Person E S
J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1985 Apr;13(2):159-80. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1985.13.2.159.
Although the erotic transference is believed to be universal, it is variable in its expression. Drawing on the distinction between transference resistance and resistance to the awareness of the transference, I have proposed that, in general, the erotic transference utilized as resistance is more common among women, while resistance to the awareness of the erotic transference is more common among male patients. Erotic transference as resistance poses different analytic problems from those posed by resistance to its awareness. With women in treatment with men, the erotic transference is more often overt, consciously experienced, intense, long-lived and directed toward the analyst, and focused more on love than sex; with men in treatment with women, the erotic transference is muted, relatively short-lived, appears indirectly in dreams and triangular preoccupations, is seldom consciously experienced as a dominant affective motif, is frequently transposed to a woman outside the analytic situation, and most often appears as sexual rather than as a longing for love. In women, the strength of the erotic transference may obscure other important dynamics and conflicts. In short, the strength of the erotic transference, while it has significant therapeutic potential, often acts as a strong transference resistance to working out underlying conflicts. In contrast, in male patients in treatment with women, there is a resistance to the experience of the transference and, frequently, one witnesses defenses against the erotic transference rather than the transference itself. Yet, the dangers are substantial when the erotic transference fails to develop or is suppressed. This difference in the manifestation of the erotic transference parallels an extratherapeutic difference. In general, women achieve their self-identity as women by virtue of certain defining relationships, whereas men achieve their self-identity as men through achievement and autonomy. The reasons for these differences have been explored in terms of cultural dictates, but more particularly in terms of an asymmetry in psychological development.
尽管性移情被认为是普遍存在的,但其表现形式却各不相同。借鉴移情阻抗与对移情觉察的阻抗之间的区别,我曾提出,一般而言,用作阻抗的性移情在女性中更为常见,而对性移情觉察的阻抗在男性患者中更为常见。作为阻抗的性移情带来的分析问题与对其觉察的阻抗所带来的问题不同。在女性接受男性治疗时,性移情往往更公开、能被有意识地体验到、强烈、持久且指向分析师,并且更多地聚焦于爱而非性;在男性接受女性治疗时,性移情较为隐匿、持续时间相对较短,间接出现在梦境和三角关系的执念中,很少被有意识地体验为主要的情感主题,常常转移到分析情境之外的女性身上,并且最常表现为性而非对爱的渴望。在女性中,性移情的强度可能会掩盖其他重要的动力和冲突。简而言之,性移情的强度虽然具有显著的治疗潜力,但往往会成为解决潜在冲突的强大移情阻抗。相比之下,在男性接受女性治疗的患者中,存在对移情体验的阻抗,而且常常可以看到针对性移情的防御而非移情本身。然而,当性移情未能发展或被抑制时,危险是巨大的。性移情表现上的这种差异与治疗情境之外的差异相平行。一般来说,女性凭借某些特定的关系来实现其作为女性的自我认同,而男性则通过成就和自主性来实现其作为男性的自我认同。这些差异的原因已从文化指令的角度进行了探讨,但更具体地说是从心理发展的不对称性角度进行探讨的。