• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

困难生活情境下的女性对身体活动项目的偏好:德国 NU-BIG 项目中离散选择实验的方案。

Preferences of women in difficult life situations for a physical activity programme: protocol of a discrete choice experiment in the German NU-BIG project.

机构信息

Professorship of Public Health and Prevention, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e067235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067235.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067235
PMID:37460258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357700/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The BIG project ('Bewegung als Investition in die Gesundheit', ie, 'Movement as Investment in Health') was developed in 2005 as a community-based participatory research programme to offer accessible opportunities for physical activity to women in difficult life situations. Since then, the programme has been expanded to eight sites in Germany. A systematic evaluation of BIG is currently being conducted. As part of this effort, we strive to understand the preferences of participating women for different aspects of the programme, and to analyse their willingness to pay.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this protocol, we describe the development and analysis plan of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate participants' preferences for a physical activity programme for women in difficult life situations. The experiment will be embedded in a questionnaire covering several aspects of participation in the programme (eg, reach, efficacy and further effects) and the socioeconomic characteristics of all active participants. After a thorough search of the literature, BIG documents review and expert interviews, we identified five important attributes of the programme: course times, travel time to the course venue, additional social activities organised by BIG, consideration of wishes and interests for the further planning of courses and costs per course unit. Thereafter, we piloted the experiment with a sample of participants from the target group. After data collection, the experiment will be analysed using a conditional logit model and a latent class analysis to assess eventual heterogeneity in preferences.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Understanding women's preferences will provide useful insights for the further development of the programme and ultimately increase participation and retention. The questionnaire, the included DCE and the pretest on participants received ethical approval (application no. 20-247_1-B). We plan to disseminate the results of the DCE in peer-reviewed journals, national conferences and among participants and programme coordinators and organisers.

摘要

简介

BIG 项目(“Bewegung als Investition in die Gesundheit”,即“运动是健康的投资”)于 2005 年作为一项基于社区的参与式研究计划而开发,旨在为处于困境中的女性提供可及的体育活动机会。自那时以来,该计划已扩展到德国的八个地点。目前正在对 BIG 进行系统评估。作为这项工作的一部分,我们努力了解参与女性对该计划不同方面的偏好,并分析她们的支付意愿。

方法和分析

在本方案中,我们描述了一项离散选择实验(DCE)的开发和分析计划,以调查参与者对困难生活情境中女性体育活动计划的偏好。该实验将嵌入一个调查问卷中,涵盖参与该计划的几个方面(例如,覆盖范围、效果和进一步影响)以及所有活跃参与者的社会经济特征。在对文献进行彻底搜索、BIG 文档审查和专家访谈之后,我们确定了该计划的五个重要属性:课程时间、前往课程地点的旅行时间、BIG 组织的额外社交活动、对课程进一步规划的意愿和兴趣以及每门课程单元的费用。此后,我们对目标人群中的参与者样本进行了实验试点。在收集数据后,我们将使用条件逻辑回归模型和潜在类别分析来分析实验,以评估偏好的潜在异质性。

伦理和传播

了解女性的偏好将为该计划的进一步发展提供有用的见解,并最终增加参与度和保留率。问卷、包含的 DCE 和对参与者的预测试均获得了伦理批准(申请号 20-247_1-B)。我们计划在同行评议期刊、国家会议以及在参与者、计划协调员和组织者中传播 DCE 的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c4c/10357700/2b1226aebad0/bmjopen-2022-067235f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c4c/10357700/2b1226aebad0/bmjopen-2022-067235f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c4c/10357700/2b1226aebad0/bmjopen-2022-067235f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferences of women in difficult life situations for a physical activity programme: protocol of a discrete choice experiment in the German NU-BIG project.困难生活情境下的女性对身体活动项目的偏好:德国 NU-BIG 项目中离散选择实验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e067235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067235.
2
"That's like therapy"-A qualitative study on socially disadvantaged women's views on the effects of a community-based participatory research project on their health and health behavior.“这就像治疗一样”——一项关于社会劣势女性对社区参与式研究项目对其健康和健康行为影响的看法的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;12:1339556. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339556. eCollection 2024.
3
Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内组织物残留后影响女性对进一步处理选择偏好的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1674-1683. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex216.
4
Preferences of people with type 2 diabetes for telemedical lifestyle programmes in Germany: protocol of a discrete choice experiment.德国2型糖尿病患者对远程医疗生活方式项目的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e036995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036995.
5
Understanding the preferences of young women in self-sampling interventions for sexually transmitted infection diagnosis: a discrete choice experimental protocol.了解年轻女性对性传播感染诊断自我采样干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e082981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082981.
6
General populations' preferences for colorectal cancer screening: rationale and protocol for the discrete choice experiment in the SIGMO study.一般人群对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:SIGMO 研究中离散选择实验的原理和方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):e042399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399.
7
Preferences of people with mild cognitive impairment for physical activity interventions in China: protocol for a discrete choice experiment study.轻度认知障碍患者对中国身体活动干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 14;12(10):e064153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064153.
8
A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding patient medicine preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain.用于离散选择实验的方案:了解患者在管理慢性非癌症疼痛方面对药物的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e027153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027153.
9
Understanding HIV-positive patients' preferences for healthcare services: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.了解HIV阳性患者对医疗服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 18;6(7):e008549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008549.
10
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.

引用本文的文献

1
Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.评估身体活动偏好的离散选择实验:属性及其水平的混合方法研究
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Oct 29;38:125. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.125. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Qualitative Evaluation of a Community-Based Intervention on Health-Related Behaviors in Disadvantaged Women.基于社区的干预对贫困妇女健康相关行为的定性评估。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023 Mar;94(1):272-282. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.1971149. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Cooperative planning and its utilization in German physical activity promotion: a brief introduction.德国体育活动促进中的合作规划及其应用:简要介绍
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii1-ii7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab170.
3
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in second-generation British Indian women: A qualitative study.
第二代英裔印度女性身体活动的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 3;16(11):e0259248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259248. eCollection 2021.
4
The Long-Term Public Health Impact of a Community-Based Participatory Research Project for Health Promotion Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-A Case Study Protocol.基于社区的参与式研究项目对社会弱势群体女性健康促进的长期公共卫生影响:一项案例研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:628630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628630. eCollection 2021.
5
Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women-Experiences From 15 Years of BIG.将一个基于社区的参与式研究项目转移到促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动中——来自 BIG 15 年的经验。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;8:571413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571413. eCollection 2020.
6
Capabilities for Physical Activity by Turkish- and Russian-Speaking Immigrants Aged 65 Years and Older in Germany: A Qualitative Study.德国65岁及以上讲土耳其语和俄语的移民的身体活动能力:一项定性研究
J Aging Phys Act. 2020 Jan 8;28(4):567-579. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0446. Print 2020 Aug 1.
7
Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes.社区参与卫生服务的发展、实施和评估:赋权、健康、社区和过程结果的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216112. eCollection 2019.
8
The contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic inequalities in health: A systematic review.健康行为对健康的社会经济不平等的影响:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2018 Aug;113:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
Changing educational inequalities in sporting inactivity among adults in Germany: a trend study from 2003 to 2012.德国成年人体育活动不活跃方面教育不平等状况的变化:一项2003年至2012年的趋势研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 6;17(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4478-2.
10
Balancing Upstream and Downstream Measures to Tackle the Obesity Epidemic: A Position Statement from the European Association for the Study of Obesity.平衡上游和下游措施以应对肥胖流行:欧洲肥胖研究协会的立场声明
Obes Facts. 2017;10(1):61-63. doi: 10.1159/000455960. Epub 2017 Mar 1.