Dragomir Maria-Alexandra, Constantinescu Alexandru, Andronic Octavian
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Romania.
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Dec;19(4):769-774. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.7692024;.
Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has long been a subject of debate in colorectal surgery. While it was historically regarded as a standard preoperative practice, recent evidence has questioned its necessity and effectiveness, especially when used in isolation. This review explores the evolving role of MBP, its combination with oral antibiotics (OA), and its impact on postoperative outcomes, such as surgical site infections (SSI) and anastomotic leakage (AL). Studies suggest that MBP combined with OA offers superior benefits compared to MBP alone, particularly in left-sided colorectal and rectal surgeries. However, the role of MBP remains contentious in right-sided resections, with conflicting evidence regarding its effectiveness. Furthermore, concerns about patient discomfort, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances have raised doubts about its routine use. Our comprehensive analysis, based on 11 years of published research, highlights that the decision to employ MBP should be individualized, taking into account the type of surgical intervention, patient comorbidities and overall health status. While MBP+OA shows promise in reducing SSI rates, further research is needed to evaluate its broader clinical implications and to explore alternatives, including newer antibiotics, to minimize reliance on MBP.
机械性肠道准备(MBP)长期以来一直是结直肠手术中争论的焦点。虽然在历史上它被视为一种标准的术前做法,但最近的证据对其必要性和有效性提出了质疑,尤其是单独使用时。本综述探讨了MBP不断演变的作用、其与口服抗生素(OA)的联合使用及其对术后结局的影响,如手术部位感染(SSI)和吻合口漏(AL)。研究表明,与单独使用MBP相比,MBP联合OA具有更大的益处,特别是在左半结肠和直肠手术中。然而,MBP在右侧切除术中的作用仍存在争议,关于其有效性的证据相互矛盾。此外,对患者不适、脱水和电解质失衡的担忧也引发了对其常规使用的质疑。我们基于11年已发表研究的综合分析强调,采用MBP的决定应个体化,要考虑手术干预的类型、患者的合并症和整体健康状况。虽然MBP+OA在降低SSI发生率方面显示出前景,但仍需要进一步研究来评估其更广泛的临床意义,并探索替代方法,包括新型抗生素,以尽量减少对MBP的依赖。