 18 patients (42.86%) and good in 17 patients (40.47%). The preparation of the right colon was significantly different between the placebo and probiotic groups ( = 0.007). Based on the results, there was a significant association between the consumption of and placebo in the preparation of the transverse colon ( = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Probiotic pretreatment as part of bowel preparation significantly improves visualization of the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy.

摘要

目的

肠道准备可直接影响结肠镜检查的最终结果。然而,关于益生菌对肠道准备效果的研究有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨益生菌在结肠镜检查候选儿童肠道准备方案中的作用。

方法和材料

在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验中,纳入了84例结肠镜检查候选儿科患者。患者被平均分为两组,每组42人。一组患者在结肠镜检查前48小时采用比沙可啶、聚乙二醇方案,并服用安慰剂。另一组在结肠镜检查前10天服用益生菌,在检查前48小时也接受比沙可啶和聚乙二醇。然后,使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估患者的肠道准备情况。

结果

安慰剂组和益生菌组患者的平均年龄分别为94.1±43.8个月和111.2±48.8个月(P=0.10)。安慰剂组和益生菌组左半结肠的准备情况无显著差异(P=0.075)。益生菌对右半结肠的准备效果在18例患者中为优(42.86%),17例患者中为良(40.47%)。安慰剂组和益生菌组右半结肠的准备情况有显著差异(P=0.007)。根据结果,在横结肠准备中,益生菌组与安慰剂组之间存在显著关联(P=0.015)。

结论

作为肠道准备一部分的益生菌预处理可显著改善结肠镜检查期间结肠黏膜的可视化。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Probiotic in the Bowel Preparation Regimen of Children Candidates for Colonoscopy.益生菌在结肠镜检查儿童候选者肠道准备方案中的疗效
JGH Open. 2025 Feb 17;9(2):e70119. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70119. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®).与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸(MoviPrep®)相比,聚乙二醇 - 3350(Miralax®)+ 1.9升运动饮料(佳得乐®)+ 2片比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备效果较差。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17536.
3
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation.2升聚乙二醇-柠檬酸盐-西甲硅油加比沙可啶与4升聚乙二醇用于慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查前的肠道准备比较
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Oct;47(10):857-63. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure.强化肠道清洁策略在结肠镜检查失败后的重复应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1578-84. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823434c8.
6
Bowel preparation using 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen plus lubiprostone versus 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen: a randomized controlled trial.口服 2L 分剂量聚乙二醇方案联合鲁比前列酮与口服 4L 分剂量聚乙二醇方案用于肠道准备的随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 17;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02497-2.
7
Addition of Lubiprostone to polyethylene glycol(PEG) enhances the quality & efficacy of colonoscopy preparation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.在聚乙二醇(PEG)中添加鲁比前列酮可提高结肠镜检查准备的质量和效果:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0542-0.
8
Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.
9
Effectiveness of low-volume split-dose versus same-day morning polyethylene glycol regimen for adequacy of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.低容量分次与同日清晨聚乙二醇方案用于结肠镜检查患者肠道准备充分性的效果:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun;41(3):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s12664-021-01228-x. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Comparison of one and two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in pediatric colonoscopy.聚乙二醇用于儿科结肠镜检查时一日与两日肠道准备的比较
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;26(3):232-5. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.6837.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of Colonoscopy in Intestinal Diseases.肠道疾病中的结肠镜检查综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;13(7):1262. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071262.
2
Benefits of Probiotic Pretreatment on the Gut Microbiota and Minor Complications after Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial.益生菌预处理对结肠镜肠道准备后肠道微生物群和轻微并发症的益处:一项随机双盲、安慰剂对照的初步试验。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 24;15(5):1141. doi: 10.3390/nu15051141.
3
The Efficacy and Safety of Combined Senna and Probiotic-Based Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children.番泻叶与益生菌联合用于儿童结肠镜检查肠道准备的有效性和安全性
Cureus. 2020 Sep 1;12(9):e10180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10180.
4
Oral Probiotics Alleviate Intestinal Dysbacteriosis for People Receiving Bowel Preparation.口服益生菌可缓解接受肠道准备患者的肠道菌群失调。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 28;7:73. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00073. eCollection 2020.
5
Clear Liquid Versus Low-fibre Diet in Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in Children: A Randomized Trial.儿童结肠镜检查肠道准备中清液与低纤维饮食的比较:一项随机试验
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 May;66(5):720-724. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001832.
6
The Role of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Visceral Pain.胃肠道微生物群在内脏痛中的作用。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;239:269-287. doi: 10.1007/164_2016_115.
7
Polyethylene Glycol- or Sodium Picosulphate-Based Laxatives Before Colonoscopy in Children.儿童结肠镜检查前使用聚乙二醇或比沙可啶钠类泻药
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Mar;62(3):414-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000978.
8
Does Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Plus Ascorbic Acid Induce More Mucosal Injuries than Split-Dose 4-L PEG during Bowel Preparation?在肠道准备过程中,聚乙二醇(PEG)加抗坏血酸比分次服用4升PEG引发的黏膜损伤更多吗?
Gut Liver. 2016 Mar;10(2):237-43. doi: 10.5009/gnl14439.
9
Effects of bowel cleansing on the intestinal microbiota.肠道清洁对肠道微生物群的影响。
Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1562-8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307240. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Microbiome: bacterial imbalance in Crohn's disease.微生物群:克罗恩病中的细菌失衡。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 May;12(5):312. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3255. Epub 2014 Mar 17.